ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
67336
|
Sun Sep 16 18:40:06 2012 |
| Josef Uher | josef.uher@gmail.com | Question | All | 2.9.2 | HTML editor | Hi All,
maybe I missed something in the configuration, but how do I get this nice editor for HTML like the one available on this forum?
Thanks a lot for advice. |
67335
|
Fri Sep 14 17:59:44 2012 |
| Louis de Leseleuc | louis.deleseleuc@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.2-2455 | ELOG crashes when editing threads | Hi,
I am experiencing repeated crashing of the elog daemon.
If I go into select mode while in threaded view, I can select an entire thread by selecting the top entry.
When I do so then press the Edit button, the server crashes.
I have to manually restart it. Syslog shows no error.
This does not happen under Summary or Full view.
Running Ubuntu 12.04, ELOG 2.9.2-2455
I can provide my elog.cfg if necessary.
Cheers!
Louis
P.S. i just crashed the forums ELOG following those same steps!! Sorry!! At least it was restarted in no time. |
67334
|
Wed Sep 12 10:50:40 2012 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.9 | Re: Type <attribute> = Date - Issue |
Garret Delaronde wrote: |
I haven't found anything in the forums about this. Apologies if its a duplicate.
I am fairly familiar with ELog, use it for multiple purposes on 5 different Virtual Servers at work.
Currently looking to do some updates to one of the instances with the Date Type setting.
We have 17,000 entries all which have had manual entries for a Date Attribute for the last year and 8 months.
Due to regular entry errors on part of our contractors using it, (Eg: using "Aug" instead of "08", or using "-" instead of "/"), I want to change over to using the date type attribute (Type <attribute> = Date).
However the problem i found, the moment i save this in the config, and go to the list of entries, the date has changed on all of the entries to 12/31/1969. Which is BAD for our operation. So after removing the Type Date Setting the dates go back to normal.
Is there anyway to retain those dates so they display as they are and then only new entries would fall under the new date type setting?
Syntax manual didn't help much for this issue.
|
The problem is, that the existing entries have a string content for this specific attribute.
An attribute with a "date" type content should contain a integer number, which represents the seconds of the epoch (starting with zero on 1-Jan-1970 at 00:00:00).
What you need to do is writing a script that reads all *a.log files in the logbook directory and converts lines of the type:
<attribute>: <text>
to lines like
<attribute>: $(date -d "<text>" +%s)
Unfortunately elog does not provide you with such a tool.
But since you have to write it now anyway now, you could submit your code to this forum 
Andreas |
67333
|
Mon Sep 10 17:18:03 2012 |
| Garret Delaronde | garret.delaronde@gmail.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.9 | Re: Type <attribute> = Date - Issue |
David Pilgram wrote: |
Garret Delaronde wrote: |
I haven't found anything in the forums about this. Apologies if its a duplicate.
I am fairly familiar with ELog, use it for multiple purposes on 5 different Virtual Servers at work.
Currently looking to do some updates to one of the instances with the Date Type setting.
We have 17,000 entries all which have had manual entries for a Date Attribute for the last year and 8 months.
Due to regular entry errors on part of our contractors using it, (Eg: using "Aug" instead of "08", or using "-" instead of "/"), I want to change over to using the date type attribute (Type <attribute> = Date).
However the problem i found, the moment i save this in the config, and go to the list of entries, the date has changed on all of the entries to 12/31/1969. Which is BAD for our operation. So after removing the Type Date Setting the dates go back to normal.
Is there anyway to retain those dates so they display as they are and then only new entries would fall under the new date type setting?
Syntax manual didn't help much for this issue.
|
Hi Garret,
Why cannot you just use $entry time ? It uses the date that the entry was made which appears as the first line of every elog entry -
[Sorry for mis-post, just discovered cannot put the 'dollar at' control set in an entry]
MID: 12458
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:22:06 +0100
In reply to: 12453
You can use 'Time format = ' to get the date to display in the format you like. You will see I have posted an issue about 'Date format = '. I mention this because in trying to understand what was happening, I too had a case where all the dates were showing as the same in a thread. I suspect your 12/31/1969 was due to the entries as being read were non-existant or blank.
Of course I may have mis-understood your requirements.
|
Tried using the Time format setting, however I only want the time to be selected, so when i enter the datetime type it shows the date and time.
If there was a way to just have the time to be drop down menus vs the date and time all together, I would find that helpful.
As for the "$entry time" suggestion, it only serves to log the exact time the entry was made into elog. Where as I want it to be manually set.
In this example we've created an sql script to pull information from an oracle database, which then creates an elog entry.
We have multiple fields which are populated and locked so only admin can edit them.
Our contractor then edits the entry with a date / time / location, and a few other things.
the Date and Time are separate attributes. We'd prefer to keep it like that just because of the other scripts that run on the elog entries, (pulls day by day reports and formats and calculates summaries in excel automatically).
Any other suggestions would be helpful.
Thanks for your reply. |
67332
|
Fri Sep 7 19:08:27 2012 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Bug report | Windows | 2.9 | Re: Type <attribute> = Date - Issue |
Garret Delaronde wrote: |
I haven't found anything in the forums about this. Apologies if its a duplicate.
I am fairly familiar with ELog, use it for multiple purposes on 5 different Virtual Servers at work.
Currently looking to do some updates to one of the instances with the Date Type setting.
We have 17,000 entries all which have had manual entries for a Date Attribute for the last year and 8 months.
Due to regular entry errors on part of our contractors using it, (Eg: using "Aug" instead of "08", or using "-" instead of "/"), I want to change over to using the date type attribute (Type <attribute> = Date).
However the problem i found, the moment i save this in the config, and go to the list of entries, the date has changed on all of the entries to 12/31/1969. Which is BAD for our operation. So after removing the Type Date Setting the dates go back to normal.
Is there anyway to retain those dates so they display as they are and then only new entries would fall under the new date type setting?
Syntax manual didn't help much for this issue.
|
Hi Garret,
Why cannot you just use $entry time ? It uses the date that the entry was made which appears as the first line of every elog entry -
[Sorry for mis-post, just discovered cannot put the 'dollar at' control set in an entry]
MID: 12458
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:22:06 +0100
In reply to: 12453
You can use 'Time format = ' to get the date to display in the format you like. You will see I have posted an issue about 'Date format = '. I mention this because in trying to understand what was happening, I too had a case where all the dates were showing as the same in a thread. I suspect your 12/31/1969 was due to the entries as being read were non-existant or blank.
Of course I may have mis-understood your requirements.
|
67331
|
Fri Sep 7 18:19:38 2012 |
| Garret Delaronde | garret.delaronde@gmail.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.9 | Type <attribute> = Date - Issue | I haven't found anything in the forums about this. Apologies if its a duplicate.
I am fairly familiar with ELog, use it for multiple purposes on 5 different Virtual Servers at work.
Currently looking to do some updates to one of the instances with the Date Type setting.
We have 17,000 entries all which have had manual entries for a Date Attribute for the last year and 8 months.
Due to regular entry errors on part of our contractors using it, (Eg: using "Aug" instead of "08", or using "-" instead of "/"), I want to change over to using the date type attribute (Type <attribute> = Date).
However the problem i found, the moment i save this in the config, and go to the list of entries, the date has changed on all of the entries to 12/31/1969. Which is BAD for our operation. So after removing the Type Date Setting the dates go back to normal.
Is there anyway to retain those dates so they display as they are and then only new entries would fall under the new date type setting?
Syntax manual didn't help much for this issue. |
67330
|
Thu Aug 30 22:47:50 2012 |
| Szu-Ching Peckner | speckner@nd.edu | Question | Linux | latest | Re: secure way to allow users create logbook |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Szu-Ching Peckner wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Szu-Ching Peckner wrote: |
I don't think there is a good secure way so far, but would like to have your opinion.
If I want user to create logbook for themselves, what's the best way to do it? I guess Execute $attribute = <command> may work, have it write to cfg file, but obviously it impose security problem. Is there a good and secure way to allow user to create logbook themselves?
|
Actually there is no good secure way. What I usually do is to give users admin rights on individual logbooks, then they can change the config of that logbook. Many times adding some attribute is as good as creating new logbooks. Like if you need two logbooks "home" and "work", you can create an attribute "type" and let the type be "home" or "work". With conditional attributes you can make the logbook behave differently for the two values of "type" and get most functionality of two separate logbooks.
- Stefan
|
Is there a way to set user permission based on certain attribute? can Allow command = <user list> based on attribute?
for example, say type home, user1 can read, user2 can write, user3 can not access type home, but can access type work.
In short, is access control available when I use type to get functionality of separate logbooks? If so, how is this access control done?
|
Actually I never tried that. Using conditional attributes, you could try that out, but no guarantee that it works. Like
Options type = home{1}, work{2}
{1}Login user = you, me
{2}Login user = me, other
You could play with "login user", "Allow command" and "Deny command".
/Stefan
|
Thanks for reply Stefan.
I tried it, didnt work. I think its expected it didn't work though, or maybe I didn't try it right.
==============
[logbook1]
Login user = user1
Options Type = Home{1}, Work{2}
{1} Login user = user2
This will make user2 unable to login logbook1 at all
============
[logbook1]
Login user = user1, user2
Options Type = Home{1}, Work{2}
{1} Login user = user1
{2} Login user = user2
user1 can login, can search Work type entries, create new entry with Work type.
==============
[logbook1]
Login user = user1, user2
Options Type = Home{1}, Work{2}
{1} Deny New = user1
user1 can still create entries for Home type. I think it's because when user1 login, command New is available for user1, so when user1 click on New, doesn't matter what type user1 choose, submit button is available. If I have Deny New = user1 under logbook1, New is not available, that means user1 can't create entry for Work type either.
===============
seems to me under current code, access control has to be done based on logbook, not attribute. Do you agree?
if that's the case, we may have a lot of logbook because of access control we want to implement. So there is another question:
selection page show all logbooks. Is there a way to make selection page and tabs show logbooks based on user access?
For example, we have 20 logbooks, user1 has acces to 3, when user1 login, selection page only shows that 3 logbooks for user1, and only 3 tabs for user1.
I thought about using group to get logbooks more organized, however I will still face the situation that one group may have 20 logbooks.
Or what would you do to handle this situation? (I asked selection page question earlier in another entry). Maybe we should discuss on that entry? Message ID: 67319
Thanks again.
|
67329
|
Thu Aug 30 10:00:07 2012 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | latest | Re: secure way to allow users create logbook |
Szu-Ching Peckner wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Szu-Ching Peckner wrote: |
I don't think there is a good secure way so far, but would like to have your opinion.
If I want user to create logbook for themselves, what's the best way to do it? I guess Execute $attribute = <command> may work, have it write to cfg file, but obviously it impose security problem. Is there a good and secure way to allow user to create logbook themselves?
|
Actually there is no good secure way. What I usually do is to give users admin rights on individual logbooks, then they can change the config of that logbook. Many times adding some attribute is as good as creating new logbooks. Like if you need two logbooks "home" and "work", you can create an attribute "type" and let the type be "home" or "work". With conditional attributes you can make the logbook behave differently for the two values of "type" and get most functionality of two separate logbooks.
- Stefan
|
Is there a way to set user permission based on certain attribute? can Allow command = <user list> based on attribute?
for example, say type home, user1 can read, user2 can write, user3 can not access type home, but can access type work.
In short, is access control available when I use type to get functionality of separate logbooks? If so, how is this access control done?
|
Actually I never tried that. Using conditional attributes, you could try that out, but no guarantee that it works. Like
Options type = home{1}, work{2}
{1}Login user = you, me
{2}Login user = me, other
You could play with "login user", "Allow command" and "Deny command".
/Stefan |
|