> I would like to increase the spacing between 'MOptions' choices. I have
> created a new theme and have been playing with the CSS stylesheet. But can't
> find how to increase this spacing. Having lots of fun otherwise!

Intersting question (meaning: I don't have an answer... (;-) )

The class which applies there is "attribvalue". You can increase the padding for
that class, but that only increases the space between all options and the cell
border, but not between them. I could put each MOption in a separate cell of a
subtable. Then one could increase the padding between them, but the layout would
be fixed, meaning that they are always left-to-right. As you can see in this
forum, the MOptions nicely place below each other if the screen is too narrow.
This functionality would be lost.

Maybe someone else has a clever solution?

> I have defined a new field called "Record Date" to accept the dates from a
> previous logging system. I am not too concerned with the timestamp
> associated with these old imported entries. But for new entries...
> There is no way I am able enter/edit the time into my new field. They all
> show as having a time of 12:00. What am I doing wrong? Here is a portion of
> my config

Date is "date", and not "date-time" unfortunately. There is no way right now to
enter a time. I plan however to add a new format "datetime", which allows that
option. So stay tuned.

- Stefan

Stefan,

Oh. OK. I will keep tuned. It would be quite useful to have.

Mark
> > I have defined a new field called "Record Date" to accept the dates from a
> > previous logging system. I am not too concerned with the timestamp
> > associated with these old imported entries. But for new entries...
> > There is no way I am able enter/edit the time into my new field. They all
> > show as having a time of 12:00. What am I doing wrong? Here is a portion of
> > my config
> 
> Date is "date", and not "date-time" unfortunately. There is no way right now to
> enter a time. I plan however to add a new format "datetime", which allows that
> option. So stay tuned.
> 
> - Stefan

> Stefan, the validation still fails on the ampersand ...
> here is an example of your online Demo elog:
> http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/920

Ok, I fixed that, the validation link above show a valid page.

> I would like to create a paper waste logbook. I need to have a column that 
> shows a weight in pounds and another column with a calculation from those 
> pounds to dollars.  pounds x $4.00 = cost  I was wondering if this was 
> possible? 
> 
> All other fields would be just Date, Batch#, Operator, Reason, Process 
> Operator, Manager, Lbs, and Cost,  I would also like to total this cost if 
> possible, on a search selected basis. Similar to Excel.

Unfortunately not. But your request is on the wishlist since some time, I added
your vote.

> - Irestarted the daemon
> - attached strace to it
> - requested the list for a testin logbook, few entries some quite big images 
>   (two thumbnails, the other are old images get resized my the browser)
> - repeted previous point a couple of times
> - press F5 (mozilla-firefox)  the browser hangs 4ever
> - stop the load
> - repeat point 3, all right
> - F5 => hangs
> - F5 => hangs

I tried to reproduce this problem, but everything was fine. This problem was never
reported by anyone else as well.

> It seems that uploading files with spaces in the name *now* works well... so the
> problem should be somewhere in the handling of existing attachments, not rised when
> the attachment is uploaded with the current version of elog ... it's quite strange

Can you send me one of this old xxxxxxa.log files which causes that crash, I can then fix
it in elogd.c ...

> > > > Logins work OK if the username/password is valid.  However, if I try to login
> > > > with invalid authentication, the server crashes.  If I turn off the protect
> > > > selection page, then invalid authentication does not crash elogd.
> > > 
> > > Ok, it's me, Speedy Gonzales again (as Emiliano says... (;-))
> > > 
> > > I fixed that as well and committed the changes.
> > 
> > That seems to do the trick!  Thanks, Steve
> 
> Hi,
> where can I find this correction for ELOG?
> thanks a lot :o)

It's under CVS. You have to recompile the executable yourself, or you wait for the next
release (;-)