Getting back from "Find" mode, posted by Yoshio Imai on Tue Nov 15 10:58:23 2005
|
Hi again!
There is one question regarding the "Find" function of the elog. Clicking onto "Search" takes the user to the list view on only those entries that match |
Re: Getting back from "Find" mode, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Nov 15 12:50:37 2005
|
[quote="Yoshio Imai"]There is one question regarding the "Find" function of the elog. Clicking onto "Search" takes the user to the list view on only those
entries that match the search conditions. Since we use the list view in "Full" mode by default, this usually is enough to give us an overview of the event
we looked for.
|
Re: Getting back from "Find" mode, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jan 11 21:12:13 2006 
|
[quote="Yoshio Imai"]Is there a more direct way to get back to the unfiltered list view than selecting an entry and go to "List" or using "Find" again and
clicking on "Back"?[/quote]
|
|
Date imports from CSV incorrectly, posted by David Brody on Tue Jan 10 00:32:19 2006
|
When I import from a CSV file, dates formatted as mm/dd/yy always get imported as 12/31/1969
Here are the parameters I am using for dates:
|
|
Re: Date imports from CSV incorrectly, posted by David Brody on Tue Jan 10 19:30:09 2006
|
[quote="David Brody"]When I import from a CSV file, dates formatted as mm/dd/yy always get imported as 12/31/1969
Here are the parameters I am using for dates:
|
|
MS Fonts only in ELCode options?, posted by T. Ribbrock on Wed Jan 4 12:05:21 2006
|
I'm just after installing 2.6.0 and marvelling at all the changes, especially ELCode (I was using 2.5.8 previously). However, I noticed that the "FONT"
menu for ELCodes only offers Microsoft fonts 8o - something I usually avoid like hell when publishing web content, as I cannot rely on those being installed
on the clients. As far as I can see there is no easy way to change this, short of patching the source - or is there?
|
|
Re: MS Fonts only in ELCode options?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jan 9 20:53:28 2006
|
[quote="T. Ribbrock"]I'm just after installing 2.6.0 and marvelling at all the changes, especially ELCode (I was using 2.5.8 previously). However, I noticed
that the "FONT" menu for ELCodes only offers Microsoft fonts 8o - something I usually avoid like hell when publishing web content, as I cannot rely on
those being installed on the clients. As far as I can see there is no easy way to change this, short of patching the source - or is there?
|
|
Re: MS Fonts only in ELCode options?, posted by T. Ribbrock on Tue Jan 10 10:42:18 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
In revision 1593 I implemented a "Fonts = ..." option where you can specify a list of fonts to be shown on the list. I tried however the MS set of fonts
on a Linux system, and found that the MS fonts got mapped to Unix fonts in a reasonable way. Even the [FONT=comic sans ms]Comic Sans MS[/FONT] font was |
|
HelpELCode needs to be present in "Menu commands"?, posted by T. Ribbrock on Wed Jan 4 12:26:31 2006
|
Another little issue I came across was this: I'm using "Menu commands" and "Guest Menu commands" in my configuration. When I logged in and started to create
a new entry, clicking on the URL that is behind "ELCode" at the bottom of the screen (and accesses the help for the ELCodes) resulted in a "command denied".
The only way to get around this was to add "HelpELCode" to "Menu commands" - but now it also shows up in the menus, which is not what I want. Is there |
|
Re: HelpELCode needs to be present in "Menu commands"?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jan 9 20:19:32 2006
|
[quote="T. Ribbrock"]Another little issue I came across was this: I'm using "Menu commands" and "Guest Menu commands" in my configuration. When I logged
in and started to create a new entry, clicking on the URL that is behind "ELCode" at the bottom of the screen (and accesses the help for the ELCodes) resulted
in a "command denied". The only way to get around this was to add "HelpELCode" to "Menu commands" - but now it also shows up in the menus, which is not |
"Logkook dir" in top group [global] section ineffective, posted by Yoshio Imai on Thu Nov 24 20:08:00 2005
|
Hi, it's me again!
I have found one possible bug. We have declared top groups for our logbooks; one for administration and one for the shift logbooks. In the [global]-section |
|
Re: "Logkook dir" in top group [global] section ineffective, posted by Yoshio Imai on Fri Nov 25 14:05:08 2005
|
| OK, I found the note about "Logbook dir" in Stephen Wood's entry (http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/1101) ;) |
|
Re: "Logkook dir" in top group [global] section ineffective, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Dec 22 20:50:57 2005
|
[quote="Yoshio Imai"]There are also one question/request (you see that we use the elog extensively now ;)):
When searching for a particular event in our shift log using the "Find" function, it would often be useful not to go to the single entry, but to the page
where that entry resides. This way we can see the whole context of the event. When clicking onto an entry in the "Find" result page, this takes us of course |
|
Re: "Logkook dir" in top group [global] section ineffective, posted by Yoshio Imai on Wed Jan 4 15:27:31 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]I implemented that request. When you click on "list", it takes you to the listing page containing the current entry, which is even
highlighted. Have a look at this forum if this is what you like.[/quote]
|
|
Re: "Logkook dir" in top group [global] section ineffective, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Jan 9 20:09:16 2006
|
[quote="Yoshio Imai"]One strange thing (maybe it isn't strange at all) is the following behaviour: when the list view is set to "summary", then the line
containing the entry where we clicked "list" is highlighted, however when the list view is set to "full", it isn't. Is this "a bug, or a feature"? ;)[/quote]
|
elogd 2.6.0 crash on password Forgot?, posted by Mike on Tue Jan 3 17:20:16 2006
|
I have been having a repeatable crash on V2.6.0 everytime someone tries to recover a password using the option from the login screen. See attachment for
a jpg of the message.
|
|
"Syntax of elogd.cfg" - Document, posted by Edmundo T Rodriguez on Thu Dec 22 21:15:19 2005
|
The document "ELOG - Syntax of elogd.cfg" is outdated!
Are we going to have an updated documented?
|
|
Re: "Syntax of elogd.cfg" - Document, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Dec 23 09:07:14 2005
|
[quote="Edmundo T Rodriguez"]The document "ELOG - Syntax of elogd.cfg" is outdated![/quote]
I forgot to update the web server, but the document distributed in the 2.6.0 package was up to date.
|
|
Maximum number of LogBooks? Bug?, posted by Mike on Thu Dec 22 14:32:00 2005
|
Is there a Maximum number logbooks?
I have run into a problem but I'm not sure if to call it a Bug or not. We have started using Elog to keep a work log for each of our production servers. |
|
Re: Maximum number of LogBooks? Bug?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Dec 22 15:14:39 2005
|
[quote="Mike"]Is there a Maximum number logbooks?
I have run into a problem but I'm not sure if to call it a Bug or not. We have started using Elog to keep a work log for each of our production servers. |
Re: Maximum number of LogBooks? Bug?, posted by Mike on Thu Dec 22 15:39:23 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"]
You're really pushing to the limit ;)
|