Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 794 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icondown Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  66029   Thu Oct 30 11:05:11 2008 Agree T. Ribbrockemgaron+elog@ribbrock.orgQuestionAll2.7.5-2130Re: (How) can I hide columns in List view?

Stefan Ritt wrote:

[...]

The only way I see how you can achieve what you want is to define two separate logbooks, but serve them from the same directory (via the "Data dir" option). Both logbooks should share the same attribute definition, but use different "List display" options.

 I take it you mean the "Subdir" option (the manual mentions "Data dir" as obsolete)? I tried it with that and it works like a charm - gives me now two logbooks, i.e. two tabs with the same data and two different views - which is precisely what we need. Thanks!

Regards,

Thomas

  66087   Thu Nov 27 11:36:53 2008 Agree T. Ribbrockemgaron+elog@ribbrock.orgBug reportLinux2.7.5-2130Re: Select -> Edit wipes dates

Stefan Ritt wrote:

 This problem has been fixed in revision 2.7.5-2143. Please upgrade.

 Yup, this works now - thanks a mil!

  66280   Thu Mar 26 17:09:47 2009 Agree Dinkel Markusm.dinkel@mr-daten.deQuestionWindows2.7.5-2175Re: New column on main page

Stefan Ritt wrote:
Dinkel Markus wrote:

 This is Ok but in wich file can i add this tag? In the .cfg-file?

Yes, this goes into the elogd.cfg file. Just add a line like:

[logbook]

Comment = OS-Version<br><i>192.160.0.1</i>

Then you will get something like this:

Capture.png

 Thanks, this is great.

By, Markus

  66380   Fri Jun 5 12:02:45 2009 Agree David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukQuestionLinux2.7.6-2191Re: Moving entry (and replies) from one log book to another
Thanks Stefan,  Downloading shortly and I'll let you know ;-)
> > Hi Stefan,
> > 
> > When Moving entry (and replies) from one log book to another, is it possible to prevent elog from renumbering
> > the entries' ID number(s) ($@MID@$).  While it may not be good practice, we've referred to these numbers in
> > cross-referencing, and it all goes wrong when an entry is moved from an "Open" thread to a "Closed" thread (cf
> > your FAQ about marking of whole threads).
> > 
> > In the cases I'm thinking about, i.e. from main logbook to archive logbook(s), there would never be a clash of
> > ID number.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > David Pilgram.
> 
> I have implemented this feature in revision 2205. You need to set the new flag "Preserve IDs = 1" in the 
> configuration. I have not tested this extensively, but I'm sure you will do it ;-)
  66432   Thu Jul 2 11:33:48 2009 Agree David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukQuestionLinux2.7.6-2226Re: Cancelling an Roption selection in Edit.
> > Hi Stefan,
> > 
> > I don't know if anyone else would be interested or need this...
> > 
> > If you have an Roption, and it is not required (maybe...) or have a preset attribute, it is possible to make an
> > entry and have replies without any of the attributes in that Roption being selected.
> > 
> > However, once an attribute in that Roption has been selected, it is not possible to go back (editing) to the
> > condition before one was selected on that entry (so far as I can tell).  
> > 
> > Is a way of cancelling all the possible attributes in an Roption practical?  Would others want it?  It is
> > possible with options, as there is a "please select" which can be used to cancel whichever attribute in the
> > option that has been selected.
> > 
> > Regards,  David
> 
> The easiest to achieve this is to define another option. Assume you have the three options
> 
> One, Two, Three
> 
> and you want to "unselect" them. So just add a fourth option like
> 
> Unspecified, One, Two, Three
> 
> so if you do not want any of the "One, Two, Three", just click on "Unspecified" and you get what you want.

This is sort of what I do now, I just wondered if there was a way of clearing that would leave the field completely
blank in the YYMMDDa.log file.

Thanks.
  66482   Wed Jul 29 13:23:41 2009 Agree T. Ribbrockemgaron+elog@ribbrock.orgBug reportLinux2.7.6r2233Re: Odd problem (bug?) with certain attribute

T. Ribbrock wrote:

 Very nice, thank you! Given that I also still have to test the fix you made for the crash problem with "shared" logbooks (I assume it's also present in 2244), I'll upgrade and report back (probably tomorrow).

 2244 is now running, and indeed, the "Size" attribute works now. Thank you!

  66483   Wed Jul 29 14:48:34 2009 Agree T. Ribbrockemgaron+elog@ribbrock.orgBug reportLinux2.7.6r2233Re: Crashes when editing entries

By now, I've installed 2244 and ran some rudimentary tests. So far, I was not able to reproduce the crash anymore. Looking good!

  66523   Wed Sep 2 09:39:20 2009 Agree james Goedsirjames.goedsir@stratosglobal.comQuestionWindows2.7.7Re: Time Display Format

james Goedsir wrote:

My Time field is displayed i  a 12 Hour format I would like to change it to 24 Hours, can someone advised how it can be done

 Sorted no problem

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6