ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
68252
|
Mon Feb 8 13:52:33 2016 |
| Tapasi Ghosh | tapasi03@gmail.com | Question | Mac OSX | elog-3.1.0 | New entry cannot be written to directory "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo/" | Dear All,
I could not submit a new enetry to my logbook whenever restarting my laptop. I am a new user to elog.
Attached is the screenshot of the error message and also there is "nobody" while I grep elog.
----------------------
>>
Tapasis-MacBook-Pro-2:elog-3.1.0 tapasi$ ps aux | grep elog
tapasi 560 0.4 0.0 2432772 644 s002 S+ 9:50AM 0:00.01 grep elog
nobody 76 0.0 0.4 2481308 18440 ?? Ss 9:48AM 0:00.08 /usr/local/sbin/elogd -c /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
--------------------------
Any suggesstion will be very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Tapasi
|
68251
|
Thu Feb 4 15:07:07 2016 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Windows | V3.1.1-0767eb0 | Re: Applying cell style or some sort of subst in list view only | > Good day,
>
> I have an attribute that is 25 chars. it can be empty until someone edit it to fill the information.
> The default view for that logbook is List.
>
> Is it possible to display that attribute in list view but not the entire 25 chars ?
> What I mean is that if the field is empty, show it as empty but if it has some information, show something like "X" in List view.
>
> I tried playing with Styles and Cell Styles but I couldn't figure it out...
> Cell Style seams to require specific values "" to apply the style properties. I can't figure how to apply cell style "if field is not empty" :)
>
> Thanks for your help :)
If your server would run on Linux, then the configuration below would just do what you've asked for:
Attributes = X
List change X = $shell(if [ -z "$X" ] ;then echo "";else echo "X";fi)
But since shell scripting is operating system dependent, you'll need to figure out yourself how to do it in Windows.
Cheers
Andreas |
68250
|
Thu Feb 4 14:47:50 2016 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | V3.1.1-0767eb0 | Re: Applying cell style or some sort of subst in list view only | > Good day,
>
> I have an attribute that is 25 chars. it can be empty until someone edit it to fill the information.
> The default view for that logbook is List.
>
> Is it possible to display that attribute in list view but not the entire 25 chars ?
> What I mean is that if the field is empty, show it as empty but if it has some information, show something like "X" in List view.
>
> I tried playing with Styles and Cell Styles but I couldn't figure it out...
> Cell Style seams to require specific values "" to apply the style properties. I can't figure how to apply cell style "if field is not empty" :)
>
> Thanks for your help :)
Unfortunately something like this is not implemented in elog.
Stefan |
68249
|
Thu Feb 4 14:21:19 2016 |
| Francois Cloutier | Francois@fcmail.ca | Question | Windows | V3.1.1-0767eb0 | Applying cell style or some sort of subst in list view only | Good day,
I have an attribute that is 25 chars. it can be empty until someone edit it to fill the information.
The default view for that logbook is List.
Is it possible to display that attribute in list view but not the entire 25 chars ?
What I mean is that if the field is empty, show it as empty but if it has some information, show something like "X" in List view.
I tried playing with Styles and Cell Styles but I couldn't figure it out...
Cell Style seams to require specific values "" to apply the style properties. I can't figure how to apply cell style "if field is not empty" :)
Thanks for your help :) |
68248
|
Fri Jan 29 06:35:05 2016 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Windows | Latest | Re: Can I host elog in the web under windows platform without Apache Web Server? | Can't help you with that, and I think it is the wrong forum to ask that question.
You'll need a web service provider that will allow you to run your own services.
And then it'll either require some skills in host administration or a full host service by the provider.
Cheers, Andreas
Dawang wrote: |
Thanks Andreas and Stefan,
Since I'm not good in setting up webserver, do you know a web hosting company that can I use to integrate elog so that i can access my elog publicly same as you are using here? Thanks.
BR,
Raymund
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
I admit that I'm not sure if I understood the question. It is quite some work to do the opposite, to run elog behind an Apache Web Server.
But if you just install ELOG out of the box it will always run without an Apache Web Server. You don't need to add anything in the config file for that.
Dawang wrote: |
Hi All,
Can I host elog in the web (internet) under windows platform (elogd.exe only) without Apache Web Server? If possible, what syntax should I add in the configuration file? Appreciate feedback. Thanks.
Cheers,
Raymund
|
|
|
|
68247
|
Fri Jan 29 05:38:03 2016 |
| Dawang | raymund.dawang@gmail.com | Question | Windows | Latest | Re: Can I host elog in the web under windows platform without Apache Web Server? | Thanks Andreas and Stefan,
Since I'm not good in setting up webserver, do you know a web hosting company that can I use to integrate elog so that i can access my elog publicly same as you are using here? Thanks.
BR,
Raymund
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
I admit that I'm not sure if I understood the question. It is quite some work to do the opposite, to run elog behind an Apache Web Server.
But if you just install ELOG out of the box it will always run without an Apache Web Server. You don't need to add anything in the config file for that.
Dawang wrote: |
Hi All,
Can I host elog in the web (internet) under windows platform (elogd.exe only) without Apache Web Server? If possible, what syntax should I add in the configuration file? Appreciate feedback. Thanks.
Cheers,
Raymund
|
|
|
68246
|
Thu Jan 28 20:02:06 2016 |
| Devin Bougie | devin.bougie@cornell.edu | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: attachments created using "Image" button can not be clicked-on and do not appear in the attachment table. | As there appears to be some inconsistencies, I thought I'd document the behaviour of each of the attachment options.
------
1. Click on the "Image" button in the CKEditor, click on "Choose File" and browse to the file, click on "Send it to the Server", and click "OK".
- The image appears inline at the configured "Thumbnail size", but it is not clickable and it does not appear in the attachment table when viewing the entry.
2. Drag and drop an image into the body of the message.
- The image appears inline at the configured "Thumbnail size" and is clickable. As with "1," however, it does not appear in the attachment table when viewing the entry.
3. Drag and drop an image into the "Drop attachments here ..." section.
- The image appears in the attachment table at the configured Thumbnail Size, and is clickable.
4. From the attachment table, click on "Choose File" and then click on "Upload."
- The image appears in the attachment table at the configured Thumbnail Size, and is clickable.
------
We need to make sure the images are always clickable so that you can always view the full-sized image. Any suggestions for fixing this, short of reverting to v2.9.2, would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks again,
Devin
Devin Bougie wrote: |
This has been confirmed usign the Demo forum on this server. For example, please see https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Linux+Demo/8
When an image is attached using the "Image" button in the CKEditor, that image does not appear in the attachment table for that entry. In addition, the image can not be clicked on to view the full image.
This was not the case in v2.9.2, at least.
Is there some configuration option I could toggle to change this behaviour? By default, we would like any attachment (whether it's made using drag and drop, the Image button, or the "Choose File" button) to appear in the attachment table *and* be clickable to view the full image.
Thanks,
Devin
|
|
68245
|
Wed Jan 27 21:33:53 2016 |
| Devin Bougie | devin.bougie@cornell.edu | Bug report | Linux | 3.1.1 | attachments created using "Image" button can not be clicked-on and do not appear in the attachment table. | This has been confirmed usign the Demo forum on this server. For example, please see https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Linux+Demo/8
When an image is attached using the "Image" button in the CKEditor, that image does not appear in the attachment table for that entry. In addition, the image can not be clicked on to view the full image.
This was not the case in v2.9.2, at least.
Is there some configuration option I could toggle to change this behaviour? By default, we would like any attachment (whether it's made using drag and drop, the Image button, or the "Choose File" button) to appear in the attachment table *and* be clickable to view the full image.
Thanks,
Devin |
|