| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
66184
|
Wed Jan 28 14:39:56 2009 |
 | Michael Ambrus | ambrmi09@gmail.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.5 | Re: Stack error when email notification is active |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Michael Ambrus wrote: |
|
| Michael Ambrus wrote: |
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Michael Ambrus wrote: |
|
Stack error is caused when an entry is submitted in a e-mail notification enabled log when a new entry is submitted. This error does not happen on linux (same Elog version, same config file).
Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help.
-----------------------------2916890032591
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="attfile"; filename=""
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
-----------------------------2916890032591--
timezone: 0, offset: 0
6 [main] elogd 2816 _cygtls::handle_exceptions: Error while dumping state
(probably corrupted stack)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
|
Cygwin is not officially supported. Can you try the Windows binaries?
|
Sorry, I didn't know there were any (I've not used Elog for years and I think Cygwin was the only way back then). Tried them now and they seem to work. At least no stack error is caused. I'm getting some other error, but I think it's the handshake with the SMTP. I'll validate it's OK until tomorrow.
Windows binaries also solved the issue with the "Top grop" in my other bug rapport.
Thanks for the help!
|
Unfortunately can't validate this right now. I'm at a remote network trying to get ELOG on my Windows laptop working with e-mail notifications. Either my normal ISP will not allow the SMTP to accept relaying from external networks, or something else is wrong.
The Windows binary is behaving somewhat differently, it seems to behave like earlier versions. I.e. the error message seen on the browser (Error sending Email via "smtp.xxx.xxx") is very limited. Logging (level 6) will not revile much and -v doesn't output any hints either. Assuming the first possible cause, I registered a account at gmail to try see if their SMTP would allow e-mail relaying. Trying with the Windows binary version I seemingly leads to the same result (i.e. I don't see much and the error seen at the browser is the same). However, when trying to run ELOG on a machine at my home network the message is different:
Error sending Email via "smtp.gmail.com": 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first. w40sm7583927ugc.6
The message does not surprise me (from previous experience, TLS was what made made postfix complicated to set up too). But what does surprise me is that the messages differ between the two (ELOG V2.7.5 running on a Linux machine and the Windows binary of the same version). Does Linux/Windows versions differ by conditionals in the code or did I somehow get an older Windows binary?
It would also be helpful knowing if ayone has got ELOG working with smtp.gmail.com.
Regards /Michael
|
The Windows Binaries are not recompiled for each minor modification. You should check the SVN revistion (the number which shows up at the very bottom of the page, which is 2153 in this case). It might well be that the Windows Binaries do not yet contain the modification for extended SMTP error report.
Furthermore, TLS is not supported in elogd, only plain SMTP is possible.
|
Thanks for the info, it saves me some time know this on beforehand.
You're right about the Windows binary, it's a lower SVN revision (2140).
|
|
67128
|
Mon Sep 26 10:38:59 2011 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2418 | Re: Spurious characters in the searched string |
| Olivier Callot wrote: |
|
Hi,
We have a problem with the search command: Since our last upgrade to v2.9.0-2418 the searched string is pre- and postfixed with ASCII character expressed in % format, see the attached image. The searched string is prefied with %255E and postfxed by %2524 in the URL. And teh search fails. This affects searches from drop-down menus.
Thanks in advance.
|
Strange. In this forum it works without extra characters. Just try it yourself. Do you have any strange configuration? Can you send me a minimal elogd.cfg which produces that error, maybe derived from the example elogd.cfg from the distribution.
- Stefan |
|
67129
|
Mon Sep 26 11:16:19 2011 |
| Olivier Callot | Olivier.Callot@cern.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2418 | Re: Spurious characters in the searched string |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Olivier Callot wrote: |
|
Hi,
We have a problem with the search command: Since our last upgrade to v2.9.0-2418 the searched string is pre- and postfixed with ASCII character expressed in % format, see the attached image. The searched string is prefied with %255E and postfxed by %2524 in the URL. And teh search fails. This affects searches from drop-down menus.
Thanks in advance.
|
Strange. In this forum it works without extra characters. Just try it yourself. Do you have any strange configuration? Can you send me a minimal elogd.cfg which produces that error, maybe derived from the example elogd.cfg from the distribution.
- Stefan
|
Well, It may be our implementation of re-routing web requests: The requested string in elog is prefixed by %5E (^) and postfixed by %24 ($). But in my case, the '%' is again escaped as %25 so the prefix becomes %255E that is not understood by elog as being '^' ...
I will see with my experts in routing if this is something that can be fixed in our configuration. But when elog processes the input string, it should un-escape these characters and find back the '^', no? |
|
67131
|
Mon Sep 26 14:49:48 2011 |
| Olivier Callot | Olivier.Callot@cern.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2418 | Re: Spurious characters in the searched string |
| Olivier Callot wrote: |
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Olivier Callot wrote: |
|
Hi,
We have a problem with the search command: Since our last upgrade to v2.9.0-2418 the searched string is pre- and postfixed with ASCII character expressed in % format, see the attached image. The searched string is prefied with %255E and postfxed by %2524 in the URL. And teh search fails. This affects searches from drop-down menus.
Thanks in advance.
|
Strange. In this forum it works without extra characters. Just try it yourself. Do you have any strange configuration? Can you send me a minimal elogd.cfg which produces that error, maybe derived from the example elogd.cfg from the distribution.
- Stefan
|
Well, It may be our implementation of re-routing web requests: The requested string in elog is prefixed by %5E (^) and postfixed by %24 ($). But in my case, the '%' is again escaped as %25 so the prefix becomes %255E that is not understood by elog as being '^' ...
I will see with my experts in routing if this is something that can be fixed in our configuration. But when elog processes the input string, it should un-escape these characters and find back the '^', no?
|
It turned out to be a setting of our re-routing of requests that re-escaped the '%'. Sorry for the noise. Cheers |
|
69455
|
Mon Jan 3 19:11:08 2022 |
 | Phil Rubin | rubinp@cern.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.3 | Re: Spurious characters in the searched string | Hi,
Ten years later...this problem shows up in my installation behind Apache, affecting only drop-down menu searches. Test installations with elog serving itself do not show the problem, so I presume it has something to do with Apache configuration, re-routing, etc. Unfortunately, this thread did not provide any details of the solution.
The problem looks like this:
Type: %255ERoutine%2524
or, in the url:
https://servername/?Type=%25255ERoutine%252524
Removing 2525 from front and back of the url makes everything work.
The only rewrite entries in the configuration file(s) are:
## Rewrite rules
RewriteEngine On
#redirect non-SSL traffic to SSL site
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteRule (.*) https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI}
Perhaps there's a rewrite rule that could be added to block the 2525? Something like:
RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} 2525
RewriteRule .* - [F,L]
I don't have a lot of experience configuring Apache, so any suggestions would be welcome.
Thanks.
Phil
| Olivier Callot wrote: |
|
| Olivier Callot wrote: |
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Olivier Callot wrote: |
|
Hi,
We have a problem with the search command: Since our last upgrade to v2.9.0-2418 the searched string is pre- and postfixed with ASCII character expressed in % format, see the attached image. The searched string is prefied with %255E and postfxed by %2524 in the URL. And teh search fails. This affects searches from drop-down menus.
Thanks in advance.
|
Strange. In this forum it works without extra characters. Just try it yourself. Do you have any strange configuration? Can you send me a minimal elogd.cfg which produces that error, maybe derived from the example elogd.cfg from the distribution.
- Stefan
|
Well, It may be our implementation of re-routing web requests: The requested string in elog is prefixed by %5E (^) and postfixed by %24 ($). But in my case, the '%' is again escaped as %25 so the prefix becomes %255E that is not understood by elog as being '^' ...
I will see with my experts in routing if this is something that can be fixed in our configuration. But when elog processes the input string, it should un-escape these characters and find back the '^', no?
|
It turned out to be a setting of our re-routing of requests that re-escaped the '%'. Sorry for the noise. Cheers
|
|
|
2042
|
Mon Nov 6 17:18:04 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Spell check |
| David Egolf wrote: | Is there a spell check that can be implemented in Elog or any recommended add on spell check?
|
I personally use Mozilla Firefox 2.0 which has already a built in spell checker. For MS IE, you can use IESpell (http://www.iespell.com). |
|
2043
|
Mon Nov 6 17:36:35 2006 |
| Fergus Lynch | flynch@alternativenetworks.com | Question | | | Re: Spell check |
| David Egolf wrote: | Sorry if this has been asked.
Is there a spell check that can be implemented in Elog or any recommended add on spell check?
Thanks,
David Egolf |
I find that the Google spell checker works very well in IE6. |
|
66288
|
Wed Apr 8 12:25:07 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.6.2 | Re: Specifying the size of am image attachment |
| Val Schmidt wrote: |
|
I'm curious, is it possible to specify (perhaps by default) the rendered size of an attached image. For example, I'd like all images uploaded to be scaled to 100% of the browser window size so a large image is not most off the screen. What I want is to specify the width="100" attribute of the <img /> tag, but it's not clear 1) how do to this for an attachment and 2) if it might be possible to do this in the config file for all img attachments.
|
When you use the ImageMagick package, attached images are scaled to a predefined size using the option "Thumbnail size = ...". See the documentation for that option for details. |
|