ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66892
|
Mon Sep 6 16:18:41 2010 |
| Robert Heine | heine@kph.uni-mainz.de | Comment | Windows | All | 2.8.-2312 | Re: How to make Subst run? |
Thank you Andreas!
So I will generate the preset entry in a shell script.
And now to something completely different:
Is there a way to make the elogd options -x and -install work together?
Grüßli
Robert |
66894
|
Mon Sep 6 21:36:51 2010 |
| Arno Teunisse | A.teeling3@chello.nl | Bug report | Windows | V2.7.7-224 | Re: fckedit and creating tables |
Arno Teunisse wrote: |
Hello
Using windows7 and the elogd 2.7.7 built Jul 31 2009, 13:01:20 revision 2246. I noticed a bug in the tables created with fckeditor. When on winxp there is no problem. So it seems windows7 related.
Don't know if I should post here or somewhere else. When i Click the table icon i get : 
When I want to continue ( Pressing Yes) i get 
So the OK button is removed, and i can only cancel. So it's impossible to create a new table in elog. ( yes , create it by hand, but that is not so nice )
Download the latest version of elog : elogd 2.8.0 built Aug 2 2010, 12:16:05 revision 2312 . Just to see if this helps. The result is the same.
Is there some solution/workaround for this ?
Thanks for elog : it's great.
|
Answer : Problem solved. It is not window7 related. When I did a fresh install ( not installing over the old directory ) everything is working as expected. So I did something wrong with installing over the old elog directory.
Thanks for you're time and the inconvenience.
|
66895
|
Wed Sep 8 15:31:33 2010 |
| Devin Bougie | dab66@cornell.edu | Request | Linux | 2.7.5 | difficulty with slow connections (was Re: frequent crashes on SL4) |
Hi Stefan,
> There was a timeout of 1 sec. in the elogd daemon, which probably is too short for a satellite connection. Unfortunately I have no satellite here
> around to test it, so I "blindly" increased it to 6 seconds in the current SVN version. Please give it a try.
The latest release (2.8.0-2313) does fix this problem. Our user is now able to modify entries and upload attachments using their satellite connection.
Thank you very much for your time and help. I am sorry I didn't receive this in time to help test the old SVN version.
Sincerely,
Devin |
66897
|
Mon Sep 13 09:23:29 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.8.-2312 | Re: How to setup elogd as windows service with shell execution? |
Robert Heine wrote: |
Dear colleagues,
I am trying to use the elogd as a service with activated shell-execution. Invoking 'elogd -x' on the command line works fine, as well as 'elogd -install'. The option 'elogd -x -install' does not seem to be implemented, so I followed two ways to get this to work:
1) creating my own service with instsrv/srvany and registry editing: starting 'elogd -x' does not work (error 1053), the -D option has to be added, to start the service without time out. But then shell execution seems to be not working, because no input to the elog is generated, but also no message saying shell execution was not enabled!
2) using 'elogd -install' and modifying the registry entry by adding the -x option to the command line in the 'HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\elogd\ImagePath': This enables shell execution, but instead of piping the output to the logbook, some DOS boxes pop up executing the shell command and terminate. No entries are generated.
Has anyone an idea?
|
I could never get shell execution work when elogd is started as a service. This has probably to do with system permissions or so under Windows. If anybody has a clue, please let me know. Under Linux this works nicely, but this is probably not an option for you... |
66900
|
Tue Sep 14 23:29:15 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | ELOG V2.8. | Re: Password problem after elogd restart |
Jack Dapid wrote: |
Hi.
I have ELOG V2.8.0-2313 installed on a SLC 5.5 release and all works fine, Users can register them-self and I see for each of them in the passwd file:
<name>test</name>
<password>***something***</password>
....
after a '/etc/rc.d/init.d/elogd restart' the logins don't work anymore (they did before the restart)
and the passwd file changed:
<name>test</name>
<password encoding="SHA256">***something else***</password>
....
Any idea what goes wrong?
Cheers, Jack
|
Please have a look at https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/66872 |
66901
|
Wed Sep 15 00:21:10 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.6-2230 | Re: SQL Database |
lance wrote: |
We have been running elog for a few years now and its solid. The only thing is we are getting to 140k entries over a few books and its starting to slow down whist searching. My questions is can we go to an SQL type database rather than a flat file? Is it worth it? Is anyone running this type of configuration?
|
Running through a SQL database requires a major rework of the software. I'm planning this in the long run, but not for this year. I'm also not sure how much this would buy you. If you do a full-text search on 140k entries in a SQL database (not index search), this might also take some time.
But what you can do is to "archive" part of your logbooks. Since the files are named YYMMDDa.log, you can move all 09XXXXXa.log files into a separate "archive" which you then do not include in your search. |
66902
|
Wed Sep 15 00:32:48 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | All | 2.8.0-2313 | Re: Searching Logbooks |
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I'm starting to get a similar problem to Lance's ("SQL Database"). Searching is beginning to take time.
>
> In searching, I either can search one logbook (still relatively quick), or all of them.
>
> I have my logbooks in groups, and often I know which group I want to search, and it would make the searching
> much quicker were the search confined to just that group. I don't think I've missed anything in the
> documentation on this matter.
>
> If not a change to the elog program, is there another way of (say) arranging the logbooks that will achieve this?
You can't do that right now. I would have to extend the functionality to allow searching in groups. Also have a look
at https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/66901. Maybe that helps a bit in meantime. |
66903
|
Wed Sep 15 01:02:26 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | V2.8.0-231 | Re: how to convert Common Era (C.E.) into Buddhist Era |
phichitpon wrote: |
how to convert Common Era (C.E.) into Buddhist Era such as C.E. 2010 to B.E. 2553 (2553=2010+543) .thank you
|
Uh, thank you for teaching me that something like B.E. exists. I didn't know before. Unfortunately elog relied on the underlying operating system date functions. I guess you have to convince Windows or Linux to switch to B.E., then elog will do as well. |