| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
69626
|
Tue Jan 24 11:31:59 2023 |
 | Edmund Blomley | edmund.blomley@kit.edu | Request | All | - | Re: Wikipedia Article deleted | If I understand it correctly I think it has to be submitted for review with the blue button on that page, just not sure if that should come from your side or someone else
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
I added some more references, that's about all I can do. Not sure if that is enough.
Stefan
| Edmund Blomley wrote: |
|
It was now moved to the Draft space (which I did not even now existed so far): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ELOG
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
I have requested an undeletion of the article. The article was deleted "PROD", which means that someone tagged it. And if noone removes the tag, it could be deleted.
I could revive the article. So in the future, One should have an eye on it and maybe update the current version of the software.
If there iy an paper on the elog, maybe it could be cited for more creditability.
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
It looks to me like only an author of an article can contradict a deletion. I did not find a single method to even comment on the deletion.
I am not an Wikipedia expert, can anyone suggest on how to push for the article to be restored? Or do we just write it again, until people stop deleting it?
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69625
|
Mon Jan 23 22:24:23 2023 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | - | Re: Wikipedia Article deleted | I added some more references, that's about all I can do. Not sure if that is enough.
Stefan
| Edmund Blomley wrote: |
|
It was now moved to the Draft space (which I did not even now existed so far): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ELOG
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
I have requested an undeletion of the article. The article was deleted "PROD", which means that someone tagged it. And if noone removes the tag, it could be deleted.
I could revive the article. So in the future, One should have an eye on it and maybe update the current version of the software.
If there iy an paper on the elog, maybe it could be cited for more creditability.
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
It looks to me like only an author of an article can contradict a deletion. I did not find a single method to even comment on the deletion.
I am not an Wikipedia expert, can anyone suggest on how to push for the article to be restored? Or do we just write it again, until people stop deleting it?
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69624
|
Mon Jan 23 21:21:56 2023 |
| Edmund Blomley | edmund.blomley@kit.edu | Request | All | - | Re: Wikipedia Article deleted | It was now moved to the Draft space (which I did not even now existed so far): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ELOG
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
I have requested an undeletion of the article. The article was deleted "PROD", which means that someone tagged it. And if noone removes the tag, it could be deleted.
I could revive the article. So in the future, One should have an eye on it and maybe update the current version of the software.
If there iy an paper on the elog, maybe it could be cited for more creditability.
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
It looks to me like only an author of an article can contradict a deletion. I did not find a single method to even comment on the deletion.
I am not an Wikipedia expert, can anyone suggest on how to push for the article to be restored? Or do we just write it again, until people stop deleting it?
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.
|
|
|
|
|
|
69623
|
Fri Jan 20 14:11:52 2023 |
 | Tamas Gal | tgal@km3net.de | Question | Linux | 3.1.3 | Re: Too many redirects when running behind load balancer? | The issue is still present and now it's quite urgent to move this last service into the Swarm. Does anyone maybe have an idea what's wrong? To sum up: if there is a non-empty password file, the login page chokes in an infinite loop of redirects. I am using the same HAProxy load balancer configuration as for all the other services (running Apache, NGINX, GitLab, XWiki, etc.):
backend be_elog.km3net.de
mode http
option forwardfor except 127.0.0.1
http-request add-header X-Forwarded-Proto https if { ssl_fc }
server-template km3net-elog- 1 km3net-elog_elog:8080 check resolvers docker init-addr libc,none
| Tamas Gal wrote: |
|
Yes, I used the empty `passwd` file from example. When I then click on one of the logbooks, I get to the page where I can register a user (see attached screenshot). After clickin on "Save" for the user registration, I again get the redirect error. Once there is a registered user (i.e. a non-empty password file) the redirect issue is persistent. Any idea where the problem might be? I just emptied the password file again, so you can have a one-shot, if you like.
Btw. I have SSL termination in the load balancer, so ELOG does not need to do any SSL related things (the swarm is in a locally isolated network, so all internal communication between the load balancer and the swarm machines are safe). Maybe that's the issue? On the other hand, the main page loads fine and uses SSL termination too, so I don't know, maybe there is logic behind the authentication which collides with the SSL termination.
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
Yes I see the redirects. You say with the example logbook it works, right? Is it the password protection which triggers the problem or anything else? Does it work if you take out the password protection? The key is to identify which setting in your config file triggers the problem, so you can bracket the problem down between the example logbook and your logbook definition.
|
|
|
|
Draft
|
Fri Jan 20 14:08:25 2023 |
| Tamas Gal | he i | Question | Linux | 3.1.3 | Re: Too many redirects when running behind load balancer? | The issue is still present and now it's quite urgent to move this last service into the Swarm. Does anyone maybe have an idea what's wrong? To sum up: if there is a non-empty password file, the login page chokes in an infinite loop of redirects. I am using the same HAProxy load balancer configuration as for all the other services (running Apache, NGINX, GitLab, XWiki, etc.):
backend be_elog.km3net.de
mode http
option forwardfor except 127.0.0.1
http-request add-header X-Forwarded-Proto https if { ssl_fc }
server-template km3net-elog- 1 km3net-elog_elog:8080 check resolvers docker init-addr libc,none
| Tamas Gal wrote: |
|
Yes, I used the empty `passwd` file from example. When I then click on one of the logbooks, I get to the page where I can register a user (see attached screenshot). After clickin on "Save" for the user registration, I again get the redirect error. Once there is a registered user (i.e. a non-empty password file) the redirect issue is persistent. Any idea where the problem might be? I just emptied the password file again, so you can have a one-shot, if you like.
Btw. I have SSL termination in the load balancer, so ELOG does not need to do any SSL related things (the swarm is in a locally isolated network, so all internal communication between the load balancer and the swarm machines are safe). Maybe that's the issue? On the other hand, the main page loads fine and uses SSL termination too, so I don't know, maybe there is logic behind the authentication which collides with the SSL termination.
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
Yes I see the redirects. You say with the example logbook it works, right? Is it the password protection which triggers the problem or anything else? Does it work if you take out the password protection? The key is to identify which setting in your config file triggers the problem, so you can bracket the problem down between the example logbook and your logbook definition.
|
|
|
|
69621
|
Fri Jan 20 13:12:48 2023 |
| Sebastian Schenk | sebastian.schenk@physik.uni-halle.de | Request | All | - | Re: Wikipedia Article deleted | I have requested an undeletion of the article. The article was deleted "PROD", which means that someone tagged it. And if noone removes the tag, it could be deleted.
I could revive the article. So in the future, One should have an eye on it and maybe update the current version of the software.
If there iy an paper on the elog, maybe it could be cited for more creditability.
| Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
|
It looks to me like only an author of an article can contradict a deletion. I did not find a single method to even comment on the deletion.
I am not an Wikipedia expert, can anyone suggest on how to push for the article to be restored? Or do we just write it again, until people stop deleting it?
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.
|
|
|
|
|
69620
|
Fri Jan 20 10:25:23 2023 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Request | All | - | Re: Wikipedia Article deleted | It looks to me like only an author of an article can contradict a deletion. I did not find a single method to even comment on the deletion.
I am not an Wikipedia expert, can anyone suggest on how to push for the article to be restored? Or do we just write it again, until people stop deleting it?
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.
|
|
|
|
69619
|
Thu Jan 19 17:00:37 2023 |
| Stefan Ritt | I astefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | - | Re: Wikipedia Article deleted | I agree. I ahead ;-) I think it is not a good idea if the ELOG author pushes on that, but better someone else.
Best,
Stefan
| Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
|
Hello,
I noticed the wikipedia article of the ELOG got deleted in November 2021.
With the reason: "Poorly sourced article, and I was not able to find good sources myself."
I could access the old article through web.archive.org, but for the project it would be good, if the article got revived.
|
|
|