Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 10 13:58:17 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]Stefan, I found the following "forkpty()" replacement for running under Solaris.[/quote]
Ok, I put your code into the current SVN revision (1656). Unfortunately I cannot try it due to the lack of a Sun. Maybe you can try and tell me if it's |
Re: Posting without logging in!, posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Fri Feb 10 16:16:11 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
Yes indeed. I fixed that in SVN revision 1655. I upgraded this server so you can try again if it works.[/quote]
|
Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform, posted by Steve Jones on Fri Feb 10 17:22:36 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]Stefan, I found the following "forkpty()" replacement for running under Solaris.[/quote]
Ok, I put your code into the current SVN revision (1656). Unfortunately I cannot try it due to the lack of a Sun. Maybe you can try and tell me if it's |
Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 10 17:29:03 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]Actually, what I will be delivering is a new Makefile with conditional compile statements plus the C code module since the example
that I provided need some cleaning. Since I don't have a Linux system on which to test the conditional compile completely I would need you to do that.
Sound ok?
|
Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform, posted by Steve Jones on Fri Feb 10 20:24:56 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]Actually, what I will be delivering is a new Makefile with conditional compile statements plus the C code module
since the example that I provided need some cleaning. Since I don't have a Linux system on which to test the conditional compile completely I would need
you to do that. Sound ok?
|
Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 10 20:29:12 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]Ok, I see what you did. I took a different route since I was not sure how the gnu linker would handle the fact that there would be
two declarations of the forkpty() function when compiled and linked under Linux. Instead, I created a separate forkpty.c module and compiled it separately.
Then, if "solaris", link it in. Otherwise, use library "util" which already has forkpty().
|
Re: email problems, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 10 21:50:27 2006
|
[quote="Chris Warner"]Do you have an ise when that will be?[/quote]
In about a week from now. |
Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform, posted by Steve Jones on Fri Feb 10 21:52:35 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]Ok, I see what you did. I took a different route since I was not sure how the gnu linker would handle the fact
that there would be two declarations of the forkpty() function when compiled and linked under Linux. Instead, I created a separate forkpty.c module and
compiled it separately. Then, if "solaris", link it in. Otherwise, use library "util" which already has forkpty().
|