Re: UTC time, posted by Luca on Thu Jan 12 02:35:02 2017
|
Any suggestion?
Luca
wrote:
Dear Steve, |
|
Re: UTC time, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 12 08:28:45 2017
|
The INSERT CURRENT TIME/DATE button is not affected by this setting.
Luca
wrote:
Dear Steve, |
|
Re: UTC time, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Thu Jan 12 09:10:06 2017
|
Hi Luca,
if you want to change all datetime properties to UTC time, then you'll just need to set the timezone on the server to UTC, before elogd is
started. |
"No SMTP host defined in [global] section of configuration file", posted by Luca on Wed Jan 18 05:25:44 2017
|
Hi,
I started re-using after a month an elog on my linux machine and, without any apparent reason since I did not used the machine at all in the
last month, every time I try to submit a post I get the following error |
|
Re: "No SMTP host defined in [global] section of configuration file", posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jan 18 10:25:20 2017
|
These problems usually come when you are using a different configuration file that the one you think you are using. Note that you explicitly can tell
elogd to use a specific configuation file with the "-c" flag. Also make sure to restart elogd after major changes.
Luca |
|
More than 100 attributes , posted by JD on Wed Jun 29 16:07:32 2016
|
I am modifying the elogd.cfg automatically with a script. The Script fetches a list of systems from a LDAP database and writes them into an "Options"
line in the elog.cfg.
Everything worked fine, until we hit the critical number of 100 attributes. I saw this is also stated in the manual. |
|
Re: More than 100 attributes , posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jun 29 16:58:15 2016
|
The limit is in the variable
#define MAX_N_ATTR 100
in elogd.c. If you increase it and recompile, it could work, but at some time you will get a stack overflow since arrays with that size are dynamically |
|
Re: More than 100 attributes , posted by JD on Thu Jun 30 14:00:43 2016
|
Thank you Stefan, I think then I will leave it at the default value. I need a stable Systen
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
The limit is in the variable |