Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 260 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectdown Text Attachments
  1144   Mon May 9 21:17:29 2005 Agree Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?> Ok, now I see the issue - the tar extract
created the mxml directory in the root (not
> under the created directory elog-2.5.9).
  
  1145   Mon May 9 21:22:46 2005 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?[ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
elog-2.5.9/
elog-2.5.9/doc/
  
  1146   Mon May 9 23:30:11 2005 Agree Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionLinux | Other2.5.9Re: Version of GCC to use?> [ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
> elog-2.5.9/
> elog-2.5.9/doc/
  
  68098   Thu Aug 20 14:23:43 2015 Reply Edmund Hertleedmund.hertle@kit.eduInfoAll3.1.1Re: Version 3.1.1 of elog has been releasedThere seems to be a small problem with
the new "Date/Time format <attribute>"
implementation. It works great for the detailed
  
  68099   Thu Aug 20 15:52:26 2015 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chInfoAll3.1.1Re: Version 3.1.1 of elog has been releasedThanks for reportung that bug. I fixed
it in revision f828049.

  
  400   Wed Jul 16 21:42:54 2003 Idea nickc1nick@nick.comInfo 2.3.9Re: Version 2.3.9 released todayCan you give a syntax example of the Logging
Level option ?
  
  402   Thu Jul 17 10:46:29 2003 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chInfo 2.3.9Re: Version 2.3.9 released today> Can you give a syntax example of the Logging
Level option ?
  
  403   Thu Jul 17 18:06:17 2003 Reply nickc1nick@nick.comInfo 2.3.9Re: Version 2.3.9 released todayCheers

It appears Im having problems getting this
  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6