Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG  Not logged in ELOG logo
icon3.gif   Sorting Museremail, posted by Steve Williamson on Thu Nov 13 13:25:25 2008 
    icon2.gif   Re: Sorting Museremail, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Nov 17 10:08:01 2008 
       icon2.gif   Re: Sorting Museremail, posted by Steve Williamson on Mon Nov 17 12:07:18 2008 
          icon2.gif   Re: Sorting Museremail, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Nov 17 12:20:17 2008 
             icon2.gif   Re: Sorting Museremail, posted by Steve Williamson on Mon Nov 17 13:03:19 2008 
                icon2.gif   Re: Sorting Museremail, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Nov 18 09:13:26 2008 
                   icon2.gif   Re: Sorting Museremail, posted by Steve Williamson on Thu Nov 20 10:29:39 2008 
Message ID: 66062     Entry time: Thu Nov 20 10:29:39 2008     In reply to: 66060
Icon: Reply  Author: Steve Williamson  Author Email: StephenWilliamson@Barnsley.gov.uk 
Category: Request  OS: Linux  ELOG Version: 2.7.5 
Subject: Re: Sorting Museremail 

Stefan Ritt wrote:

 

Steve Williamson wrote:

 

However, the main reason for the request was that the I was so pleased with the ordering introduced in 2.7.5 but, as it is more normal for me  to look down a list of names ordered by last-name/first-name than the other way about, I thought it worth asking if there was any way to do this sensibly.  I appreciate that it isn't simple and what suits me may well not suit others - so thanks for taking time to consider the possibilities.  I guess the only real solution is to define users differently, e.g. by structuring the name data into first name(s) and last name (not a global solution but would suit most of western europe and the USA at least!) but that is bound to have lots of impacts both on the application and on existing setups - so not really feasible, and probably not worth the disruption.

 

 That's correct. Adding first name(s), last name(s) requires major modifications which are not se easy and I don't have time for that in the moment. So we'll keep it for the time being.

 That's fine.  Thanks for listenening - and for keeping on with elog

regards

Steve

 

 

ELOG V3.1.5-fe60aaf