Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 178 of 807  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments  Show all entries    6451 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 177, 178, 179 ... 805, 806, 807   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Emaildown Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  1961   Mon Oct 9 22:32:11 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionAll2.6.2-1714Re: "Supress Email Notification" checkbox
Suppress email on edit has been implemented in the current SVN revision just similar to the Suppress default flag having possible values of 0, 1, 2 and 3.
  1962   Tue Oct 10 08:52:50 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows Re: Conditional E-Mail Attributes

Grant Jeffcote wrote:
My version shows V2.6.2-1699.
I noticed you have 1714, is that the latest binary or your compiled CVS release?


Try this one: http://midas/elog/download/windows/elog262-3.exe which is the most recent.
  1963   Tue Oct 10 08:56:49 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestLinux | Windows2.6.2-1714Re: Append option for elog.exe

Ben Shepherd wrote:
Hi,

Would it be possible to add an 'append' option to the elog.exe client program? I would like to be able to write a simple script for adding images into a logbook - i.e. right-click in Windows and click 'add to log', or click a button in LabVIEW or Matlab and have an image immediately added to the last log entry. There would also have to be an option to either return a list of entry IDs, or just append to the last entry. Is this possible/likely?


Unfortunately it is not simple under Windows to extend the right-click functionality. What I do is to use a snapshot program (like HoverSnap). Triggered with a definable hot key, it grabs a region of the screen and puts it into a GIF file. Then you can attach it to an elog. I agree it takes a couple of clicks, but it's still a quick thing.
  1964   Tue Oct 10 09:00:08 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestLinux | Windows2.6.2-1714Re: Turn off smileys?

Ben Shepherd wrote:
Can we please have an option to turn off the thing that changes smileys automatically into
pictures?


Two ways:

  • Submit your entry in plain mode (insted of ELCode)
  • Put a \ in front of anything which is turned into a smiley, so ;) gets converted into Wink, but \;) does not get converted
  1966   Tue Oct 10 11:27:30 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestLinux | Windows2.6.2-1714Re: Turn off smileys?

Ben Shepherd wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

  • Submit your entry in plain mode (insted of ELCode)
  • Put a \ in front of anything which is turned into a smiley, so ;) gets converted into Wink, but \;) does not get converted


I realise that's possible, but things are getting converted into smileys that aren't intended to be smileys. Specifically, when I enter a question in brackets, the end bracket is converted into a smiley. (Like this?) should be (Like this\?). That is very annoying, and to be honest, I don't need the smileys. An option to switch them off would be the best thing.


I agree that the ?) smiley is annoying, so I changed it to ?-) which should prevent it from showing up in questions in brackets. I updated this server (you can see the effect above), the modification is committed to subversion.
  1969   Tue Oct 10 11:45:22 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestLinux | Windows2.6.2-1714Re: Turn off smileys?

Ben Shepherd wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

I agree that the ?) smiley is annoying, so I changed it to ?-) which should prevent it from showing up in questions in brackets. I updated this server (you can see the effect above), the modification is committed to subversion.


Thanks a lot! I'm going to pester you though - it would be really good if there was an option to turn them off completely. Surely it can't be a huge amount of work... ?


It's not the amount of work, it the intention to minimize the number of options. If you want a switch for the smileys, the next one wants a switch for automatic hot-linking (like http://...), the next one wants that only certain ELCode options are interpreted, not others, and then we will have a mess. By changing the ?-) definition I hope I have solved most cases without another flag. So either one has the comple ELCode set, or non. In the past I had many suggestions of new flags, which I could solve somehow otherwise. If I would not have done that, the manual would be twice as long by now...
  1970   Tue Oct 10 11:47:41 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestLinux | Windows2.6.2-1714Re: Append option for elog.exe

Ben Shepherd wrote:
I think you misunderstand me. I was asking whether it would be possible for the elog command-line client program to have an "append to existing entry" option.


The elog command-line program has a -e switch to edit existing entries, but you need to know the ID of the entry.
  1973   Tue Oct 10 16:09:12 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestAll2.6.2-1714Re: 'Inline' button for attachments

Ben Shepherd wrote:
Hi,

It would be good if when you uploaded an image as an attachment, there was a button next to it that pasted the code 
[img]elog:1972/1[/img]
into the log entry. This way, it would be more easy to have inline images in a log entry.


Just hit that button:


and it does exactly what you want.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 177, 178, 179 ... 805, 806, 807   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6