ELOG Forum

Demo Discussion

Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities

Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 248 of 805

Not logged in

Find | Login | Help

Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments

6440 Entries

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 247, 248, 249 ... 803, 804, 805 Next

Fri Feb 20 11:04:03 2015

maximum attributes for drop down menu.

We use a servername field to be able to select a server.

When i entered my entire serverlist (574 entries), only 250 of them show up.

Looking at the online documentation about attributes, it is stated that there is a maximum of 100 entries.

With the version we are using (2.7.1) it seems the limit is 250

Can someone tell me if version 3 has the same limitation, or that the max has been increased?

Rob.

67810

Wed Feb 18 04:57:32 2015

Elog stability with multiple users

Are there any known or reported daemon stability issues with an increase of concurrent users logged in to view and search entries, while the elog client is also adding 5 to 10 new entries every minute during a peak 2-hour period each day?

67809

Fri Feb 13 21:18:46 2015

Re: Fail to install in mac

Point your browser to http://localhost:8080 as written in the documentation

Alex wrote:

Thanks! now install works fine - but I cannot find how to open and start writing- I do

/usr/local/sbin/elogd
elogd 3.0.0 built Feb 13 2015, 16:42:32 revision 21dc563
CKeditor detected
ImageMagick detected
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...

but nothing pops up...I mean it is not possible to run "offline" ie locally on my mac ?

67808

Fri Feb 13 20:36:59 2015

Re: Fail to install in mac

Thanks! now install works fine - but I cannot find how to open and start writing- I do

/usr/local/sbin/elogd
elogd 3.0.0 built Feb 13 2015, 16:42:32 revision 21dc563
CKeditor detected
ImageMagick detected
Indexing logbooks ... done
Server listening on port 8080 ...

but nothing pops up...I mean it is not possible to run "offline" ie locally on my mac ?

67807

Fri Feb 13 19:47:43 2015

Re: Fail to install in mac

Sorry I forgot to include the elogd.plist file in the distribution. I attached it to this entry, so just copy it into the elog root directory and run again "make install".

/Stefan

Alex wrote:

I am trying to install to mac 10.10.2 - everything works almost fine, but when I issue the sudo make install I get

Installing example logbook to /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo
install: logbooks/demo/2001/011108a.log -> /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo/2001/011108a.log
install: elogd.plist: No such file or directory
make: *** [install] Error 71

Any idea why ?

Thanks

Alex

Attachment 1: elogd.plist

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
<plist version="1.0">
<dict>
	<key>Label</key>
	<string>ch.psi.elogd</string>
	<key>ProgramArguments</key>
	<array>
		<string>/usr/local/sbin/elogd</string>
		<string>-c</string>
		<string>/usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg</string>
	</array>
	<key>RunAtLoad</key>
	<true/>
</dict>
</plist>

67806

Fri Feb 13 16:43:00 2015

Fail to install in mac

I am trying to install to mac 10.10.2 - everything works almost fine, but when I issue the sudo make install I get

Any idea why ?

Thanks

Alex

67805

Wed Feb 4 13:32:21 2015

Re: Link to full resolution image attachments

I put the functionality you requested into the current GIT version of ELOG. It works now with Drag & Drop, but not (yet) with the toolbar uploader.

Eric Quintero wrote:

You make a valid point!

My perspective is from my lab's specific use case, in which we often post plots of data in the body of the text, and it is useful for the ELOG-generated thumbnails to link to the full resolution plot. In previous versions, I believe this was the behavior. It would be convenient for my users if this continued to be the case, but I understand that it is not neccesarily the appropriate default behavior for all users of ELOG.

Andreas Luedeke wrote:

If you add the picture in the HTML editor, then you can add any link you like.

I don't see why the specific link to the full resolution picture should be the default.

If you want to have it, why not just add it by hand?

I took the liberty to edit your Linux Demo post accordingly.

For attachments that is a completely different story, since you cannot add any links there, only ELOG can do this for you

67804

Wed Feb 4 13:06:52 2015