ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
69837
|
Wed Sep 25 16:00:06 2024 |
| Nick Sauerwein | nick.sauerwein@luxtelligence.ai | Bug report | Linux | Windows | Mac OSX | ELOG V3.1.5 | Re: Equation Editor does not work |
We have observed the same issue. Did the CodeCogs api change?
Thanks for the help.
Dominic wrote: |
Hi!
I am not sure if this is a know issue: it seems that the equation editor does not work anymore. Is there any fix or alternative method to type latex formula in the log?
Thank you!
|
|
69836
|
Wed Sep 25 15:02:16 2024 |
| Patrick Upson | patrick.upson@dfo-mpo.gc.ca | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Re: Looking for version update advice |
I ran a test (using Windows) and you're correct about the subfolder and file naming. I don't think that'll be an issue, but it's good to be aware of. If we end up having to revert to 2.9.2 for whatever reason, I think it sould still work fine if what logs we have are just copied up a directory (i.e /home/logfiles/2023/23mmdda.log ==> /home/logfiles/23mmdda.log)
The difference in the directory structure doesn't matter for my purposes.
David Pilgram wrote: |
I use linux elog, and if you upgrade to v3.x.x, it's difficult to go back to v2.9.x. This is because the log files get grouped in year sub directories at v3.x.x.
In 2.9.x, the logfiles are store as (made up example) /home/logfiles/yymmdda.log
In 3.x.x they are stored as /home/logfiles/2024/24mmdda.log /home/logfiles/2023/23mmdda.log etc. I think I got the labelling of the subdirectories correct, Stefan will no doubt correct if I am wrong.
I assume the same is true for the Windows version as it would be weird for a split in the program by OS for something important but trivial to impliment for all OS.
It's a bore to sort that out if you have to revert to 2.9.x - I know, I've done it - but I don't recall any change in format in the individual yymmdda.log files with an early v3.x.x version I tried. There may be additions to the log files made in much more recent v3.1.x or so versions, but I guess you are ok with whatever they may be as you've checked the change log.
Patrick Upson wrote: |
Thanks. I did eveuntaully find the change log and made the decision to upgrade the at-sea machines. So far the configuration file we update for each mission still works. I have a copy of the 2.9.2 installer that if something catostrophic happens I can remove the new version and take it back, but I don't think it'll be a problem. We archive logbooks at the end of a mission, but each mission basically starts from a fresh install like state anyway.
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
If 3.1.4 runs safely on your laptop, there should be no problem to update the 2.9.2 one. But first do it on a copy of your logbooks from the at-sea. The get converted automatically into a newer format but that should be transparent.
On the other hand you don't really need a new system if your old installation works fine and you don't need any of hte new features.
The changelog ist here: https://elog.psi.ch/elog/download/ChangeLog
Stefan
Patrick Upson wrote: |
I've inherited a position that includes deploying elog for an at-sea mission. Once at sea there's no gauntee of internet connection so I have to be sure things are going to work before hand. The machines I currently have (we have several backup machines) are running elog version 2.9.2 and I'm looking for a change log, or feature list to determine if it's safe to update the at-sea laptops to the latest version of elog.
On one hand, I could leave things as they are and I'm sure it will just work, on the other hand, I hate seeing things get out of date to the point that something just stops working some day and there's no ability to get support for old software.
I'm already running elog 3.1.4 on my personal machine I use for configuration development and testing and it seems to work well. The config file is pretty simple and seems to work with 2.9.2 on the at-sea machines, but I don't want to run into any suprises if there ends up being a compatibility issue at sea.
|
|
|
|
|
69835
|
Wed Sep 25 14:21:33 2024 |
| David Pilgram | David.pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Re: Looking for version update advice |
I use linux elog, and if you upgrade to v3.x.x, it's difficult to go back to v2.9.x. This is because the log files get grouped in year sub directories at v3.x.x.
In 2.9.x, the logfiles are store as (made up example) /home/logfiles/yymmdda.log
In 3.x.x they are stored as /home/logfiles/2024/24mmdda.log /home/logfiles/2023/23mmdda.log etc. I think I got the labelling of the subdirectories correct, Stefan will no doubt correct if I am wrong.
I assume the same is true for the Windows version as it would be weird for a split in the program by OS for something important but trivial to impliment for all OS.
It's a bore to sort that out if you have to revert to 2.9.x - I know, I've done it - but I don't recall any change in format in the individual yymmdda.log files with an early v3.x.x version I tried. There may be additions to the log files made in much more recent v3.1.x or so versions, but I guess you are ok with whatever they may be as you've checked the change log.
Patrick Upson wrote: |
Thanks. I did eveuntaully find the change log and made the decision to upgrade the at-sea machines. So far the configuration file we update for each mission still works. I have a copy of the 2.9.2 installer that if something catostrophic happens I can remove the new version and take it back, but I don't think it'll be a problem. We archive logbooks at the end of a mission, but each mission basically starts from a fresh install like state anyway.
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
If 3.1.4 runs safely on your laptop, there should be no problem to update the 2.9.2 one. But first do it on a copy of your logbooks from the at-sea. The get converted automatically into a newer format but that should be transparent.
On the other hand you don't really need a new system if your old installation works fine and you don't need any of hte new features.
The changelog ist here: https://elog.psi.ch/elog/download/ChangeLog
Stefan
Patrick Upson wrote: |
I've inherited a position that includes deploying elog for an at-sea mission. Once at sea there's no gauntee of internet connection so I have to be sure things are going to work before hand. The machines I currently have (we have several backup machines) are running elog version 2.9.2 and I'm looking for a change log, or feature list to determine if it's safe to update the at-sea laptops to the latest version of elog.
On one hand, I could leave things as they are and I'm sure it will just work, on the other hand, I hate seeing things get out of date to the point that something just stops working some day and there's no ability to get support for old software.
I'm already running elog 3.1.4 on my personal machine I use for configuration development and testing and it seems to work well. The config file is pretty simple and seems to work with 2.9.2 on the at-sea machines, but I don't want to run into any suprises if there ends up being a compatibility issue at sea.
|
|
|
|
69834
|
Wed Sep 25 13:26:07 2024 |
| Patrick Upson | Tahpatrick.upson@dfo-mpo.gc.ca | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Re: Looking for version update advice |
Thanks. I did eveuntaully find the change log and made the decision to upgrade the at-sea machines. So far the configuration file we update for each mission still works. I have a copy of the 2.9.2 installer that if something catostrophic happens I can remove the new version and take it back, but I don't think it'll be a problem. We archive logbooks at the end of a mission, but each mission basically starts from a fresh install like state anyway.
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
If 3.1.4 runs safely on your laptop, there should be no problem to update the 2.9.2 one. But first do it on a copy of your logbooks from the at-sea. The get converted automatically into a newer format but that should be transparent.
On the other hand you don't really need a new system if your old installation works fine and you don't need any of hte new features.
The changelog ist here: https://elog.psi.ch/elog/download/ChangeLog
Stefan
Patrick Upson wrote: |
I've inherited a position that includes deploying elog for an at-sea mission. Once at sea there's no gauntee of internet connection so I have to be sure things are going to work before hand. The machines I currently have (we have several backup machines) are running elog version 2.9.2 and I'm looking for a change log, or feature list to determine if it's safe to update the at-sea laptops to the latest version of elog.
On one hand, I could leave things as they are and I'm sure it will just work, on the other hand, I hate seeing things get out of date to the point that something just stops working some day and there's no ability to get support for old software.
I'm already running elog 3.1.4 on my personal machine I use for configuration development and testing and it seems to work well. The config file is pretty simple and seems to work with 2.9.2 on the at-sea machines, but I don't want to run into any suprises if there ends up being a compatibility issue at sea.
|
|
|
69833
|
Wed Sep 25 13:19:29 2024 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | commit 2eba8869 | Re: elog sprintf() buffer overflows on ubuntu-22 |
> I get the following compiler warnings about sprintf() buffer overflows. I suggest sprintf() should be replaced by std::string msprintf() from
> midas. K.O.
I started to convert some sprintf() to snprintf(), but I still have 824 cases to go... Ideally, all should be converted to std::string. Will be some job for my retirement ;-)
Stefan |
69832
|
Wed Sep 25 13:17:06 2024 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Re: Looking for version update advice |
If 3.1.4 runs safely on your laptop, there should be no problem to update the 2.9.2 one. But first do it on a copy of your logbooks from the at-sea. The get converted automatically into a newer format but that should be transparent.
On the other hand you don't really need a new system if your old installation works fine and you don't need any of hte new features.
The changelog ist here: https://elog.psi.ch/elog/download/ChangeLog
Stefan
Patrick Upson wrote: |
I've inherited a position that includes deploying elog for an at-sea mission. Once at sea there's no gauntee of internet connection so I have to be sure things are going to work before hand. The machines I currently have (we have several backup machines) are running elog version 2.9.2 and I'm looking for a change log, or feature list to determine if it's safe to update the at-sea laptops to the latest version of elog.
On one hand, I could leave things as they are and I'm sure it will just work, on the other hand, I hate seeing things get out of date to the point that something just stops working some day and there's no ability to get support for old software.
I'm already running elog 3.1.4 on my personal machine I use for configuration development and testing and it seems to work well. The config file is pretty simple and seems to work with 2.9.2 on the at-sea machines, but I don't want to run into any suprises if there ends up being a compatibility issue at sea.
|
|
69831
|
Tue Sep 24 19:38:23 2024 |
| Gabriel Lopez | gabelopez@bnl.gov | Bug report | Linux | elog-3.1.4-3 | Catgegory filtering |
Currently have multiple logbooks hosted with elogd. One book is having an issue with Categories. The user regulary uses the category filtering to see one subject for the whole month. This past week it hasn't been working properly. When choosing a drop down category to filter there are not logs found. I've notice the fields under the categories change randomly. Sometimes it would add a % sign where there should be --. Some other fields go from displaying -- Subject -- to just the dashes, thats when the filtered eLogs do not show. Clearing out the erroneous characters can eventually load the specified logs. Has anyone else seen this? Should I just upgrade the system and hope for the best?
PS. while writing this I was able to mitigate the issue by removing the troubled fields from the quick filter section. I'm pretty sure this will not be an issue for my end user but any input is appreciated. |
69829
|
Fri Sep 20 16:24:37 2024 |
| Frank Baptista | caffeinejazz@gmail.com | Question | Windows | V3.1.5 | Is the Windows Binary/Installer now compiled for Windows 11? |
Hi all,
Quick question -- I was wondering if the current Windows Binary/Installer is now compiled for compatibility for Windows 11?
I did look through the Forum, but the the answer wasn't really clear.
Thanks!
Frank B. |