ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
1980
|
Wed Oct 11 11:47:29 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box |
Gregory M. Caughey wrote: | 2.) However, email notifications will be sent under all circumstances regardless of which parameter selected. |
Thanks for reporting that problem. I just implemented Suppress email on edit and this could have had some side effect. I tried however to reproduce your problem and was not able to. Trying the "minimal" configuration file, the email notifications were suppressed if the check box was checked, or if Suppress default = 3. Can you check if it works with a minimal config file, and if yes, what option in your "full" config file causes this effect? |
1981
|
Wed Oct 11 16:03:52 2006 |
| Yoshio Imai | | Question | Linux | 2.6.2-1714 | Re: Turn off smileys? |
Stefan Ritt wrote: | Put a \ in front of anything which is turned into a smiley, so ;) gets converted into , but \;) does not get converted |
Other suggestion: What about going the other way round and making this \?) the smiley and this ?) the usual question in brackets? If there was a special sequence to announce the unusual case (i.e. the smiley), I think less people would complain about having unwanted conversions ... |
1982
|
Wed Oct 11 16:08:04 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.6.2-1714 | Re: Turn off smileys? |
Yoshio Imai wrote: | Other suggestion: What about going the other way round and making this \?) the smiley and this ?) the usual question in brackets? If there was a special sequence to announce the unusual case (i.e. the smiley), I think less people would complain about having unwanted conversions ... |
I thought also about that, but people who are use to bulletin boards or instant messaging have the common knowledge that a ;) gives a smiley, not a \;). While it would work with the smiley button, which could insert anything, the "other" half of the people who are used to the standard smileys would complain. So I hope that ?-) is acceptable by both sides. |
1985
|
Thu Oct 12 16:34:07 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Error Sending Email |
Ibrahim Genc wrote: | I get error message after submitting a message |
Your verbose output seems to be only partial. I have modified the verbose output recently, so please update to a more recent version of elog. With 2.6.2-3 I get for example
Email from stefan.ritt@psi.ch to stefan.ritt@psi.ch, SMTP host xxx.psi.ch:
220 xxx.psi.ch xxxvs01 Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:25:17 +0200
HELO xxx.psi.ch
250 xxx.psi.ch Hello [129.129.xxx.xxx]
MAIL FROM: stefan.ritt@psi.ch
250 2.1.0 stefan.ritt@psi.ch....Sender OK
RCPT TO: <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
250 2.1.5 stefan.ritt@psi.ch
RCPT TO: <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
250 2.1.5 stefan.ritt@psi.ch
DATA
354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:25:17 +0200
To: "Stefan Ritt" <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
From: Stefan Ritt <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
User-Agent: Elog Version 2.6.2
Subject: Updated ELOG entry
X-Elog-URL: http://localhost:8080/demo/1
X-Elog-submit-type: web|elog
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
... here comes the complete email body ....
.
250 2.6.0 <xxx.psi.ch> Queued mail for delivery
QUIT
221 2.0.0 xxx.psi.ch Service closing transmission channel
==== Return ================================
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Server: ELOG HTTP 2.6.2-1724
Connection: Keep-Alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=60, max=10
Content-Length: 20
This is of course without SMTP username. Our mail server does not support SMTP username, so I programmed this kind of "blindly".
Ibrahim Genc wrote: | Another question is; Can I change the port number of the smtp server? Some servers use another port than 25. |
All server I met so far were running on port 25, so I hardcoded this in elogd.c. You can change it in the source code at line 2119:
bind_addr.sin_port = htons((short) 25);
If more people ask for this, I can make it a parameter. |
1986
|
Thu Oct 12 17:42:37 2006 |
| Ibrahim Genc | ig004@hotmail.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Error Sending Email |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Ibrahim Genc wrote: | I get error message after submitting a message |
Your verbose output seems to be only partial. I have modified the verbose output recently, so please update to a more recent version of elog. With 2.6.2-3 I get for example
|
I downloaded the latest version just yesterday. I checked again now; it is version 2.6.2-3. I'll wait some time for release of new build of windows binaries. Mine differs from yours as a one build number only.
Thanks for prompt answer. |
1987
|
Fri Oct 13 16:59:13 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box |
Gregory M. Caughey wrote: | Hope this helps a little... |
Yepp it helped. I could reproduce your problem and fix it. Can you try elog262-4.exe (Revision 1729)? |
1988
|
Fri Oct 13 23:17:05 2006 |
| Ibrahim Genc | ig004@hotmail.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Error Sending Email |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Ibrahim Genc wrote: | I get error message after submitting a message |
Your verbose output seems to be only partial. I have modified the verbose output recently, so please update to a more recent version of elog. With 2.6.2-3 I get for example
Email from stefan.ritt@psi.ch to stefan.ritt@psi.ch, SMTP host xxx.psi.ch:
...
|
Now I installed 262-4 but no change. communication seems to be stopped at the same point.
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
This is of course without SMTP username. Our mail server does not support SMTP username, so I programmed this kind of "blindly".
|
There is a free e-mail service at mail.softhome.net. It provides smtp and pop3 services. You can use this for testing if you want.
Saluts.
--
ibrahim |
1989
|
Sat Oct 14 10:01:17 2006 |
| Gregory M. Caughey | caugheygm@aol.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Gregory M. Caughey wrote: | Hope this helps a little... |
Yepp it helped. I could reproduce your problem and fix it. Can you try elog262-4.exe (Revision 1729)? |
Hi Stefan!
Just installed elog-2.6.2-1729 and it's working perfectly. I haven't had enough time to test it thoroughly yet but will report any problems I might find. As always thanks for your excellent work, I appreciate it.
Regards, Greg |