Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 265 of 805  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  67684   Sat Mar 29 13:14:44 2014 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukBug reportLinux2.9.2-a738Re: Defunct daemons
Further work suggests that the type of pdf file might matter, as I have now seen the defunct daemon after
adding the first pdf file in an entry.

However, I have also found that image manipulation (rotation, size) generates a defunct daemon.

> Hi Stefan and Andreas
> 
> Yesterday I reported I had some issues with the latest elog: but now I can reproduce one.  
> elog 2.9.2-a738232
> 
> I started a new entry, and attached three pdf files.  I did not get the problem of not seeing the png thumnbnail
> this time, although that is annoying if you want/need to adjust the thumbnail image before submitting.
> 
> However, if I then look at the running processes, I have the following listed (ps -A)
> 
> 23677 tty1     00:00:04 elogd
> 23809 tty1     00:00:00 elogd <defunct>
> 23825 tty1     00:00:00 elogd <defunct>
> 23847 pts/0    00:00:00 ps
> 
> 23677 was when I started the elogd daemon, having killed off the previous daemon etc for test purposes.
> 
> 23809 and 23825 appeared after a couple of pdfs were added (second and third ones to be precise).  They can only
> be killed off by killing off the original running daemon.  It appears that attaching a second and further pdf
> attachments to any entry generates an elogd <defunct> in the processes list, although attaching a jpg in the
> middle of a list of pdfs didn't (but the next pdf did).  This is happening while adding attachments, that is the
> Submit button has yet to be pressed, so it seems to be generated  when the pdf file is being processed for some
> reason.
> 
> You can end up with quite a stack of these in the process list!
> 
> I never saw this behaviour with the previous version I was running, SVN2475 I think.
> 
> 
> By the way, I still cannot send an attachment over to this server (showing a screenshot) without the 502 error.
  67683   Sat Mar 29 12:14:11 2014 Warning David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukBug reportLinux2.9.2-a738Defunct daemons
Hi Stefan and Andreas

Yesterday I reported I had some issues with the latest elog: but now I can reproduce one.  
elog 2.9.2-a738232

I started a new entry, and attached three pdf files.  I did not get the problem of not seeing the png thumnbnail
this time, although that is annoying if you want/need to adjust the thumbnail image before submitting.

However, if I then look at the running processes, I have the following listed (ps -A)

23677 tty1     00:00:04 elogd
23809 tty1     00:00:00 elogd <defunct>
23825 tty1     00:00:00 elogd <defunct>
23847 pts/0    00:00:00 ps

23677 was when I started the elogd daemon, having killed off the previous daemon etc for test purposes.

23809 and 23825 appeared after a couple of pdfs were added (second and third ones to be precise).  They can only
be killed off by killing off the original running daemon.  It appears that attaching a second and further pdf
attachments to any entry generates an elogd <defunct> in the processes list, although attaching a jpg in the
middle of a list of pdfs didn't (but the next pdf did).  This is happening while adding attachments, that is the
Submit button has yet to be pressed, so it seems to be generated  when the pdf file is being processed for some
reason.

You can end up with quite a stack of these in the process list!

I never saw this behaviour with the previous version I was running, SVN2475 I think.


By the way, I still cannot send an attachment over to this server (showing a screenshot) without the 502 error.
  67682   Fri Mar 28 14:55:16 2014 Reply David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukInfoLinux2.9.2-a738Re: A couple of observations
I tried to attach a screenshot showing this, but kept getting a 502 bad gateway error.
The message in the red banner is
Error sending Email via <i>"psquad.psi.ch"</i>
with that html showing, by the way.
> Hi Stefan and Andreas,
> 
> When I submitted the previous entry, I had an error message about not able to send via psxxxx.psi.ch come up as
> a red bar at the top of the elog page - sorry, cannot remember the subdomain name correctly.
> 
> The observations I was going to make is firstly the change in layout of the Find section - maybe I'll get used
> to it but the change in layout wasn't warmly welcomed.
> 
> Also, shame that moving from Subversion means that the increments are no longer in easy numerical order.  So I
> believe that I am commenting on the latest possible version available, a738232.
> 
> A question.  My logbooks directory is now 1.8GB.  Yes, there are a lot of attachments etc to bulk it out, but
> it's all plain text comments.  Is there a limit as to the size, or total number of entries?  Elog takes a
> notible amount of time to index it all these days, and I have wondered whether a couple of "instabilities" might
> be caused by this.  Anyone any thoughts?
> 
> I don't know how I managed it, but I got elog to generate two entries with the identical ID no.  The new entries
> were different as well.  The log file faithfully had recorded the two separate replies to the entry having the
> same ID no as well.   Unfortunately I went and corrected it by editing the YYMMDDa.log file without keeping a
> copy.  I have also had a mysterious entry ID0 appear in threaded display, despite there being no entry 0; and if
> it appears, it appears in two or three places within the list of threaded entries.
  67681   Fri Mar 28 14:29:24 2014 Entry David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukInfoLinux2.9.2-a738A couple of observations
Hi Stefan and Andreas,

When I submitted the previous entry, I had an error message about not able to send via psxxxx.psi.ch come up as
a red bar at the top of the elog page - sorry, cannot remember the subdomain name correctly.

The observations I was going to make is firstly the change in layout of the Find section - maybe I'll get used
to it but the change in layout wasn't warmly welcomed.

Also, shame that moving from Subversion means that the increments are no longer in easy numerical order.  So I
believe that I am commenting on the latest possible version available, a738232.

A question.  My logbooks directory is now 1.8GB.  Yes, there are a lot of attachments etc to bulk it out, but
it's all plain text comments.  Is there a limit as to the size, or total number of entries?  Elog takes a
notible amount of time to index it all these days, and I have wondered whether a couple of "instabilities" might
be caused by this.  Anyone any thoughts?

I don't know how I managed it, but I got elog to generate two entries with the identical ID no.  The new entries
were different as well.  The log file faithfully had recorded the two separate replies to the entry having the
same ID no as well.   Unfortunately I went and corrected it by editing the YYMMDDa.log file without keeping a
copy.  I have also had a mysterious entry ID0 appear in threaded display, despite there being no entry 0; and if
it appears, it appears in two or three places within the list of threaded entries.
  67680   Fri Mar 28 14:15:18 2014 Question David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukCommentLinux2.9.2-a738Generation of .png files for attachments
Hi Stefan and Andreas,

With the latest incremental version of elog (a738232), I have noticed that when attaching a pdf file, the
.png thumbnail is not generated when the "upload" button is pressed - there is just the usual small line saying
what the latest attachment is.  If this happens, a subsequent attachment will force the generation of the
thumbnail for the *previous* attachment, and again no thumbnail for the latest attachment.

Submitting the comment will also generate the thumbnail.

As of yet, I cannot find any consistent pattern to this.  Also, it's hardly a disaster, but I have been fooled
when attaching a pdf file that subsequently turned out to be damaged and thus unreadable.
  67679   Thu Mar 13 12:39:41 2014 Cool Markus Grosse-KockM.Grosse-Kock@reken.deQuestionWindowsV2.9.2Re: Problem with ELOG

Markus Grosse-Kock wrote:

Hi,

we have a problem. After windows updates, the elog service doesn´t start:

 

What can we do?

Best regards,

Markus

After I uninstalled the software and reinstalled, the function is working again.

Thanks.

Best regards,

Markus

  67678   Thu Mar 13 11:34:58 2014 Warning Markus Grosse-KockM.Grosse-Kock@reken.deQuestionWindowsV2.9.2Problem with ELOG

Hi,

we have a problem. After windows updates, the elog service doesn´t start:

 

What can we do?

Best regards,

Markus

  67677   Tue Mar 11 15:17:36 2014 Reply Donalddon.drummel@gmail.comQuestionWindows2.9.2-2475Re: XML import Error

Donald wrote:

Andreas Luedeke wrote:

Donald wrote:

Hi

 

I've written a powershell script parse a html table that contains old log book data that i would like to import to a elog book.  I've attached a example of the output.

When i attempt a import i get this error

"XML file does not contain <ENCODING> element"

The file does contain an encoding for utf-8  I've tried converting the xml to ANSI and ISO-8859-1 encodings but i get the same error.

is there something obvious that I'm missing?

here is the config of the log book:

 

[WLTST]
Theme = default
Comment = Test Logbook
Attributes = Author, Object, Action
Comment Author = Username
Comment Action = What
Comment Text = Why
Required Attributes = Author, Object, Action, Text
Page Title = Test Logbook
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date, Type

Hi Donald,
yes, the import function gave me some headache in the past, too.
 
English (auto-detected) » English
 
Here it appears that <ENCODING> </ENCODING> became somehow mandatory. But it has a different meaning then what you expect: it is the type of code in the text field, one out of HTML, ELCode or plain.
(Stefan: is this needed to be mandatory? Couldn't you just have some default ?)
In your case: you can just add the XML code "<ENCODING> </ENCODING>" before the <TEXT> token.
My problems were always related to the date format: elogd is very restrictive about what date format it is accepting. that will be your next pproblem ;-)

I hope this helps.

 Hi Andreas

That worked,  thank you so much. now I'm on to a new error. 

Now every time i try to do the import it crashed the elogd. 

OS is windows server 2008 R2.  I have the elogd installed as a service.

here is the even log:

Faulting application name: elogd.exe, version: 0.0.0.0, time stamp: 0x51248707
Faulting module name: elogd.exe, version: 0.0.0.0, time stamp: 0x51248707
Exception code: 0xc0000417
Fault offset: 0x000682da
Faulting process id: 0x558
Faulting application start time: 0x01cf37d8870fc9a1
Faulting application path: D:\Program Files (x86)\ELOG\elogd.exe
Faulting module path: D:\Program Files (x86)\ELOG\elogd.exe
Report Id: defc3f39-a3cb-11e3-9dd5-005056954c86

I have attached the Data file I'm using to generate the fault every time.  same config as before.   Any Ideas?

 

 Anyone have any luck reproducing the error? or have suggestions on how to fix it?

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6