Re: Possible misuse of email headers Message-Id and In-Reply-To, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 8 18:16:30 2017
|
A pull request would be highy appreciated, because you can then test it thoroughly on your side. Adding a random number to the message id is simple.
"Reply-to" indeed does not make sense since elog cannot receive emails. Most sites use a generic "noreply@<domain>" to indicate
to the user that a reply does not make sense. I guess the "Reply-to" does not have to be unique, right? |
Re: Possible misuse of email headers Message-Id and In-Reply-To, posted by fbretel on Wed Mar 15 16:04:13 2017
|
Pull-request posted. Cheers. |
Re: Possible misuse of email headers Message-Id and In-Reply-To, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 15 16:42:35 2017
|
Pull-request merged.
fbretel
wrote:
Pull-request posted. |
Re: Possible bug in elogd execute_shell, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 26 09:09:03 2016
|
Absolutely correct! Nice to see compilers getting better and better. I changed the code and committed it.
Nigel
Warr wrote:
I was just playing around with gcc6's new feature for warning about |
Re: Possible Formatting bug: Summary view, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jul 15 09:44:08 2004
|
> A temporary fix for this is to set summary lines = 0
Right, that's the only way. I would call this "permanent fix" (;-) |
Re: Possible Formatting bug: Summary view, posted by Steve Jones on Fri Jul 16 04:37:47 2004
|
> > A temporary fix for this is to set summary lines = 0
>
> Right, that's the only way. I would call this "permanent fix" (;-)
|
Re: Possible Bug: 2.3.7 : Welcome Title = < img src=, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue May 20 14:23:56 2003
|
> I noticed that my custom start page did not display the Welcome title icon.
> It worked fine in prior elogs.
>
|
Re: Possible Bug: 2.3.7 : Welcome Title = < img src=, posted by Fred Hooper on Tue May 20 19:09:26 2003
|
> > I noticed that my custom start page did not display the Welcome title icon.
> > It worked fine in prior elogs.
> >
|