Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG  Not logged in ELOG logo
icon5.gif   Attachments (again), posted by David Pilgram on Wed Aug 31 14:00:17 2011 
    icon2.gif   Re: Attachments (again), posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed Aug 31 15:00:11 2011 
       icon2.gif   Re: Attachments (again), posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Aug 31 15:13:02 2011 
          icon2.gif   Re: Attachments (again), posted by David Pilgram on Wed Aug 31 15:29:32 2011 
       icon1.gif   Re: Attachments (again), posted by David Pilgram on Wed Aug 31 15:20:48 2011 
          icon2.gif   Re: Attachments (again), posted by Andreas Luedeke on Tue Sep 6 12:00:13 2011 
             icon2.gif   Re: Attachments (again), posted by David Pilgram on Tue Sep 6 12:39:39 2011 
Message ID: 67117     Entry time: Tue Sep 6 12:39:39 2011     In reply to: 67115
Icon: Reply  Author: David Pilgram  Author Email: David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk 
Category: Question  OS: All  ELOG Version: 2.9.0-2411 
Subject: Re: Attachments (again) 
> > I wondered if there had been some flag for the config file whereby the original file for attachment was
> > processed by ImageMagick, but not stored, only the .png file(s) stored - or rather, some other way that achieved
> > the same end. as there is no such flag at present.
> > 
> > For now, anyway, I can attach the documents/pics I want, then go in and delete the 'originals' as saved in the
> > logbook, leaving just the .png files. But maybe something for the wishlist?
> 
> At least I now understood your problem :-)
> 
> You can have a script in your hidden logbook, that processes your attachments with "execute new", create thumbnails
> of them (using ImageMagicks "convert") and submit those thumbnails as one additional entry to your public logbook.
> 
> But then you would get thumbnails of all attachments of the hidden logbook in the public one, maybe you don't want
> that either? If you want them all, this method is more automated. If you just want some, do it as you suggested it.
> 
> In my opinion this is a rather exotic feature request :-)
> I wonder if there is a second person in the world who could use it?

Hi Andreas,

True, as a feature explained here, it may not be the most frequently used ;-)

And you are right, I would not want *all* attachements in the hidden directory to appear in the public.  But I've got
quite used to playing around in the logbook subdirectories now.

In my case, the ever-expanding use I make of ELOG - and the fact that I use it with the logbook directory stored on a
memory stick (to move from location to location and use local computers, and that's partly to ensure the hidden
directory stays hidden!) - does mean I sometimes run into issues that some hyper-networked system with ZB of storage
don't even notice. 
ELOG V3.1.5-fe60aaf