elogd runs by a user but not by root, posted by Dongwook Jang on Tue Apr 28 21:25:31 2009
|
Hi,
I really don't understand why elogd cannot run by root but it runs by a user.
I've put elog deamon in /etc/init.d. So it didn't bring up, but it runs if I run it by user interactively. |
Re: elogd runs by a user but not by root, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 29 07:52:57 2009
|
Dongwook Jang wrote:
|
|
Re: elogd runs by a user but not by root, posted by Dongwook Jang on Wed Apr 29 18:20:38 2009
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: elogd runs by a user but not by root, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 30 08:40:43 2009
|
Dongwook Jang wrote:
Hi, |
|
Re: elogd runs by a user but not by root, posted by Dongwook Jang on Thu Apr 30 20:49:03 2009
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Database Like - ELOG Format, posted by mike cianci on Wed Apr 29 12:28:13 2009
|
Stefan,
I am using the Database Like - ELOG format and on the list page, the the last two columns (on the right side) are, "Text" and "Attachments
(the paperclip)". |
|
Re: Database Like - ELOG Format, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 30 08:48:01 2009
|
mike cianci wrote:
Stefan, |
|
Error: Failed dependencies: , posted by Carl Shirey on Wed Nov 12 16:41:44 2008
|
I went to upgrade to the new version of elog I receive a error message that is.
error: Failed dependencies: |
|
Re: Error: Failed dependencies: , posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Nov 17 10:23:35 2008
|
Carl Shirey wrote:
|
|
Re: Error: Failed dependencies: , posted by Carl Shirey on Mon Nov 17 19:56:04 2008
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: Error: Failed dependencies: , posted by Rob Snihur on Tue Apr 28 05:53:19 2009
|
Carl Shirey wrote:
|
|
Re: Error: Failed dependencies: , posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 28 07:53:37 2009
|
Rob Snihur wrote:
|
mail to localhost?, posted by Mike on Fri Apr 17 22:44:58 2009
|
Initially I thought you had to specify a port number after localhost for emailing.
As it turns out just putting "localhost" as the email server in the elog config
file works just fine. We have a strange problem where our elog server is running. |
|
Re: mail to localhost?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Apr 24 12:25:16 2009
|
Mike wrote:
|
|
Is there a way to import old log messages, posted by Joseph Le on Tue Apr 21 16:29:23 2009
|
I update my elog from version 2.7.5 to 2.7.6 and mistakenly replace configuration file. so i have to reconfigure everything from ground up. when
my elog back online, old log messages are not show up. is there a way to import old log messages from old log book to new one.
|
|
Re: Is there a way to import old log messages, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Apr 24 09:03:05 2009
|
Joseph Le wrote:
|
|
Config so that users can delete only their own entries?, posted by Dennis Seitz on Wed Apr 15 17:57:19 2009
|
I've tried
Deny_Delete = All
|
|
Re: Config so that users can delete only their own entries?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 16 08:34:03 2009
|
[quote="Dennis Seitz"] I've tried
Deny_Delete = All
|
|
Re: Config so that users can delete only their own entries?, posted by Dennis Seitz on Sat Apr 18 00:33:53 2009
|
Thanks for reminding me of that, it will do fine. A suggestion: Separate Restrict Edit into Restrict Edit and Restrict Delete or some functional equivalent.
Then we have the choice to restrict one or the other or both. Is that worth doing?
|
|
ROptions value changed in the edit page, posted by Gabriele Sirri on Wed Apr 15 11:43:14 2009
|
When ROptions items contain the same substring and this substring is also an ROptions item (ex: notdone,
done), the value of the entry could change in the edit page.
It depends on the item order in the config file.
|
|
Re: ROptions value changed in the edit page, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 15 12:56:18 2009
|
> When ROptions items contain the same substring and this substring is also an ROptions item (ex: notdone,
> done), the value of the entry could change in the edit page.
> It depends on the item order in the config file.
|
Long cookie content is not handled properly., posted by Simon Patton on Tue Apr 14 22:51:15 2009
|
I discovered the infinite loop in 2.7.5 which can happen when a cookie's content is longer that the cookie array
designed to hold it. I also note that this issue has been addressed in 2.7.6, but the solution does not appear
to be correct and it can end up completely confusing the cookie extraction.
|
|
Re: Long cookie content is not handled properly., posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 15 09:26:37 2009
|
[quote="Simon Patton"]I discovered the infinite loop in 2.7.5 which can happen when a cookie's content is longer that the cookie array
designed to hold it. I also note that this issue has been addressed in 2.7.6, but the solution does not appear
to be correct and it can end up completely confusing the cookie extraction.
|