Problems with elog client, posted by Yoshio Imai on Wed Apr 9 14:41:12 2008
|
Hi!
Since our upgrade to elog 2.7.3, it is not possible any more to edit an existing elog entry using the elog client with -e <id> option. |
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 9 23:03:53 2008
|
Yoshio Imai wrote:
Since our upgrade to elog 2.7.3, it is not possible any more to edit an existing elog entry using the elog |
|
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Yoshio Imai on Thu Apr 10 14:21:13 2008
|
I have tried the new revision, recompiling both client and server.
Unfortunately, the overall situation has not changed. We can still create new entries using the [I]elog[/I] client, but editing an existing entry still
does not work. However, thanks to your patch, the [I]-v[/I] option now works again for the client side:
|
|
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 10 15:39:26 2008
|
[quote="Yoshio Imai"]
[CODE]> elog -s -h elog -p 443 -l current -u <user> <password> -e 1 "EDIT THIS ENTRY" -v
Successfully connected to host elog, port 443
|
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Yoshio Imai on Thu Apr 10 15:56:12 2008
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]As I wrote in my previous message, the "SSL part has not been tested" (=means: does not work).[/quote]
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I was probably confused because the creation of new entries already worked, even with SSL.
|
|
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 15 20:34:49 2008
|
[quote="Yoshio Imai"]Another thing: I have noticed that when using conditional preset texts, the "Preset Text =" statements have to be declared for each
logbook of a logbook group; it is not sufficient to only declare it in the "[global]" section of the logbook group. This means that we only need to declare
the conditions once, e.g.
|
|
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Yoshio Imai on Thu Apr 17 19:11:36 2008
|
I have tried your sample config file, and this one also works for me.
The problem arises when using top groups. I have produced a minimal config file including a top group, of the form
[CODE]
|
|
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 17 21:23:06 2008
|
[quote="Yoshio Imai"]The problem arises when using top groups.[/quote]
Uff, that was a tough one. Thanks to your detailed analysis I could reproduce the problem. It indeed only happens with conditional 'preset text' under |
|
Re: Problems with elog client, posted by Yoshio Imai on Fri Apr 18 14:17:52 2008
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]I fixed that in SVN revision 2103, please download and test it.[/quote]
I just downloaded and tested it. It works!!
|
Custom Links in each column, in the display list?, posted by Don Perrea on Thu Apr 17 19:56:41 2008
|
Using the "Link Display =" I can turn of the link to each individual entry, however, I would like to have a custom link in one
of my columns. Is this possible?
|
Re: Custom Links in each column, in the display list?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 17 20:22:30 2008 
|
Don Perrea wrote:
Using the "Link Display =" I can turn of the link to each individual entry, however, |
Sticky entries?, posted by Peter Freeman on Sun Apr 6 06:17:00 2008
|
Hi, I'm evaluate currently if we can use ELOG as an shiftbook. So far I like ELOG very much, but I got a question.
Is it possible to have sticky message entries? Entries that always show up on top of the others. Thats for important entries that
are valit for multiple shifts. |
|
Re: Sticky entries?, posted by Peter Freeman on Thu Apr 10 01:33:07 2008
|
Peter
Freeman wrote:
Hi, I'm evaluate |
|
Re: Sticky entries?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 10 07:48:08 2008
|
Peter Freeman wrote:
|
|
Re: Sticky entries?, posted by Peter Freeman on Fri Apr 11 00:15:42 2008
|
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: Sticky entries?, posted by Peter Freeman on Sat Apr 12 05:21:11 2008
|
Peter
Freeman wrote:
|
|
Re: Sticky entries?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Apr 14 08:46:41 2008
|
Peter Freeman wrote:
EDIT: Just downloaded the latest version and |
attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Dennis Seitz on Tue Apr 1 21:24:17 2008
|
It would be nice to have the option of including an attachment indicator column in summary view to show if an entry has any attachments.
Thanks. |
|
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Apr 4 22:06:48 2008
|
Dennis Seitz wrote:
It would be nice to have the option of including an attachment indicator column in summary view to show if |
|
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Edmundo T Rodriguez on Fri Apr 4 22:53:17 2008
|
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Apr 7 10:01:27 2008
|
Edmundo T Rodriguez wrote:
|
|
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Dennis Seitz on Sat Apr 5 00:43:21 2008
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Grant Jeffcote on Sat Apr 12 22:04:58 2008
|
Hi Stefan,
When using 2.7.3-2095 I can't seem to get the paperclip/s to show, just an additional field in the summary view (named Attachments)
with the attachment file names below? Am I missing something? |
|
Re: attachment indicator in summary view, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sun Apr 13 16:04:09 2008
|
Grant Jeffcote wrote:
When using 2.7.3-2095 I can't seem to get the paperclip/s to show, just an additional field in the summary |
|
Manual installing elog as service on Windows, posted by Arno Teunisse on Sat Apr 12 16:37:44 2008
|
Hello
Sometimes it can come in handy to start a temporary elog service on the Windows platform. ( Maybe for testing purposes )
You can use the SC.exe utility to do that. If it is not on you're system you may download it from : ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/reskit/win2000/sc.zip |
|
e-mail format, posted by Bill Qualls on Tue Apr 1 21:07:39 2008
|
I "upgraded" from v2.6.? to v2.7.3. By "upgrade", I mean "copy all files to a different computer, then run the
installer". e-mail messages received from my v2.6 instance look nice. The messages look like HTML tables with blue and green coloring.
My v2.7 instance appears to send plain text. But, when I forward the v2.7 message, the nice HTML tables appear again. Is there an e-mail formatting |
|
Re: e-mail format, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 3 08:37:27 2008
|
Bill Qualls wrote:
I "upgraded" from v2.6.? to v2.7.3. By "upgrade", I mean "copy all |
|
FCKeditor not active, posted by Kevin O'Sullivan on Mon Mar 24 19:40:03 2008
|
I'm using ELOG version 2.7.3-2058 and have been trying to get FCKeditor to work. This, to my understanding from the documentation, is supposed to be
a part of elog by default after version 2.7.0 and from looking at the configuration syntax manual, it looks as though FCKeditor should be on with the default
settings. I done nothing to turn it off and none of the obvious fixes seem to do anything. I've posted the text of my configuration file below, what did |
|
Re: FCKeditor not active, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Mar 27 07:15:03 2008
|
Kevin O'Sullivan wrote:
I'm using ELOG version 2.7.3-2058 and have been trying to get FCKeditor to work. This, to my understanding |
|
Re: FCKeditor not active, posted by Alain Hugentobler on Wed Apr 2 01:27:20 2008
|
Kevin O'Sullivan wrote:
I'm using ELOG version 2.7.3-2058 and have been trying to get FCKeditor to work. This, to my understanding |
|
Re: FCKeditor not active, posted by Kevin O'Sullivan on Wed Apr 2 03:34:43 2008
|
Alain Hugentobler wrote:
|
|
Re: FCKeditor not active, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Apr 2 09:19:55 2008
|
Alain Hugentobler wrote:
|
|
Duplicate entry suggestion, posted by Dennis Seitz on Tue Apr 1 02:04:35 2008
|
We have configured several logbooks to allow users to duplicate an entry in another logbook, which is very useful for entries which apply to more
than one category.
However, once the entry is duplicated, subsequent revisions to the original entry are not copied to the duplicate entries. |
|
Re: Duplicate entry suggestion, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 1 08:01:02 2008
|
Dennis Seitz wrote:
We have configured several logbooks to allow users to duplicate an entry in another logbook, which |
|
Re: Duplicate entry suggestion, posted by Dennis Seitz on Tue Apr 1 20:31:26 2008
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|