Re: number of attachments limit, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jan 7 16:46:54 2013
|
Devin Bougie wrote:
Hello, |
|
Re: notification error services in CentOS 6.5, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jan 13 10:07:02 2015
|
The init script supplied with elog was originally written for Redhat. It seems like CentOS has slightly changed the init daemon management, but I'm
not an expert on that, nor do I have CentOS installed. If somebody comes with a fixed elogd.init for CentOS, I'm happy to include that in the distribution.
/Stefan |
Re: notification error services in CentOS 6.5, posted by Darren Hollinrake on Sun Sep 18 03:31:42 2016 
|
The quick fix I found was to uncomment line 10 in the init.d file. (This was tested on a CentOS 6.8 AWS instance.)
. /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions
This will allow the status command to function properly. |
|
Re: notification error services in CentOS 6.5, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Sep 21 17:23:15 2016
|
Ok, I will include this patch in the distribution.
Stefan
Darren |
|
Re: not proper HTML, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Sep 8 11:32:42 2003
|
> There are some errors in the generated HTML. Most of the time
> the browser renders everything correctly but sometimes not. Please
> check especially (http://validator.w3.org/):
|
|
Re: no availability of el8 and el9 rpm, posted by Laurent Jean-Rigaud on Wed Feb 21 11:15:38 2024
|
Hi,
EPEL retired the ELOG package for security reason.
You can build from GIT source as described in elog:Forum/69732 . |
|
Re: no availability of el8 and el9 rpm, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Wed Feb 21 21:20:56 2024
|
> EPEL retired the ELOG package for security reason
no, this is not what happened, we (I) requested removal of elog packages from epel, debian and ubuntu because they had obsolete pre-cve (insecure)
|
|
Re: no availability of el8 and el9 rpm, posted by Laurent Jean-Rigaud on Thu Feb 22 00:53:26 2024
|
> > EPEL retired the ELOG package for security reason
>
> no, this is not what happened, we (I) requested removal of elog packages from epel, debian and ubuntu because they had obsolete pre-cve (insecure)
|