Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG  Not logged in ELOG logo
icon3.gif   Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter, posted by David Pilgram on Mon Aug 10 21:07:15 2009 
    icon2.gif   Re: Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter, posted by David Pilgram on Mon Aug 10 21:19:50 2009 
    icon2.gif   Re: Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Aug 11 08:38:56 2009 
       icon2.gif   Re: Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter, posted by David Pilgram on Tue Aug 11 10:07:08 2009 
          icon2.gif   Re: Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter, posted by Dennis Seitz on Tue Aug 11 17:46:33 2009 
Message ID: 66515     Entry time: Tue Aug 11 17:46:33 2009     In reply to: 66511
Icon: Reply  Author: Dennis Seitz  Author Email: dseitz@berkeley.edu 
Category: Comment  OS: Linux  ELOG Version: 2.7.7-2251 
Subject: Re: Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter 
Yes, many thanks, Stefan, from me, too! It's really great that you respond so quickly to requests and suggestions.

And thanks to David for the fine tuning, great suggestion.

Dennis

> Thanks Stefan!  Works great.
> 
> > Ok, that makes sense, so I changed it to
> > 
> > Sort Attribute Options Status = 1
> > 
> > as you suggested.
> > 
> > > (For some reason I could not add this in Dennis's thread.)
> > > 
> > > I like this new feature, BUT
> > > 
> > > I happen to have two Options:   Options System, and Options Status.
> > > 
> > > System are a very few items, whereas Status has a long list, which, like Dennis's example, can be added to. 
> > > Keeping the latter in alpha order is great, but it's a shame that the cost is that Options System are also
> > > sorted alphabetically, whereas it has a natural order which it would be preferable to keep - for example (and
> > > this is made up)
> > > 
> > > Options System: 3.1, NT, 2000, XP, Vista
> > > 
> > > where the natural order here is chronological.
> > > 
> > > Perhaps the configuration file option could be more specific, for example
> > > 
> > > Sort attribute Options Status = 1
> > > 
> > > which would then NOT sort Options System.  If both are needed to be sorted, both should be specified, or back to
> > > the original syntax which defaults to sort *all* Options.
ELOG V3.1.5-fe60aaf