Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 21:17:29 2005
|
> Ok, now I see the issue - the tar extract created the mxml directory in the root (not
> under the created directory elog-2.5.9). Is there a reason why these includes are not
> placed in the src dir like the regex.h/.c include?
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 21:22:46 2005
|
[ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
elog-2.5.9/
elog-2.5.9/doc/
|
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 23:30:11 2005
|
> [ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
> elog-2.5.9/
> elog-2.5.9/doc/
|
|
Re: Version 3.1.1 of elog has been released, posted by Edmund Hertle on Thu Aug 20 14:23:43 2015
|
There seems to be a small problem with the new "Date/Time format <attribute>" implementation. It works great for the detailed view of
a single entry:
|
|
Re: Version 3.1.1 of elog has been released, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Aug 20 15:52:26 2015
|
Thanks for reportung that bug. I fixed it in revision f828049.
Edmund
Hertle wrote:
There seems to be a small problem with the new "Date/Time format |
Re: Version 2.3.9 released today, posted by nickc1 on Wed Jul 16 21:42:54 2003
|
Can you give a syntax example of the Logging Level option ?
|
|
Re: Version 2.3.9 released today, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jul 17 10:46:29 2003
|
> Can you give a syntax example of the Logging Level option ?
Please refer to the documentation (http://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html), I just
|
|
Re: Version 2.3.9 released today, posted by nickc1 on Thu Jul 17 18:06:17 2003
|
Cheers
It appears Im having problems getting this to work, my config is as follows, yet
|