Quick Filter and boolean option question, posted by Arno Teunisse on Fri Oct 19 22:59:31 2007
|
; BUG : When "Contract" is at the second position in the "Attributes".
; We See in the "Quick Filter" a pulldown showing "Serial Number" with only "0" or "1" ,
; this is NOT what i want or is expected !!!
|
Re: Quick Filter and boolean option question, posted by Arno Teunisse on Sun Oct 21 00:17:34 2007
|
[quote="Arno Teunisse"]; BUG : When "Contract" is at the second position in the "Attributes".
; We See in the "Quick Filter" a pulldown showing "Serienummer" with only "0" or "1" ,
; this is NOT what i want or is expected !!!
|
Re: Quick Filter and boolean option question, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sun Oct 21 12:21:09 2007
|
[quote="Arno Teunisse"]Because I did not get an answer i think i must ask it in an other way[/quote]
The reason you did not get an answer was not that you asked the wrong way, but simply that I'm pretty busy these days. So just be patient, I won't forget |
Re: Quick Filter and boolean option question, posted by Arno Teunisse on Sun Oct 21 22:51:07 2007
|
Thanks Stefan , i'll wait. Sorry.
|
Re: Quick Filter and boolean option question, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Oct 22 17:27:45 2007
|
[quote="Arno Teunisse"]When "Contract" is at the second position in the "Attributes".
We See in the "Quick Filter" a pulldown showing "Serial Number" with only "0" or "1" ,
this is NOT what i want or is expected !!![/quote]
|
Add date and time stamp to file upload, posted by Fergus Lynch on Thu Oct 4 12:03:30 2007
|
Hi,
Been using ELOG for a couple of years now and I am very impressed with its functionality.
|
Re: Add date and time stamp to file upload, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Oct 4 17:19:56 2007
|
[quote="Fergus Lynch"]I would like to request a new feature - add date and time stamp to file upload. We use ELOG (amongst other things!) as a change log
and this would really allow allow more accurate records to be kept. For instance we upload router config files (to record changes)and having the exact
upload date would be a big enhancement, especially when there are a lot of attachments.[/quote]
|
Re: Add date and time stamp to file upload, posted by Fergus Lynch on Tue Oct 9 11:48:17 2007
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Fergus Lynch"]I would like to request a new feature - add date and time stamp to file upload. We use ELOG (amongst other things!)
as a change log and this would really allow allow more accurate records to be kept. For instance we upload router config files (to record changes)and
having the exact upload date would be a big enhancement, especially when there are a lot of attachments.[/quote]
|
Re: Add date and time stamp to file upload, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Oct 19 21:44:00 2007
|
[quote="Fergus Lynch"]Hi, I think this would be great new functionality, so I would propose the date/time stamp for an uploaded file was placed just after
the file size text that appears at the far right hand side of all attachments.[/quote]
|
default css style , posted by Arno Teunisse on Thu Oct 18 23:18:03 2007
|
The default tiny.css has a bug in it.
It's calling a class that does not exists. The class name is : list1h and list2h. So I added :
|
Re: default css style , posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Oct 19 09:08:06 2007
|
[quote="Arno Teunisse"]The default tiny.css has a bug in it.
It's calling a class that does not exists. The class name is : list1h and list2h.[/quote]
|
how to use the find calendar, posted by Arno Teunisse on Sat Oct 6 16:47:44 2007
|
Hello
In the find page you use a calendar popup from which the user can click on a date and the date boxes are filled in with the correct date. Can I use that
calendar also? If so, can you show me an example of it's usage. |
Re: how to use the find calendar, posted by Arno Teunisse on Sat Oct 6 17:15:59 2007
|
[quote="Arno Teunisse"]Hello
In the find page you use a calendar popup from which the user can click on a date and the date boxes are filled in with the correct date. Can I use that
calendar also? If so, can you show me an example of it's usage.
|
testing for the limit of the elog database , posted by Arno Teunisse on Sat Oct 6 15:39:12 2007
|
Hello
To test elog i created a very large databasefile ( 071006a.log = 39MB ) via an import.
|
Re: testing for the limit of the elog database , posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Oct 6 15:44:51 2007
|
[quote="Arno Teunisse"]So there are only 2 user defined fields in the database.
Everything works ......... but terrible slow : is there a rule of thumb for the size of the database ? [/quote]
|
Re: testing for the limit of the elog database , posted by Arno Teunisse on Sat Oct 6 15:56:13 2007
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Arno Teunisse"]So there are only 2 user defined fields in the database.
Everything works ......... but terrible slow : is there a rule of thumb for the size of the database ? [/quote]
|
Re: testing for the limit of the elog database , posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Oct 6 16:11:50 2007
|
[quote="Arno Teunisse"]By the way : my email address has changed : how do I change that ??[/quote]
Click on 'Config'. |
, posted by on Sat Oct 6 14:05:01 2007
|
I ended with 125384 entries like the one above.
|
Post appearing twice, posted by Dan Chitwood on Fri Sep 23 19:23:26 2005
|
We are having trouble on our logbook with posts appearing twice. Both posts contain the same ID number, time, etc. This most often occurs when the e-log
entry is being written for an extended period of time (ie. more than 30 minutes), but I don't know if that is the root cause of the problem. It may also
be related to posts that are edited after an initial posting. Could this be due to an improper setting in our config file? |
Re: Post appearing twice, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Oct 5 13:22:08 2005
|
[quote="Dan Chitwood"]We are having trouble on our logbook with posts appearing twice. Both posts contain the same ID number, time, etc. This most often
occurs when the e-log entry is being written for an extended period of time (ie. more than 30 minutes), but I don't know if that is the root cause of the
problem. It may also be related to posts that are edited after an initial posting. Could this be due to an improper setting in our config file?[/quote]
|
Re: Post appearing twice, posted by Alan Grant on Mon Jun 4 22:30:44 2007
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Dan Chitwood"]We are having trouble on our logbook with posts appearing twice. Both posts contain the same ID number, time,
etc. This most often occurs when the e-log entry is being written for an extended period of time (ie. more than 30 minutes), but I don't know if that
is the root cause of the problem. It may also be related to posts that are edited after an initial posting. Could this be due to an improper setting |
Re: Post appearing twice, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jun 8 10:44:14 2007
|
[quote="Alan Grant"]I was having a very similar problem. After clicking Submit, I was getting dialog box "Submit modified Elog entry?" (with Submit or Cancel
options) even though it was a new entry. Whenever I clicked Submit, it added two identical lines (except for ID), but when I clicked Cancel, it added only
one entry. This happened in both v2.6.3 and v2.6.5.[/quote]
|
Re: Post appearing twice, posted by deletoille on Tue Jun 12 11:07:39 2007
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Alan Grant"]I was having a very similar problem. After clicking Submit, I was getting dialog box "Submit modified Elog entry?"
(with Submit or Cancel options) even though it was a new entry. Whenever I clicked Submit, it added two identical lines (except for ID), but when I clicked
Cancel, it added only one entry. This happened in both v2.6.3 and v2.6.5.[/quote]
|
Re: Post appearing twice, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jun 12 17:13:28 2007
|
I finally found and fixed the problem with the help of Alan Grant. It happens when three things are used together:
[LIST=1]
[*] Locking (via [B]use lock = 1[/B])
|
Re: Post appearing twice, posted by Bertram Metz on Thu Sep 27 15:18:10 2007
|
I've observed the same behavior with attributes containing a dash. Would it be possible to allow '-' in attributes?
Bertram |
Re: Post appearing twice, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Sep 28 17:52:37 2007
|
[quote="Bertram Metz"]I've observed the same behavior with attributes containing a dash. Would it be possible to allow '-' in attributes?[/quote]
Yes. Fixed in Revision 1930. |
Too many logbooks during user registration, posted by Steve Jones on Mon Aug 6 17:43:52 2007
|
Stefan, we require registration with elog. We have quite a number of logbooks and when someone requests a login account AND elects to register with all
of the logbooks, the resulting URL is apparently too long for browsers to handle when the admins click on the link embedded in the email notification.
For example, FireFox (latest ver) appears to truncate the URL *after* submission (the correct URL is there before submission).
|
Re: Too many logbooks during user registration, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Aug 7 18:39:37 2007
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]Stefan, we require registration with elog. We have quite a number of logbooks and when someone requests a login account AND elects
to register with all of the logbooks, the resulting URL is apparently too long for browsers to handle when the admins click on the link embedded in the
email notification. For example, FireFox (latest ver) appears to truncate the URL *after* submission (the correct URL is there before submission).
|
Re: Too many logbooks during user registration, posted by Steve Jones on Tue Sep 11 15:30:11 2007
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]Stefan, we require registration with elog. We have quite a number of logbooks and when someone requests a login
account AND elects to register with all of the logbooks, the resulting URL is apparently too long for browsers to handle when the admins click on the link
embedded in the email notification. For example, FireFox (latest ver) appears to truncate the URL *after* submission (the correct URL is there before |
Re: Too many logbooks during user registration, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Sep 11 21:25:11 2007
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]So the list is shown to the one requesting the registration? Would it be possible to have an option that, when selected, simply did
not list any logbooks? I can see a customer becoming confused if they did not see their logbook listed. Just turn off the selection completely. Otherwise,
this will work but I fear will generate more questions as in "Why isn't logbook <blah> listed?"[/quote]
|