Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 260 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectdown Text Attachments
  1144   Mon May 9 21:17:29 2005 Agree Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?> Ok, now I see the issue - the tar extract
created the mxml directory in the root (not
> under the created directory elog-2.5.9).
  
  1145   Mon May 9 21:22:46 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?[ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
elog-2.5.9/
elog-2.5.9/doc/
  
  1146   Mon May 9 23:30:11 2005 Agree Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?> [ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
> elog-2.5.9/
> elog-2.5.9/doc/
  
  68098   Thu Aug 20 14:23:43 2015 Reply Edmund Hertleedmund.hertle@kit.eduInfoAll3.1.1Re: Version 3.1.1 of elog has been releasedThere seems to be a small problem with
the new "Date/Time format <attribute>"
implementation. It works great for the detailed
  
  68099   Thu Aug 20 15:52:26 2015 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chInfoAll3.1.1Re: Version 3.1.1 of elog has been releasedThanks for reportung that bug. I fixed
it in revision f828049.

  
  400   Wed Jul 16 21:42:54 2003 Idea nickc1nick@nick.comInfo 2.3.9Re: Version 2.3.9 released todayCan you give a syntax example of the Logging
Level option ?
  
  402   Thu Jul 17 10:46:29 2003 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chInfo 2.3.9Re: Version 2.3.9 released today> Can you give a syntax example of the Logging
Level option ?
  
  403   Thu Jul 17 18:06:17 2003 Reply nickc1nick@nick.comInfo 2.3.9Re: Version 2.3.9 released todayCheers

It appears Im having problems getting this
  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6