(For some reason I could not add this in Dennis's thread.)
I like this new feature, BUT
I happen to have two Options: Options System, and Options Status.
System are a very few items, whereas Status has a long list, which, like Dennis's example, can be added to.
Keeping the latter in alpha order is great, but it's a shame that the cost is that Options System are also
sorted alphabetically, whereas it has a natural order which it would be preferable to keep - for example (and
this is made up)
Options System: 3.1, NT, 2000, XP, Vista
where the natural order here is chronological.
Perhaps the configuration file option could be more specific, for example
Sort attribute Options Status = 1
which would then NOT sort Options System. If both are needed to be sorted, both should be specified, or back to
the original syntax which defaults to sort *all* Options. |