Re: Is there (planned) support for <A NAME> and <HR /> in ELCODE?, posted by Kevin McCarty on Fri Apr 27 08:56:10 2007
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Kevin McCarty"]I am wondering if there is any support (or if not, if it is planned) for inserting HTML <a name> and <hr />
tags via ELCODE.[/quote]
|
Re: Is there (planned) support for <A NAME> and <HR /> in ELCODE?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Apr 27 13:06:59 2007
|
[quote="Kevin McCarty"]I am wondering if there is any support (or if not, if it is planned) for inserting HTML <a name> and <hr /> tags via ELCODE. This
would be useful for long log messages in order to provide a table of contents and divide them into clear sections. If this support already exists, I'm
afraid it is not obvious to me how to access it in ELCODE. If it does not yet exist, would you consider a patch for it?
|
Too many logbooks during user registration, posted by Steve Jones on Mon Aug 6 17:43:52 2007
|
Stefan, we require registration with elog. We have quite a number of logbooks and when someone requests a login account AND elects to register with all
of the logbooks, the resulting URL is apparently too long for browsers to handle when the admins click on the link embedded in the email notification.
For example, FireFox (latest ver) appears to truncate the URL *after* submission (the correct URL is there before submission).
|
Re: Too many logbooks during user registration, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Aug 7 18:39:37 2007
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]Stefan, we require registration with elog. We have quite a number of logbooks and when someone requests a login account AND elects
to register with all of the logbooks, the resulting URL is apparently too long for browsers to handle when the admins click on the link embedded in the
email notification. For example, FireFox (latest ver) appears to truncate the URL *after* submission (the correct URL is there before submission).
|
Re: Too many logbooks during user registration, posted by Steve Jones on Tue Sep 11 15:30:11 2007
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]Stefan, we require registration with elog. We have quite a number of logbooks and when someone requests a login
account AND elects to register with all of the logbooks, the resulting URL is apparently too long for browsers to handle when the admins click on the link
embedded in the email notification. For example, FireFox (latest ver) appears to truncate the URL *after* submission (the correct URL is there before |
Re: Too many logbooks during user registration, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Sep 11 21:25:11 2007
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]So the list is shown to the one requesting the registration? Would it be possible to have an option that, when selected, simply did
not list any logbooks? I can see a customer becoming confused if they did not see their logbook listed. Just turn off the selection completely. Otherwise,
this will work but I fear will generate more questions as in "Why isn't logbook <blah> listed?"[/quote]
|
Add date and time stamp to file upload, posted by Fergus Lynch on Thu Oct 4 12:03:30 2007
|
Hi,
Been using ELOG for a couple of years now and I am very impressed with its functionality.
|
Re: Add date and time stamp to file upload, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Oct 4 17:19:56 2007
|
[quote="Fergus Lynch"]I would like to request a new feature - add date and time stamp to file upload. We use ELOG (amongst other things!) as a change log
and this would really allow allow more accurate records to be kept. For instance we upload router config files (to record changes)and having the exact
upload date would be a big enhancement, especially when there are a lot of attachments.[/quote]
|