Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG  Not logged in ELOG logo
icon3.gif   Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter, posted by David Pilgram on Mon Aug 10 21:07:15 2009 
    icon2.gif   Re: Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter, posted by David Pilgram on Mon Aug 10 21:19:50 2009 
    icon2.gif   Re: Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Aug 11 08:38:56 2009 
       icon2.gif   Re: Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter, posted by David Pilgram on Tue Aug 11 10:07:08 2009 
          icon2.gif   Re: Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter, posted by Dennis Seitz on Tue Aug 11 17:46:33 2009 
Message ID: 66504     Entry time: Mon Aug 10 21:07:15 2009     Reply to this: 66505   66510
Icon: Idea  Author: David Pilgram  Author Email: David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk 
Category: Comment  OS: Linux  ELOG Version: 2.7.7-2251 
Subject: Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter 
(For some reason I could not add this in Dennis's thread.)

I like this new feature, BUT

I happen to have two Options:   Options System, and Options Status.

System are a very few items, whereas Status has a long list, which, like Dennis's example, can be added to. 
Keeping the latter in alpha order is great, but it's a shame that the cost is that Options System are also
sorted alphabetically, whereas it has a natural order which it would be preferable to keep - for example (and
this is made up)

Options System: 3.1, NT, 2000, XP, Vista

where the natural order here is chronological.

Perhaps the configuration file option could be more specific, for example

Sort attribute Options Status = 1

which would then NOT sort Options System.  If both are needed to be sorted, both should be specified, or back to
the original syntax which defaults to sort *all* Options.
ELOG V3.1.5-fe60aaf