ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
68265
|
Wed Feb 24 09:48:09 2016 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.0.0 | Re: Kerberos auth not available on 3.0 ? | Hi Jimmy, no Kerberos is not compiled into the Windows installer. You are the first one asking for that under Windows. All other Kerberos users use Linux so far. You have to compile the Windows version yourelf. This is because there are several versions of Kerberos around and people need differnt libraries. Sorry for that.
/Stefan
Jimmy Bria wrote: |
Hi Stefan - Do you know is Kerberos is available (compiled) on the Windows installer?
-Jimmy
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Kerberos support is not compiled into the binary RPM. You have to comile from sources to get that. The reason is that there are different Kerberos libraries around, and different people need different ones.
/Stefan
|
|
|
68426
|
Sun Sep 18 03:31:42 2016 |
| Darren Hollinrake | hollinrakedp@gmail.com | Bug fix | Linux | 3.0.0 | Re: notification error services in CentOS 6.5 | The quick fix I found was to uncomment line 10 in the init.d file. (This was tested on a CentOS 6.8 AWS instance.)
. /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions
This will allow the status command to function properly.
Clean install:
[centos@ip-172-31-51-59 ~]$ service elogd status
status: invalid option: -p
After uncommenting line 10:
[centos@ip-172-31-51-59 ~]$ service elogd status
elogd (pid 11438) is running...
When you start elog it still won't show that the service started successfully (No 'OK'). If you go to stop the service, it will give you the proper 'OK' indicating it stopped successfully.
So to fix the missing 'OK' (or 'FAILED') we need to update the start section around line 51 as follows:
touch /var/lock/subsys/elogd
echo_success
else
echo_failure
fi
echo
;;
I've attached my modified init file which I believe corrects the above issues. I will say though that I'm not a programmer so I won't guarantee it's perfect. I haven't checked to see if CentOS 7 works with this modified version. Just checked it on a CentOS 7.2 AWS instance and it also appears to function correctly.
[root@oceana ~]# systemctl status elogd
● elogd.service - SYSV: ELOG is a weblog with integrated database
Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/elogd)
Active: active (running) since Sun 2016-09-18 22:35:44 UTC; 7s ago
Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8)
Process: 2263 ExecStop=/etc/rc.d/init.d/elogd stop (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Process: 2275 ExecStart=/etc/rc.d/init.d/elogd start (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Main PID: 2277 (elogd)
CGroup: /system.slice/elogd.service
└─2277 /usr/local/sbin/elogd -D -c /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2277]: elogd 3.1.1 built Aug 4 20...0
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2277]: revision
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2277]: Falling back to default gro..."
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2277]: Falling back to default use..."
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2277]: CKeditor detected
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana systemd[1]: Started SYSV: ELOG is a webl....
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2279]: Falling back to default gro..."
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2279]: Falling back to default use..."
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2277]: ImageMagick detected
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2277]: SSLServer listening on port....
Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full.
The old SysV style commands ('service elogd start|stop|status') also function correctly.
[root@oceana ~]# service elogd stop
Stopping elogd (via systemctl): [ OK ]
[root@oceana ~]# service elogd start
Starting elogd (via systemctl): [ OK ]
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
The init script supplied with elog was originally written for Redhat. It seems like CentOS has slightly changed the init daemon management, but I'm not an expert on that, nor do I have CentOS installed. If somebody comes with a fixed elogd.init for CentOS, I'm happy to include that in the distribution.
/Stefan
Banata wrote: |
hello, I just upgrade from 2.9 into 3.0.0 in CentOS 6.5
but after upgrade, I can't check elogd services via command line
service elogd status,
always result in missing argument, while it works with httpd or mysqld services and old elogd version.
I try to uninstall and install rom scratch and same result,
Okay I give you screenshoot of that,
you may notice, on check service status and stopping services, error resulted
|
|
|
68427
|
Wed Sep 21 17:23:15 2016 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug fix | Linux | 3.0.0 | Re: notification error services in CentOS 6.5 | Ok, I will include this patch in the distribution.
Stefan
Darren Hollinrake wrote: |
The quick fix I found was to uncomment line 10 in the init.d file. (This was tested on a CentOS 6.8 AWS instance.)
. /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions
This will allow the status command to function properly.
Clean install:
[centos@ip-172-31-51-59 ~]$ service elogd status
status: invalid option: -p
After uncommenting line 10:
[centos@ip-172-31-51-59 ~]$ service elogd status
elogd (pid 11438) is running...
When you start elog it still won't show that the service started successfully (No 'OK'). If you go to stop the service, it will give you the proper 'OK' indicating it stopped successfully.
So to fix the missing 'OK' (or 'FAILED') we need to update the start section around line 51 as follows:
touch /var/lock/subsys/elogd
echo_success
else
echo_failure
fi
echo
;;
I've attached my modified init file which I believe corrects the above issues. I will say though that I'm not a programmer so I won't guarantee it's perfect. I haven't checked to see if CentOS 7 works with this modified version. Just checked it on a CentOS 7.2 AWS instance and it also appears to function correctly.
[root@oceana ~]# systemctl status elogd
● elogd.service - SYSV: ELOG is a weblog with integrated database
Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/elogd)
Active: active (running) since Sun 2016-09-18 22:35:44 UTC; 7s ago
Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8)
Process: 2263 ExecStop=/etc/rc.d/init.d/elogd stop (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Process: 2275 ExecStart=/etc/rc.d/init.d/elogd start (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Main PID: 2277 (elogd)
CGroup: /system.slice/elogd.service
└─2277 /usr/local/sbin/elogd -D -c /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2277]: elogd 3.1.1 built Aug 4 20...0
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2277]: revision
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2277]: Falling back to default gro..."
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2277]: Falling back to default use..."
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2277]: CKeditor detected
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana systemd[1]: Started SYSV: ELOG is a webl....
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2279]: Falling back to default gro..."
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2279]: Falling back to default use..."
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2277]: ImageMagick detected
Sep 18 22:35:44 oceana elogd[2277]: SSLServer listening on port....
Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full.
The old SysV style commands ('service elogd start|stop|status') also function correctly.
[root@oceana ~]# service elogd stop
Stopping elogd (via systemctl): [ OK ]
[root@oceana ~]# service elogd start
Starting elogd (via systemctl): [ OK ]
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
The init script supplied with elog was originally written for Redhat. It seems like CentOS has slightly changed the init daemon management, but I'm not an expert on that, nor do I have CentOS installed. If somebody comes with a fixed elogd.init for CentOS, I'm happy to include that in the distribution.
/Stefan
Banata wrote: |
hello, I just upgrade from 2.9 into 3.0.0 in CentOS 6.5
but after upgrade, I can't check elogd services via command line
service elogd status,
always result in missing argument, while it works with httpd or mysqld services and old elogd version.
I try to uninstall and install rom scratch and same result,
Okay I give you screenshoot of that,
you may notice, on check service status and stopping services, error resulted
|
|
|
|
68072
|
Wed Aug 5 02:59:50 2015 |
| William Wong | william.wong@fortisbc.com | Question | Windows | 3.0 | ELOG 3.0 plus and MS Windows issues. | Greetings all. A few ELOG users have posted issues with ELOG 3.0 and newer not working with a variety of MS Windows operating systems,.
I have also encountered a similar problem in my environment.
For the following operating systems:
1) Windows XP SP3 (32-bit)
2) Windows Server 2003 SP 2 (32-bit)
when either elog.exe or elogd.exe are run from command line or file manager, the operating system reports the program is not a Win32 application.
I have other test computers that succesfully ran ELOG 3.0, 3.1 and 3.1.1
1) Windows Vista Enterprise (32-bit)
2) Windows 7 Professional (64-bit)
Has ELOG 3.x and newer changed in regards to support for MS Windows but is not documented on the
official ELOG documentation?
Any help would be most appreciated.
NOTE: The current production ELOG I use on Windows Server 2003 is 2.92-2475 but I would like to use the
features available on the 3,.x versions. Unfortunately, I am not able to change my production operating system.
|
68073
|
Wed Aug 5 12:09:47 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 3.0 | Re: ELOG 3.0 plus and MS Windows issues. | I recompiled the executables according to
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj851139.aspx
and replaces the elog311-1.exe distribution. Can you try if it works? Unfortunately I don't have a XP machine here.
/Stefan
William Wong wrote: |
Greetings all. A few ELOG users have posted issues with ELOG 3.0 and newer not working with a variety of MS Windows operating systems,.
I have also encountered a similar problem in my environment.
For the following operating systems:
1) Windows XP SP3 (32-bit)
2) Windows Server 2003 SP 2 (32-bit)
when either elog.exe or elogd.exe are run from command line or file manager, the operating system reports the program is not a Win32 application.
I have other test computers that succesfully ran ELOG 3.0, 3.1 and 3.1.1
1) Windows Vista Enterprise (32-bit)
2) Windows 7 Professional (64-bit)
Has ELOG 3.x and newer changed in regards to support for MS Windows but is not documented on the
official ELOG documentation?
Any help would be most appreciated.
NOTE: The current production ELOG I use on Windows Server 2003 is 2.92-2475 but I would like to use the
features available on the 3,.x versions. Unfortunately, I am not able to change my production operating system.
|
|
68074
|
Wed Aug 5 23:36:29 2015 |
| William Wong | william.wong@fortisbc.com | Question | Windows | 3.0 | Re: ELOG 3.0 plus and MS Windows issues. | Thank you for recompiling ELOG. Unfortunately, there is no change in all the test machines
I ran the newly compiled ELOG 3.1.1-1 on. I will use the 2.x version until our systems move
to a new operating system or I can find someone in my IT department who knows how to compile programs
from the source code.
If anyone else has suggestions or could compile the source for us to try, please speak up. There are
many installations of obsolete operating systems in production :
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
I recompiled the executables according to
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj851139.aspx
and replaces the elog311-1.exe distribution. Can you try if it works? Unfortunately I don't have a XP machine here.
/Stefan
William Wong wrote: |
Greetings all. A few ELOG users have posted issues with ELOG 3.0 and newer not working with a variety of MS Windows operating systems,.
I have also encountered a similar problem in my environment.
For the following operating systems:
1) Windows XP SP3 (32-bit)
2) Windows Server 2003 SP 2 (32-bit)
when either elog.exe or elogd.exe are run from command line or file manager, the operating system reports the program is not a Win32 application.
I have other test computers that succesfully ran ELOG 3.0, 3.1 and 3.1.1
1) Windows Vista Enterprise (32-bit)
2) Windows 7 Professional (64-bit)
Has ELOG 3.x and newer changed in regards to support for MS Windows but is not documented on the
official ELOG documentation?
Any help would be most appreciated.
NOTE: The current production ELOG I use on Windows Server 2003 is 2.92-2475 but I would like to use the
features available on the 3,.x versions. Unfortunately, I am not able to change my production operating system.
|
|
|
Draft
|
Fri Aug 7 16:13:09 2015 |
| Richard Stamper | richard.stamper@stfc.ac.uk | Question | Windows | 3.0 | Re: ELOG 3.0 plus and MS Windows issues. |
William Wong wrote: |
Thank you for recompiling ELOG. Unfortunately, there is no change in all the test machines
I ran the newly compiled ELOG 3.1.1-1 on. I will use the 2.x version until our systems move
to a new operating system or I can find someone in my IT department who knows how to compile programs
from the source code.
If anyone else has suggestions or could compile the source for us to try, please speak up. There are
many installations of obsolete operating systems in production :
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
I recompiled the executables according to
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj851139.aspx
and replaces the elog311-1.exe distribution. Can you try if it works? Unfortunately I don't have a XP machine here.
/Stefan
William Wong wrote: |
Greetings all. A few ELOG users have posted issues with ELOG 3.0 and newer not working with a variety of MS Windows operating systems,.
I have also encountered a similar problem in my environment.
For the following operating systems:
1) Windows XP SP3 (32-bit)
2) Windows Server 2003 SP 2 (32-bit)
when either elog.exe or elogd.exe are run from command line or file manager, the operating system reports the program is not a Win32 application.
I have other test computers that succesfully ran ELOG 3.0, 3.1 and 3.1.1
1) Windows Vista Enterprise (32-bit)
2) Windows 7 Professional (64-bit)
Has ELOG 3.x and newer changed in regards to support for MS Windows but is not documented on the
official ELOG documentation?
Any help would be most appreciated.
NOTE: The current production ELOG I use on Windows Server 2003 is 2.92-2475 but I would like to use the
features available on the 3,.x versions. Unfortunately, I am not able to change my production operating system.
|
|
|
|
69574
|
Thu Oct 20 10:04:51 2022 |
| Finn Junker | fj@tvis.net | Request | Windows | 3-1-4 | Up to date windows version | Dear Developers
I know this topic i on and off in this forum but it seems the only updated versions of Elog are in the linux binaries. Have anybody been able to compile a windows versions since 2018?
Kind Regards Finn |
|