ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
67630
|
Wed Nov 27 15:22:37 2013 |
| Stephen | swgallman@bpa.gov | Bug report | Windows | 2.9.2 | Re: Crash report involving propagate and replies |
David Pilgram wrote: |
Stephen wrote: |
Using Elog 2.9.2
Elog crashes when making 10 replies, I narrowed the crash down to the Propagate Attributes setting.
I have an attribute "Status" that can be toggled between "Open" and "Closed" and that propagates all replies. On the 10th reply the application crashed, this is repeatable 100% of the time. Without the propagate option everything works fine.
Attached is my config file parsed down.
Is there a way around this, or is there a way on reply to change the attribute of the log note you replied to from open to closed without using the propagate option?
|
Hi Stephen,
I see that you don't allow branching in your threads. Why do you need to propagate the Status throughtout the thread? Why not just mark the latest entry and (incase it is necessary) 'collapse to last = 1'
I'm not saying that the bug (if bug it is, rather than a preset limitation) you've found should not be fixed, but I'm puzzled as to why you happen to use the feature. I can see the point if an initial entry provides a whole tree of branches (and a limit of 10 is rather limiting). OK, I know if it is historic, it cannot easily be changed because of other users. Or if some users will primarily be responding to emails rather viewing the logbook via a browser. I'm a single (ab)user elog system myself, so I'm very tolerant of changing how elog works if it offers an improvement.
|
Thank you for the reply, the not allowing branching was added during the troubleshooting phase of the crashing. Initially I thought the branches caused the issue because crashing only occured on log notes that branched as I only saw the crash on notes that branched, this proved not to be the case. Even with branches the system will crash once there are 10 replies in the note with propagate on.
As for use case, with a few users I needed a way to represent a note as open so that the next person knew work still needed to be done. Once work was completed all notes close, the reason for not using edit is so I have a clear record of what happened (although I may need to change to edit if 10 is the max). I will experiment with the collapse to last to see how it looks. Any other suggestions would be helpful. |
67629
|
Tue Nov 26 21:49:42 2013 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Bug report | Windows | 2.9.2 | Re: Crash report involving propagate and replies |
Stephen wrote: |
Using Elog 2.9.2
Elog crashes when making 10 replies, I narrowed the crash down to the Propagate Attributes setting.
I have an attribute "Status" that can be toggled between "Open" and "Closed" and that propagates all replies. On the 10th reply the application crashed, this is repeatable 100% of the time. Without the propagate option everything works fine.
Attached is my config file parsed down.
Is there a way around this, or is there a way on reply to change the attribute of the log note you replied to from open to closed without using the propagate option?
|
Hi Stephen,
I see that you don't allow branching in your threads. Why do you need to propagate the Status throughtout the thread? Why not just mark the latest entry and (incase it is necessary) 'collapse to last = 1'
I'm not saying that the bug (if bug it is, rather than a preset limitation) you've found should not be fixed, but I'm puzzled as to why you happen to use the feature. I can see the point if an initial entry provides a whole tree of branches (and a limit of 10 is rather limiting). OK, I know if it is historic, it cannot easily be changed because of other users. Or if some users will primarily be responding to emails rather viewing the logbook via a browser. I'm a single (ab)user elog system myself, so I'm very tolerant of changing how elog works if it offers an improvement. |
67628
|
Tue Nov 26 16:24:39 2013 |
| Stephen | swgallman@bpa.gov | Bug report | Windows | 2.9.2 | Crash report involving propagate and replies | Using Elog 2.9.2
Elog crashes when making 10 replies, I narrowed the crash down to the Propagate Attributes setting.
I have an attribute "Status" that can be toggled between "Open" and "Closed" and that propagates all replies. On the 10th reply the application crashed, this is repeatable 100% of the time. Without the propagate option everything works fine.
Attached is my config file parsed down.
Is there a way around this, or is there a way on reply to change the attribute of the log note you replied to from open to closed without using the propagate option? |
67627
|
Tue Nov 26 11:28:39 2013 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Linux | 2.9.2-2455 | Re: Problem with space in name of eLog not seeing %20 and "+" |
David Pilgram wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Tom C wrote: |
My elog is named "Whatever Elog" so the URL generated is /Whatever+Elog . This works fine but when in the interface certain buttons generate this URL : /Whatever%20Elog ...this URL fails. It seems that elog does not recognize these ( + and %20 ) as the same which I believe they should be as part of HTTP request.
|
Can you be a bit more specific which buttons you mean? The demo logbook https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Linux+Demo/ has also a space and I cannot see any problem there.
|
Years ago I had a similar issue, although I cannot remember the exact details now. The consequence is that I don't leave any spaces in the log book names. However, I did find that '&' was fine, and the ampersand and %26 are interchangeable in a logbook page, so one logbook is ECP&SIW, and using ampersand or '%26' work interchangably when making llinks from other logbooks to ECP&SIW (that is elog:ECP&SIW or elog:ECP%26SIW work equally well).. This is not true of elog.cfg, where only the actual character should be used. This may be true for some other urlencoded characters.
It may be of note that %20 and '+' are not the same urlencode and character - %20 is a space, '+' is %2B, and a brief bit of playing around shows that elog is not so tolerant of those characters as it is with & and %26, and I crashed mine several times but I was only playing, nothing serious was lost.
|
Having written the above and posted it, I see the links for ECP&SIW I wrote here don't work the same as in my local logbook. I did check! Result is treat the above posting with caution. Although this is not the first time when something works fine on my local logbook but not here on the Mother of all elogs. Different flavour of linux? |
67626
|
Tue Nov 26 11:25:48 2013 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Linux | 2.9.2-2455 | Re: Problem with space in name of eLog not seeing %20 and "+" |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Tom C wrote: |
My elog is named "Whatever Elog" so the URL generated is /Whatever+Elog . This works fine but when in the interface certain buttons generate this URL : /Whatever%20Elog ...this URL fails. It seems that elog does not recognize these ( + and %20 ) as the same which I believe they should be as part of HTTP request.
|
Can you be a bit more specific which buttons you mean? The demo logbook https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Linux+Demo/ has also a space and I cannot see any problem there.
|
Years ago I had a similar issue, although I cannot remember the exact details now. The consequence is that I don't leave any spaces in the log book names. However, I did find that '&' was fine, and the ampersand and %26 are interchangeable in a logbook page, so one logbook is ECP&SIW, and using ampersand or '%26' work interchangably when making llinks from other logbooks to ECP&SIW (that is elog:ECP&SIW or elog:ECP%26SIW work equally well).. This is not true of elog.cfg, where only the actual character should be used. This may be true for some other urlencoded characters.
It may be of note that %20 and '+' are not the same urlencode and character - %20 is a space, '+' is %2B, and a brief bit of playing around shows that elog is not so tolerant of those characters as it is with & and %26, and I crashed mine several times but I was only playing, nothing serious was lost. |
67625
|
Tue Nov 26 08:17:34 2013 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.2-2455 | Re: Problem with space in name of eLog not seeing %20 and "+" |
Tom C wrote: |
My elog is named "Whatever Elog" so the URL generated is /Whatever+Elog . This works fine but when in the interface certain buttons generate this URL : /Whatever%20Elog ...this URL fails. It seems that elog does not recognize these ( + and %20 ) as the same which I believe they should be as part of HTTP request.
|
Can you be a bit more specific which buttons you mean? The demo logbook https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Linux+Demo/ has also a space and I cannot see any problem there. |
67624
|
Tue Nov 26 00:06:02 2013 |
| Tom C | tcheek@tulane.edu | Question | Linux | 2.9.2-2455 | Problem with space in name of eLog not seeing %20 and "+" | My elog is named "Whatever Elog" so the URL generated is /Whatever+Elog . This works fine but when in the interface certain buttons generate this URL : /Whatever%20Elog ...this URL fails. It seems that elog does not recognize these ( + and %20 ) as the same which I believe they should be as part of HTTP request. |
67623
|
Fri Nov 15 23:02:03 2013 |
| Hung Dao | hungtdao@yahoo.com | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Re: Unwanted characters showing when using Bottom Text Login to a html file |
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Hung Dao wrote: |
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Hung Dao wrote: |
When using Bottom Text Login to a html file showing some unwanted characters. Also, the ELOG Version is longer displayed. Bottom Text Login = example.htm Attached are bottomtextlogin.jpg which shows the characters on the left and example.htm which I used. |
I have a possible explanation for this problem, but it is just guess work. If I'm right, then just download the latest ELOG version and it will work properly again.
- You've downloaded an elog version from git, which still contained the line 12 in elogd.c: char svn_revision[] = "$Id$";
- Since you did checkout from git, the $Id$ was not substituted.
- ELOG trys to extract the version by this: rsprintf
("<center><a class=\"bottomlink\" title=\"%s\" href=\"https://midas.psi.ch/elog/\">ELOG V%s-%d</a></center>",
loc("Goto ELOG home page"), VERSION, atoi(svn_revision + 13));
- svn_revision + 13 is pointing into the void. Still I would have expected that you get a number as a result.
My advice: download again and retry.
⇄
English (auto-detected) » English
|
I have downloaded a latest version. It has displayed the new version as ELOG V2.9.2-bac715d where seems defined in GIT_REVISION as I guess. Then I set Bottom Text Login to a html file, it still shows those unwanted characters.
|
⇄
English (auto-detected) » English
Okay, why don't you just remove the unwanted characters from the html file? Because the attached file contains exactly those characters.
|
Yes, unwanted characters are in my file. In fact, they are not visible under some editor. So, I have found a reference from this site http://www.ventrino.com/blog/60/2008/07/three-little-characters-i%C2%BB%C2%BF-designed-to-make-your-life-hell/ about how to remove them. Basically, file's properties has to set to either ASCII or Encode as UTF-8 without BOM. Thanks. |
|