ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
1733
|
Tue Feb 28 12:08:42 2006 |
| Alex H | alex@synergie-inf.com | Info | Windows | 2.6.1-1668 | [SOLVED] Re: MOptions problem ? |
Yop,
I think I found the solution! I was in fact a conditions conflict!
See the attached picture for easiest comprehension.
My list box type's conditions (FWL1{1}, FWL2{2}, FWL4{3}, VPN1{4}, VPN2{5}, CLIVPN-PROC{6}) conflict with my Equipment's conditions. It seems that the condition ID must be unique across the whole elogd.cfg.
So I have replaced my "Options Type = FWL1{1}, FWL2{2}, FWL4{3}, VPN1{4}, VPN2{5}, CLIVPN-PROC{6}"
by : "Options Type = FWL1{101}, FWL2{102}, FWL4{103}, VPN1{104}, VPN2{105}, CLIVPN-PROC"
and it works well ! |
Attachment 1: gotcha.gif
|
|
1734
|
Wed Mar 1 07:48:11 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | Windows | 2.6.1-1668 | [SOLVED] Re: MOptions problem ? |
Alex H wrote: | It seems that the condition ID must be unique across the whole elogd.cfg. |
Right. Here is a quote from the Manual:
ELOG Manual wrote: | The only requiremnt is that conditions are unique, meaning that a condition in one option list cannot be used in another list. |
So just read the manual |
1735
|
Wed Mar 1 07:55:42 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.1-1653 | Re: list view mode remembert - Bug? |
> As default http://<hostname>/<LOGBOOK> shows the Summary View.
> Clicking in "Full" changes the URL to http://<hostname>/<LOGBOOK>/?mode=full.
> But now the URL http://<hostname>/<LOGBOOK> show the Full view as default.
> I think the URL without ?mode=... should show every time the same result,
> regardless the view used before. Or maybe I can configure, which view I want to
> see if I use the URL w/o ?mode=... The option to hide/show attachments is affected too.
Sure, that's a feature :D
It was requested by several people that the view mode is stored in a cookie. So if you switch modes, it should be
persistent. If I now add additional default flags, people will have hard time to understand what this is all
about, since there might then be conflicting settings between the flags and the cookies. So for what exact purpose
do you want what you requested? Why does it bother you that you have to click "Summary" again to get the summary
view? Of course you can delete the local cookies and get the default behaviour (they are named [b]elmode[/b] and
[b]elattach[/b]), but that might be a bit cumbersome. |
1736
|
Wed Mar 1 10:30:51 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Windows | V2.6.1-165 | Re: How to setup Change attributes in detail view/edit mode ? |
I implemented a "Hide attributes = ..." option, with which you can do what you requested, but unfortunately I'm
sitting here in Siberia and have only limited internet access, so I can only submit the modification next weekend.
- Stefan |
1737
|
Wed Mar 1 10:31:33 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.5.9 | Re: eLog Version number as eLog attribute? |
Steve Jones wrote: | When a footer is used (via Bottom text = <filename>) eLog no longer displays the eLog version number at the bottom. Is it possible to somehow expose the version/revision as an eLog attribute or have the version still display even when a replacement footer is specified?
Thanks! |
I added that feature, but will not be able to commit it before the next weekend. |
1738
|
Wed Mar 1 12:27:36 2006 |
| Holger Mundhahs | holger.mundhahs@vtg-rail.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.1-1653 | [SOLVED] Re: list view mode remembert - Bug? |
> > As default http://<hostname>/<LOGBOOK> shows the Summary View.
> > Clicking in "Full" changes the URL to http://<hostname>/<LOGBOOK>/?mode=full.
> > But now the URL http://<hostname>/<LOGBOOK> show the Full view as default.
> > I think the URL without ?mode=... should show every time the same result,
> > regardless the view used before. Or maybe I can configure, which view I want to
> > see if I use the URL w/o ?mode=... The option to hide/show attachments is affected too.
>
> Sure, that's a feature :D
>
> It was requested by several people that the view mode is stored in a cookie. So if you switch modes, it should be
> persistent. If I now add additional default flags, people will have hard time to understand what this is all
> about, since there might then be conflicting settings between the flags and the cookies. So for what exact purpose
> do you want what you requested? Why does it bother you that you have to click "Summary" again to get the summary
> view? Of course you can delete the local cookies and get the default behaviour (they are named [b]elmode[/b] and
> [b]elattach[/b]), but that might be a bit cumbersome.
Thank you for your explanation. My situation was, that I've played around with "Mode commands = 0". In normal case I
use the Summary view, but on one logbook I've changed it to Full before, and after setting the parameter I can't
revert it to Summary. But now I know how it works and can use it like intended.
Regards
Holger |
1739
|
Wed Mar 1 19:51:05 2006 |
| Alexandre Gauthier | supernaut@underwares.org | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.1-1622 | Inline images URL not working |
Hello
I'm running elog on the blackdog embedded device so I can carry it around while doing my consultant work.
Whenever I try to insert an inline picture by using the elog: /1 paths with ELCode, the link becomes "logbookname2/1" (Where logbookname is the name of my logbook) and hence, doesn't work. I recall that it worked once. The image did not display, but the URL seemed correct...
Any ideas?
EDIT: i inserted a space in the elog URL above because regardless of the code brackets, it would still get interpreted. |
1740
|
Wed Mar 1 20:22:28 2006 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Question | All | 2.5.9 | Re: eLog Version number as eLog attribute? |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Steve Jones wrote: | When a footer is used (via Bottom text = <filename>) eLog no longer displays the eLog version number at the bottom. Is it possible to somehow expose the version/revision as an eLog attribute or have the version still display even when a replacement footer is specified?
Thanks! |
I added that feature, but will not be able to commit it before the next weekend. |
Quote: | Not a problem! Thanks |
|