| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
66847
|
Sat Jun 12 05:55:39 2010 |
 | John Rouillard | rouilj+elog@cs.umb.edu | Bug report | Linux | Other | 2.7.8 | Re: elogd -C failing to sync password file with "Received invalid response from elogd server" message |
I pulled svn revision 2299 from svn and built it on both server and client side. It is working
properly now.
Thanks for the patch.
-- rouilj |
|
66846
|
Thu Jun 10 15:19:51 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.8 | Re: drop in replacement for FCKeditor? |
| Bill Pier wrote: |
|
Is it possible to use a drop-in replacement for the FCKeditor?
|
What is a drop-in replacement? |
|
66845
|
Thu Jun 10 15:10:19 2010 |
 | Bill Pier | bpier@clove.org | Question | Linux | 2.7.8 | drop in replacement for FCKeditor? |
Is it possible to use a drop-in replacement for the FCKeditor? |
|
66844
|
Wed Jun 9 08:26:20 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.8 | Re: change design part of the discussion board |
| Heinzmann wrote: |
|
I have done the changes to my logbock, but I think I have done something wrong. As an example, the window where you write in your note is not sized anymore like before. I have to scroll a lot to the right to see the right border of the window.
The only thing I have done was try to delete: the OS: Linux Window Mac OSC All Other info.
|
How should I know what you have done wrong if you don't tell me. It's like if you call your PC manufacturer and tell him: "My PC is not working, what is wrong?". So please send me your elogd.cfg, and make a few screen shots so that I know what is going on. |
|
66843
|
Tue Jun 8 23:08:41 2010 |
| Heinzmann | catman333@web.de | Question | Windows | 2.7.8 | Re: change design part of the discussion board |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Heinzmann wrote: |
|
Hello Stefan,
If I would like to change the design of the attached part of the discussion board like:
deleting OS: (including blue box) Linux Windows Mac OSX All Other (including green box)
Where and how could I do this?
Thank you
|
Well, the official forum at midas.psi.ch cannot be changed by you. But if you installed a local logbook similar to the one here, you simple go and edit the confitguration file elogd.cfg. Please read the documentation for further information.
|
Stefan,
I have done the changes to my logbock, but I think I have done something wrong. As an example, the window where you write in your note is not sized anymore like before. I have to scroll a lot to the right to see the right border of the window.
The only thing I have done was try to delete: the OS: Linux Window Mac OSC All Other info.
Please could you help me out?
|
|
66842
|
Tue Jun 8 16:33:07 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | 2.7.8 | Re: inline-code |
| Yoshio Imai wrote: | Sometimes, it is annoying that the [code] -Tag creates a line break, because there are situations where verbatim text inside the regular text flow is desirable (just like here). I would like to request an additional elcode-tag [ilcode] (in-line code) which translates to <code> instead of <pre> .
Yoshio |
The [code] tags produce <pre>...</pre> tags for multi-line listings, where several spaces should not be dropped to keep the formatting of some source code for example. I also want it sometimes in a single line, so what I do is to use a [FONT=Courier New] tag, which produces output very similar to <code>, but without line breaks. |
|
66841
|
Tue Jun 8 15:48:06 2010 |
| Yoshio Imai | | Request | All | 2.7.8 | inline-code |
Hi, Stefan!
Sometimes, it is annoying that the [code] -Tag creates a line break, because there are situations where verbatim text inside the regular text flow is desirable (just like here). I would like to request an additional elcode-tag [ilcode] (in-line code) which translates to <code> instead of <pre> .
Cheers
Yoshio |
|
66840
|
Tue Jun 8 12:02:36 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.8 | Re: Restricting logbook view |
| Allen wrote: |
|
Is there anyway to restrict access so that a user can only see the log entries they post or only replies to their log entry? I know it is possible to restrict editing to only posts they submitted, but I have a need to not even allow them to see other posts except for what they submitted and I am wondering if this is possible currently, or if this is planned, or could be planned for a future version?
|
No, this is not possible at the moment. As a workaround you could define one logbook per user, then restrict the user access to the individual logbooks. Of course this only makes sense if there are not too many users. |