Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform, posted by Steve Jones on Fri Feb 10 22:31:38 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]Ok, I see what you did. I took a different route since I was not sure how the gnu linker
would handle the fact that there would be two declarations of the forkpty() function when compiled and linked under Linux. Instead, I created a separate
forkpty.c module and compiled it separately. Then, if "solaris", link it in. Otherwise, use library "util" which already has forkpty().
|
|
Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 10 22:35:20 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]BTW, Stefan, this code in Makefile does not work on Solaris
[code]
OSTYPE = $(shell uname)
|
|
Re: compiling elog 2.6.1 on solaris platform, posted by Steve Jones on Mon Feb 13 18:22:08 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]BTW, Stefan, this code in Makefile does not work on Solaris
[code]
OSTYPE = $(shell uname)
|
|
Re: Accessing elog through two apache servers..., posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 14 13:40:49 2006
|
Hi Dimitrios,
I know where your problem is and you could actually help me in solving it. The reason of the problem is the redirection. After you login, you get redirected |
|
Re: Accessing elog through two apache servers..., posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Tue Feb 14 14:23:04 2006
|
Hi Stefan,
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
|
|
Re: Accessing elog through two apache servers..., posted by Dimitrios Tsirigkas on Tue Feb 14 16:06:28 2006
|
Hi,
The problem was coming from the fact that elog did not supports request coming from multiple hops through proxies. You got the ful string of them in the |
|
Re: CONCERN: Cross-platform compiling at risk, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 14 17:43:15 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]Stefan, I am concerned that there are becoming too many Linux dependencies in terms of required libraries and header files. Although
we have a replacement for the [code]forkpty()[/code] routine, I am running into many other dependencies, the latest of which is pty.h. Aren't there guidelines
in GCC that point out what is available cross-platform and what is not? For example, any SVR# (System Five, Release XX) based Unix will not include the |
|
Re: CONCERN: Cross-platform compiling at risk, posted by Steve Jones on Tue Feb 14 22:31:08 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]Stefan, I am concerned that there are becoming too many Linux dependencies in terms of required
libraries and header files. Although we have a replacement for the [code]forkpty()[/code] routine, I am running into many other dependencies, the latest
of which is pty.h. Aren't there guidelines in GCC that point out what is available cross-platform and what is not? For example, any SVR# (System Five, |