Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 30 of 805  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject Text Attachments
  69626   Tue Jan 24 11:31:59 2023 Reply Edmund Blomleyedmund.blomley@kit.eduRequestAll-Re: Wikipedia Article deletedIf I understand it correctly I think it
has to be submitted for review with the blue
button on that page, just not sure if that
  
  69625   Mon Jan 23 22:24:23 2023 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestAll-Re: Wikipedia Article deletedI added some more references, that's
about all I can do. Not sure if that is
enough.
  
  69624   Mon Jan 23 21:21:56 2023 Reply Edmund Blomleyedmund.blomley@kit.eduRequestAll-Re: Wikipedia Article deletedIt was now moved to the Draft space (which
I did not even now existed so far): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ELOG

  
  69623   Fri Jan 20 14:11:52 2023 Question Tamas Galtgal@km3net.deQuestionLinux3.1.3Re: Too many redirects when running behind load balancer?The issue is still present and now it's
quite urgent to move this last service into
the Swarm. Does anyone maybe have an idea
  
  Draft   Fri Jan 20 14:08:25 2023 Question Tamas Galhe iQuestionLinux3.1.3Re: Too many redirects when running behind load balancer?The issue is still present and now it's
quite urgent to move this last service into
the Swarm. Does anyone maybe have an idea
  
  69621   Fri Jan 20 13:12:48 2023 Reply Sebastian Schenksebastian.schenk@physik.uni-halle.deRequestAll-Re: Wikipedia Article deletedI have requested an undeletion of the article.
The article was deleted  "PROD",
which means that someone tagged it. And if
  
  69620   Fri Jan 20 10:25:23 2023 Reply Andreas Luedekeandreas.luedeke@psi.chRequestAll-Re: Wikipedia Article deletedIt looks to me like only an author
of an article can contradict a deletion.
I did not find a single method to even comment
  
  69619   Thu Jan 19 17:00:37 2023 Reply Stefan RittI astefan.ritt@psi.chRequestAll-Re: Wikipedia Article deletedI agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not
a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on
that, but better someone else.
  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6