Running elog as ordinnary user, posted by G. Vandemoortele on Fri Jan 27 20:40:00 2006
|
Hello,
I've configured elog with some commands running a shell :
|
Re: Running elog as ordinnary user, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jan 27 23:18:07 2006
|
[quote="G. Vandemoortele"]I've configured elog with some commands running a shell :
Preset R-Date = $shell(/usr/bin/date +"%Y/%m/%d %H:%S")
|
|
Re: Running elog as ordinnary user, posted by G. Vandemoortele on Sat Jan 28 10:40:18 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
First of all, you could use
|
Re: Running elog as ordinnary user, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Jan 28 12:54:03 2006 
|
[quote="G. Vandemoortele"]Started via root (# /usr/sbin/elogd -c /home/gv/.elog/elogd.cfg -x), it works,
but via "gv" ($ /usr/sbin/elogd -c /home/gv/.elog/elogd.cfg -x), it doesn't.[/quote]
|
Quicklink does not work for one field, posted by mark james on Mon Oct 24 12:00:51 2005
|
I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work. It is the "Spacecraft" field. When I select any 'Spacecraft' quicklink,
the no. of records stays exactly the same (i.e. no. in full recordset). If I select F1, then I see F1 highlight in yellow in the string "4F1". But strangely
the "F1" entries are not highlight. Very strange.
|
|
Re: Quicklink does not work for one field, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jan 18 12:15:17 2006
|
[quote="mark james"]I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work.[/quote]
Sorry my late reply, but now I have fixed this problem. The update is under SVN and will be contained in the next release. |
|
Re: Quicklink does not work for one field, posted by mark james on Mon Jan 23 17:32:20 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="mark james"]I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work.[/quote]
Sorry my late reply, but now I have fixed this problem. The update is under SVN and will be contained in the next release.[/quote]
|
|
Re: Quicklink does not work for one field, posted by mark james on Mon Jan 23 18:35:52 2006
|
[quote="mark james"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="mark james"]I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work.[/quote]
Sorry my late reply, but now I have fixed this problem. The update is under SVN and will be contained in the next release.[/quote]
|
|
Re: Quicklink does not work for one field, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jan 24 08:11:13 2006
|
[quote="mark james"][quote="mark james"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="mark james"]I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields
just do not work.[/quote]
|
|
Re: Quicklink does not work for one field, posted by mark james on Fri Jan 27 13:50:10 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="mark james"][quote="mark james"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="mark james"]I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of
my Quicklink fields just do not work.[/quote]
|
|
Re: Quicklink does not work for one field, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jan 27 13:52:34 2006
|
[quote="mark james"]OK. But where do I get this from? The "latest version of 19 Jan is still 1622.[/quote]
If you can compile it yourself, you get it from Subversion (see [URL=/afs/pi.infn.it/group/mug/docs/talks/review_feb06/]here[/URL]). Otherwise you have |
Suggestion additional ElCodes, posted by T. Ribbrock on Tue Jan 24 14:43:19 2006
|
I have to say, now that I'm finally on 2.6.x, I grew really fond of the ElCode stuff - great addition! It saves a lot of straight HTML typing for me...
THANKS!
|
|
Re: Suggestion additional ElCodes, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jan 24 22:52:48 2006
|
[quote="T. Ribbrock"]However, there are two things I'm missing:
[LIST]
[*] [I]Headings[/I]
|
|
Re: Suggestion additional ElCodes, posted by T. Ribbrock on Wed Jan 25 12:31:14 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
Yes, I missed tables myself already. The headings I just put into the current SVN version (see this forum for how it works).
[/quote]
|
|
Attachments in duplicated entries, posted by Bertram Metz on Thu Dec 8 10:32:37 2005
|
Hi,
the [B]duplicate[/B] command duplicates the entry text itself, but it does not duplicate attachments.
|
|
Re: Attachments in duplicated entries, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Dec 21 20:54:11 2005
|
[quote="Bertram Metz"]The [B]duplicate[/B] command duplicates the entry text itself, but it does not duplicate attachments. If attachments in a duplicated
entry are deleted, the original attachment files are deleted as well and cannot be accessed anymore within the original entry.
|
Re: Attachments in duplicated entries, posted by Bertram Metz on Tue Jan 24 14:39:21 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Bertram Metz"]The [B]duplicate[/B] command duplicates the entry text itself, but it does not duplicate attachments. If attachments
in a duplicated entry are deleted, the original attachment files are deleted as well and cannot be accessed anymore within the original entry.
|
|
redirect errors via apache2, posted by djek on Mon Jan 23 10:30:51 2006
|
Since elog 2.6.0 we cannot redirect our elog via apache2.
in apache2.conf we have (had for a long time):
|
|
Re: redirect errors via apache2, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jan 23 10:57:45 2006
|
> Since elog 2.6.0 we cannot redirect our elog via apache2.
>
> in apache2.conf we have (had for a long time):
|
|
Re: redirect errors via apache2, posted by djek on Mon Jan 23 11:18:48 2006
|
> > Since elog 2.6.0 we cannot redirect our elog via apache2.
> >
> > in apache2.conf we have (had for a long time):
|
|
Buffer Overflow?, posted by Chris Warner on Wed Jan 18 17:20:45 2006
|
Users can access root level directories by using a modified URL. I saw on some security web sites that this was a problem in previous versions. Was it not
fixed in 2.6?
|
|
Re: Buffer Overflow?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 19 10:31:05 2006
|
[quote="Chris Warner"]Users can access root level directories by using a modified URL. I saw on some security web sites that this was a problem in previous
versions. Was it not fixed in 2.6?
|
Re: Buffer Overflow?, posted by Chris Warner on Fri Jan 20 02:53:40 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Chris Warner"]Users can access root level directories by using a modified URL. I saw on some security web sites that this was
a problem in previous versions. Was it not fixed in 2.6?
|
In version 2.6 the themes do not work right on Windows., posted by Mark Coudriet on Tue Jan 17 16:04:28 2006
|
In version 2.6 the themes do not work right on Windows.
The URL is fixed at whichever logbook that is selected (e.g. ELOG 2.5.9-4 is <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="default.css"> & ELOG 2.6.0-1
is <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://localhost:8080/demo/default.css">). |
|
Re: In version 2.6 the themes do not work right on Windows., posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jan 18 12:57:30 2006
|
[quote]The URL is fixed at whichever logbook that is selected (e.g. ELOG 2.5.9-4 is <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="default.css"> & ELOG 2.6.0-1
is <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://localhost:8080/demo/default.css">).[/quote]
|
Re: In version 2.6 the themes do not work right on Windows., posted by Mark Coudriet on Thu Jan 19 20:50:29 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote]The URL is fixed at whichever logbook that is selected (e.g. ELOG 2.5.9-4 is <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="default.css">
& ELOG 2.6.0-1 is <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://localhost:8080/demo/default.css">).[/quote]
|
|
Re: In version 2.6 the themes do not work right on Windows., posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 19 20:53:01 2006
|
[quote="Mark Coudriet"]But I just updated to your new version 2.6.1 & everything is fine now. Thanks for your help! :D[/quote]
Japp. I switched back to relative links for CSS again, seems to give less trouble. :] |
|
settings for "show only new entries", posted by Ulrich Trüssel on Thu Jan 19 16:59:38 2006
|
how ca i set the date for the "show only new entries" button? maybe i missed somethin on the elog.cfg description?
thank's for hint! :-) |
|
Re: settings for "show only new entries", posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 19 17:05:22 2006
|
[quote="Ulrich Trüssel"]how ca i set the date for the "show only new entries" button? maybe i missed somethin on the elog.cfg description?
thank's for hint! :-)[/quote]
|