Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 179 of 806  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icondown Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  1980   Wed Oct 11 11:47:29 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportWindows2.6.2-1722Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box

Gregory M. Caughey wrote:
2.) However, email notifications will be sent under all circumstances regardless of which parameter selected.


Thanks for reporting that problem. I just implemented Suppress email on edit and this could have had some side effect. I tried however to reproduce your problem and was not able to. Trying the "minimal" configuration file, the email notifications were suppressed if the check box was checked, or if Suppress default = 3. Can you check if it works with a minimal config file, and if yes, what option in your "full" config file causes this effect?
  1981   Wed Oct 11 16:03:52 2006 Reply Yoshio ImaiQuestionLinux2.6.2-1714Re: Turn off smileys?

Stefan Ritt wrote:
Put a \ in front of anything which is turned into a smiley, so ;) gets converted into Wink, but \;) does not get converted

Other suggestion: What about going the other way round and making this
\?)
the smiley and this
?)
the usual question in brackets? If there was a special sequence to announce the unusual case (i.e. the smiley), I think less people would complain about having unwanted conversions ...
  1982   Wed Oct 11 16:08:04 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.6.2-1714Re: Turn off smileys?

Yoshio Imai wrote:
Other suggestion: What about going the other way round and making this
\?)
the smiley and this
?)
the usual question in brackets? If there was a special sequence to announce the unusual case (i.e. the smiley), I think less people would complain about having unwanted conversions ...


I thought also about that, but people who are use to bulletin boards or instant messaging have the common knowledge that a ;) gives a smiley, not a \;). While it would work with the smiley button, which could insert anything, the "other" half of the people who are used to the standard smileys would complain. So I hope that ?-) is acceptable by both sides.
  1985   Thu Oct 12 16:34:07 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows2.6.2-1722Re: Error Sending Email

Ibrahim Genc wrote:
I get error message after submitting a message


Your verbose output seems to be only partial. I have modified the verbose output recently, so please update to a more recent version of elog. With 2.6.2-3 I get for example
Email from stefan.ritt@psi.ch to stefan.ritt@psi.ch, SMTP host xxx.psi.ch:
220 xxx.psi.ch xxxvs01 Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:25:17 +0200
HELO xxx.psi.ch
250 xxx.psi.ch Hello [129.129.xxx.xxx]
MAIL FROM: stefan.ritt@psi.ch
250 2.1.0 stefan.ritt@psi.ch....Sender OK
RCPT TO: <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
250 2.1.5 stefan.ritt@psi.ch
RCPT TO: <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
250 2.1.5 stefan.ritt@psi.ch
DATA
354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:25:17 +0200
To: "Stefan Ritt" <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
From: Stefan Ritt <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
User-Agent: Elog Version 2.6.2
Subject: Updated ELOG entry
X-Elog-URL: http://localhost:8080/demo/1
X-Elog-submit-type: web|elog
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">

... here comes the complete email body ....

.
250 2.6.0 <xxx.psi.ch> Queued mail for delivery
QUIT
221 2.0.0 xxx.psi.ch Service closing transmission channel
==== Return ================================
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Server: ELOG HTTP 2.6.2-1724
Connection: Keep-Alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=60, max=10
Content-Length: 20

This is of course without SMTP username. Our mail server does not support SMTP username, so I programmed this kind of "blindly".



Ibrahim Genc wrote:
Another question is; Can I change the port number of the smtp server? Some servers use another port than 25.


All server I met so far were running on port 25, so I hardcoded this in elogd.c. You can change it in the source code at line 2119:
bind_addr.sin_port = htons((short) 25);

If more people ask for this, I can make it a parameter.
  1986   Thu Oct 12 17:42:37 2006 Reply Ibrahim Gencig004@hotmail.comQuestionWindows2.6.2-1722Re: Error Sending Email

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Ibrahim Genc wrote:
I get error message after submitting a message

Your verbose output seems to be only partial. I have modified the verbose output recently, so please update to a more recent version of elog. With 2.6.2-3 I get for example


I downloaded the latest version just yesterday. I checked again now; it is version 2.6.2-3. I'll wait some time for release of new build of windows binaries. Mine differs from yours as a one build number only.

Thanks for prompt answer.
  1987   Fri Oct 13 16:59:13 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportWindows2.6.2-1722Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box

Gregory M. Caughey wrote:
Hope this helps a little...


Yepp it helped. I could reproduce your problem and fix it. Can you try elog262-4.exe (Revision 1729)?
  1988   Fri Oct 13 23:17:05 2006 Reply Ibrahim Gencig004@hotmail.comQuestionWindows2.6.2-1722Re: Error Sending Email

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Ibrahim Genc wrote:
I get error message after submitting a message


Your verbose output seems to be only partial. I have modified the verbose output recently, so please update to a more recent version of elog. With 2.6.2-3 I get for example
Email from stefan.ritt@psi.ch to stefan.ritt@psi.ch, SMTP host xxx.psi.ch:
...

Now I installed 262-4 but no change. communication seems to be stopped at the same point.


Stefan Ritt wrote:

This is of course without SMTP username. Our mail server does not support SMTP username, so I programmed this kind of "blindly".


There is a free e-mail service at mail.softhome.net. It provides smtp and pop3 services. You can use this for testing if you want.

Saluts.
--
ibrahim
  1989   Sat Oct 14 10:01:17 2006 Reply Gregory M. Caugheycaugheygm@aol.comBug reportWindows2.6.2-1722Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Gregory M. Caughey wrote:
Hope this helps a little...


Yepp it helped. I could reproduce your problem and fix it. Can you try elog262-4.exe (Revision 1729)?

Hi Stefan!
Just installed elog-2.6.2-1729 and it's working perfectly. I haven't had enough time to test it thoroughly yet but will report any problems I might find. As always thanks for your excellent work, I appreciate it.

Regards, Greg
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6