ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
68600
|
Tue Apr 11 22:44:40 2017 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 3.1.2-7933898 | Re: rename menu commands | Hm, maybe my question is silly, but why don't you just use the "Duplicate" command instead of renaming and misusing "Copy to"??
Here is the relevant excerpt from the documentation (https://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html#general):
Menu commands = <list>
This option specifies the menu commands displayed on top of a single logbook page. For certain installations, it can be useful to disable some commands. Following commands are possible:
- New - Enter new logbook entry
- Edit - Edit current logbook entry
- Delete - Delete current logbook entry
- Reply - Submit a reply to current entry
- Duplicate - Duplicate the current entry with the possibility to change some values
- [...]
- Copy to - Copy entry to other logbook
- [...]
The commands are always in English, independent of the language = ... setting, and are automatically translated into the specified language.
If this option is not present, following default is used:
Menu commands = List, New, Edit, Delete, Reply, Duplicate, Find, Config, Help
Francois Cloutier wrote: |
Hi !
I do have an setup were I would like to rename the menu command but keeping their fonction. Namely, I would like to rename the "copy to" button to "Duplicate" since thats the option I would like to put in place ( Copy to = Same logbook only).
I tried to do so with css but it is not possible since the button doesn't have a specific id... Would you have another solution ?
Thanks for your help !
|
|
68601
|
Wed Apr 12 13:52:34 2017 |
| Francois Cloutier | Francois@fcmail.ca | Comment | Windows | 3.1.2-7933898 | Re: rename menu commands | Somehow, I've missed to see that option :)
Thanks :)
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Hm, maybe my question is silly, but why don't you just use the "Duplicate" command instead of renaming and misusing "Copy to"??
Here is the relevant excerpt from the documentation (https://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html#general):
Menu commands = <list>
This option specifies the menu commands displayed on top of a single logbook page. For certain installations, it can be useful to disable some commands. Following commands are possible:
- New - Enter new logbook entry
- Edit - Edit current logbook entry
- Delete - Delete current logbook entry
- Reply - Submit a reply to current entry
- Duplicate - Duplicate the current entry with the possibility to change some values
- [...]
- Copy to - Copy entry to other logbook
- [...]
The commands are always in English, independent of the language = ... setting, and are automatically translated into the specified language.
If this option is not present, following default is used:
Menu commands = List, New, Edit, Delete, Reply, Duplicate, Find, Config, Help
Francois Cloutier wrote: |
Hi !
I do have an setup were I would like to rename the menu command but keeping their fonction. Namely, I would like to rename the "copy to" button to "Duplicate" since thats the option I would like to put in place ( Copy to = Same logbook only).
I tried to do so with css but it is not possible since the button doesn't have a specific id... Would you have another solution ?
Thanks for your help !
|
|
|
68602
|
Wed Apr 12 14:00:58 2017 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Comment | Windows | 3.1.2-7933898 | Re: rename menu commands | So did I [thankful there is no shame face icon].
Francois Cloutier wrote: |
Somehow, I've missed to see that option :)
Thanks :)
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Hm, maybe my question is silly, but why don't you just use the "Duplicate" command instead of renaming and misusing "Copy to"??
Here is the relevant excerpt from the documentation (https://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html#general):
Menu commands = <list>
This option specifies the menu commands displayed on top of a single logbook page. For certain installations, it can be useful to disable some commands. Following commands are possible:
- New - Enter new logbook entry
- Edit - Edit current logbook entry
- Delete - Delete current logbook entry
- Reply - Submit a reply to current entry
- Duplicate - Duplicate the current entry with the possibility to change some values
- [...]
- Copy to - Copy entry to other logbook
- [...]
The commands are always in English, independent of the language = ... setting, and are automatically translated into the specified language.
If this option is not present, following default is used:
Menu commands = List, New, Edit, Delete, Reply, Duplicate, Find, Config, Help
Francois Cloutier wrote: |
Hi !
I do have an setup were I would like to rename the menu command but keeping their fonction. Namely, I would like to rename the "copy to" button to "Duplicate" since thats the option I would like to put in place ( Copy to = Same logbook only).
I tried to do so with css but it is not possible since the button doesn't have a specific id... Would you have another solution ?
Thanks for your help !
|
|
|
|
67205
|
Wed Feb 22 13:18:37 2012 |
| Adam | dellzoid@hotmail.com | Question | Linux | 2.7.8 | Re: redirect permission |
Adam wrote: |
Hi All,
Perhaps a trivial question but some issues have arisen accessing my long-running elog with SSL enabled. I suspect firewalls and browser updates are involved and I do not have the time or experience to diagnose and debug such a potential black-hole of difficulties. Instead I am looking for a quick fix, and the first step - switching off sll - seems to work. Now I would like to use redirect so that the elog is running under apache, however this is where I have stumbled; I have passwords so the plan is to eventually secure using apache. Apache works fine and is running pages on ports 80 and 443, although I seem unable to redirect the elog (port 8080). Following the instructions on the administrators guide I get:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /elog/ on this server.
The page is found at least so my redirect is doing something, and I suspect the solution is trivial, though I'm not too sure where to start.
-------------------
Also, what is the best practice for updating one's elog version. I originally installed using a tarball.
|
Still struggling with this issue, if anyone has managed to solve it let me know. I've done the obvious and checked ownership/ permissions of the elog folders and they are exactly the same as etc/var/www, which is working in apache. |
1618
|
Mon Jan 23 10:57:45 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.1 | Re: redirect errors via apache2 | > Since elog 2.6.0 we cannot redirect our elog via apache2.
>
> in apache2.conf we have (had for a long time):
> Redirect permanent /elog http://elog.oursite.com/elog/
> ProxyPass /elog/ http://elog.oursite.com:8080/
>
> When visiting the url, this results in:
> The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
> The proxy server could not handle the request GET /elog/myelog/.
>
> After testing we found that ELOG V2.6.0-beta2 works just fine.
> 2.6.0 stable crashes after visiting a redirected url.
>
> Running on debian sarge
Have you tried 2.6.1. I released it just recently, so I don't know when it will be available for Debian. Have you
checked that your "URL = xxx" statement in the config file is correct? I see above "myelog", while the proxy
passes requests to "elog". |
1619
|
Mon Jan 23 11:18:48 2006 |
| djek | djek@xs4all.nl | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.1 | Re: redirect errors via apache2 | > > Since elog 2.6.0 we cannot redirect our elog via apache2.
> >
> > in apache2.conf we have (had for a long time):
> > Redirect permanent /elog http://elog.oursite.com/elog/
> > ProxyPass /elog/ http://elog.oursite.com:8080/
> >
> > When visiting the url, this results in:
> > The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
> > The proxy server could not handle the request GET /elog/myelog/.
> >
> > After testing we found that ELOG V2.6.0-beta2 works just fine.
> > 2.6.0 stable crashes after visiting a redirected url.
> >
> > Running on debian sarge
>
> Have you tried 2.6.1. I released it just recently, so I don't know when it will be available for Debian.
No it doesn't work with 2.6.1. I hoped it would be fixed, but I should have reported it sooner.
I compiled 2.6.1 myself.
The original version was a debian package, after that, we compile elog ourselves and copy elogd manually over the old
version. Just to stay up-to-date.
> Have you checked that your "URL = xxx" statement in the config file is correct? I see above "myelog", while the
proxy passes requests to "elog".
I changed our urls, just to be safe.
myelog is a 'sublogbook', like forum here. http://elog.oursite.com/elog/myelog
We are running V2.6.0-beta2 and it runs fine, without any alterations to our config files.
All previous versions runned fine too.
update:
After further testing on a different server, it seems to be an issue with the proxy and the proxy_http modules in sarge.
after loading and unloading proxy_http this is the error:
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. |
69508
|
Mon Apr 18 21:01:23 2022 |
| Konstantin Olchanski | olchansk@triumf.ca | Question | Linux | not known | Re: recovery of elog from backup disk | unfortunately instructions do not exist to cover every possible situation.
but in general, to migrate elog to a new machine, I would say do this:
- on new machine, install new elog from scratch
- copy the old elogs from "logbooks" on the backup disk to the new elog "logbooks"
- merge the config file by hand (this may require a few tries)
feel free to ask for more help with any of these steps here.
K.O. |
69516
|
Thu Apr 21 03:45:20 2022 |
| neerajan nepal | nepal1n@cmich.edu | Question | Linux | not known | Re: recovery of elog from backup disk | > unfortunately instructions do not exist to cover every possible situation.
>
> but in general, to migrate elog to a new machine, I would say do this:
> - on new machine, install new elog from scratch
> - copy the old elogs from "logbooks" on the backup disk to the new elog "logbooks"
> - merge the config file by hand (this may require a few tries)
>
> feel free to ask for more help with any of these steps here.
> K.O.
Thank you so much. It worked this way. |
|