ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66520
|
Tue Aug 25 21:08:51 2009 |
| Arno Teunisse | A.teeling3@chello.nl | Question | Windows | 2.7.7-2246 | fckeditor update | Hello
Just a few fckeditor related questions. How do elog versions and fckeditor versions relate. ?
Can I just drop another version of the fckeditor over an other version? What things should I consider when doing so ?
thanks for you're time.
|
66519
|
Mon Aug 24 21:47:14 2009 |
| Allen | bastss@rit.edu | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.7-2246 | Fix text prevents user from editing text during creation, instead of just edit | When we set Fix text = 1, according to the syntax, this should prevent users from modifying the text field during an edit, but it looks like it is blocking access at both time of edit and creation, meaning you can never add anything to it. Is that the intended functionality? |
66518
|
Wed Aug 19 11:54:52 2009 |
| Johannes Liegl | Johannes.Liegl@gefanuc.com | Question | All | 2.7.5 | Re: Multiple keyword search |
Yoichi Aso wrote: | Hi,
I have a question regarding how to perform a multiple-keyword search.
For example, when I want to find entries which contain two keywords "abc" and "def" in the body text but in an unknown order,
one way I came up with was to use a regular expression like this.
(abc|def).*(abc|def)
But this will also match entries containing two "abc" or two "def".
The following one will eliminate this problem.
(abc.*def)|(def.*abc)
But when I use more than two keywords, this type of regular expressions becomes very long (because I have to list all the permutations of the keywords) and it may not fit in the search text field (there seems to be a limit on the length of the search text).
Is there any way to allow multiple-keyword search easily ?
It would be nice if I can just enter two or more keywords separated by white spaces and elog finds entries containing all the keywords.
Thanks,
Yoichi |
Dear Yoichi,
well we are facing the same problem and I would like to ask you if you have been able finding another method searching for keywords in documents?
I am looking forward to getting feedback. Thank you very much for your help in advance.
Best Regards
Johannes Liegl |
66517
|
Wed Aug 19 11:49:37 2009 |
| Johannes Liegl | Johannes.Liegl@gefanuc.com | Request | Linux | Windows | 2.7.2-2012 | multiple keyword search - regular expression | Dear Sirs,
searching for keywords regular expression becomes very long. Are there any other type easy multiple keyword search supported. For example a keyword search like keyword1 & keyword2 results in different output than a keyword search like keyword2 & keyword1. A simple keyword search like "keyword1 & keyword2 and keyword2 &keyword1 should find all documents in a database containing both keywords resulting in the same output.
Thank you very much for you help in advance.
Best Regards
Johannes Liegl
|
66516
|
Wed Aug 12 14:40:52 2009 |
| Steve Williamson | StephenWilliamson@Barnsley.gov.uk | Question | Windows | 2.6.5 | Re: Logbook Parser |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Steve Williamson wrote: |
excuse my butting in ... I've found the exports useful in the past - however, is is possible to run the export from a script in order to produce reports? Utilities like wget won't work as the export process doesn't return the data as html.
|
That's not true. wget does work. Try that one:
wget --no-check-certificate -O export.csv https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/linux+demo/?mode=CSV1
actaully wget doesn't care if the return is HTML or a GIF image or anything else, it just saves it into the output file.
|
you're right, of course, on all counts!
when I was testing wget/elog to try to automate an extract I was getting a lot of stuff like:
/Change_Log/587">Software Only</a></td><td class="92^M^H<88>^\ÿ^Y"ÿ"><a href="../Change_Log/587">23416</a></td><td class="92^M^H<88>^\ÿ^Y"Ã<a href="../Change_Log/587">New</a></td><td class="92^M^H<88>^\ÿ^Y"ÿ"><a href="../Change_Log/587">Awaited</a></td>
but I must have been getting something wrong, using your command line as an example it works perfectly! Thanks again for elog!! |
66515
|
Tue Aug 11 17:46:33 2009 |
| Dennis Seitz | dseitz@berkeley.edu | Comment | Linux | 2.7.7-2251 | Re: Comment on: Alphabetize Quick Option filter | Yes, many thanks, Stefan, from me, too! It's really great that you respond so quickly to requests and suggestions.
And thanks to David for the fine tuning, great suggestion.
Dennis
> Thanks Stefan! Works great.
>
> > Ok, that makes sense, so I changed it to
> >
> > Sort Attribute Options Status = 1
> >
> > as you suggested.
> >
> > > (For some reason I could not add this in Dennis's thread.)
> > >
> > > I like this new feature, BUT
> > >
> > > I happen to have two Options: Options System, and Options Status.
> > >
> > > System are a very few items, whereas Status has a long list, which, like Dennis's example, can be added to.
> > > Keeping the latter in alpha order is great, but it's a shame that the cost is that Options System are also
> > > sorted alphabetically, whereas it has a natural order which it would be preferable to keep - for example (and
> > > this is made up)
> > >
> > > Options System: 3.1, NT, 2000, XP, Vista
> > >
> > > where the natural order here is chronological.
> > >
> > > Perhaps the configuration file option could be more specific, for example
> > >
> > > Sort attribute Options Status = 1
> > >
> > > which would then NOT sort Options System. If both are needed to be sorted, both should be specified, or back to
> > > the original syntax which defaults to sort *all* Options. |
66514
|
Tue Aug 11 16:25:28 2009 |
| Alan Grant | netman311@mts.net | Question | Windows | 2.6.5 | Re: Logbook Parser |
Steve Williamson wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Alan Grant wrote: |
We are exploring whether it's possible/feasible to import ELog logbooks into a another database for special purposes (plotting/statisical, etc). Target database is TBD (perhaps Access).
Does anyone have or know of a logbook parser program? From cut/pasting into, for example, Excel, it does appear that the data fields are already line-feed delimited so offhand it would seem possible to parse if one really wanted to pursue it.
Regards,
- Alan
|
You can export to CSV (comma-separated-values) if you go to "Find" and then click on "Export: CSV". These fiels you ran read right into Excel or other spreadsheet programs for further analysis.
|
excuse my butting in ... I've found the exports useful in the past - however, is is possible to run the export from a script in order to produce reports? Utilities like wget won't work as the export process doesn't return the data as html.
regards
Steve
|
Steve, just a word of thanks for "butting in" ... my next thought was how could I schedule an export to feed the other database so it wouldn't have to be done manually each day. Your question took care of that for me! :)
Good community. Thanks. |
66513
|
Tue Aug 11 13:25:48 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.5 | Re: Logbook Parser |
Steve Williamson wrote: |
excuse my butting in ... I've found the exports useful in the past - however, is is possible to run the export from a script in order to produce reports? Utilities like wget won't work as the export process doesn't return the data as html.
|
That's not true. wget does work. Try that one:
wget --no-check-certificate -O export.csv https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/linux+demo/?mode=CSV1
actaully wget doesn't care if the return is HTML or a GIF image or anything else, it just saves it into the output file. |
|