Number of conditional attributes, posted by Richard Stamper on Wed Jul 4 13:58:23 2012
|
Is there a limit on the number of conditions that can be simultaneously active in a log? When I activate more than 10 conditions I start to see
side effects with other conditions being deactivated. I think this is due to the hard-coded array size of 10 for clist in the match_param function
in elogd.c. If so, could this limit be increased? |
Re: Number of conditional attributes, posted by Richard Stamper on Fri Jul 13 17:09:58 2012
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: ELOG 3.0 plus and MS Windows issues., posted by Richard Stamper on Fri Aug 7 16:13:09 2015
|
William
Wong wrote:
Thank you for recompiling ELOG. Unfortunately, there is no change |
|
Compiling for Windows, posted by Richard Stamper on Wed Aug 19 17:08:56 2015
|
I am interested in using LDAP authentication for elogd on Windows for which it looks like I need to compile from source, enabling LDAP in the make file.
Does anyone have advice on build environments for Windows in which they have had success making elog? Free ones preferably, such as
Cygwin. |
Re: FCKEditor not working correctly on a Windows server., posted by Richard Stamper on Tue Oct 13 12:39:14 2015 
|
If you are using IE as your browser, the problem may be with that rather than the server. By default IE 11 display intranet sites in a "Compatibility
mode" which breaks the FCKEditor in Elog version 3. Fortunately this mode can be disabled, which is what I have had to advise users here
to do. |
|
HTML in attribute values, posted by Richard Stamper on Tue Aug 22 14:19:43 2017
|
When one has "Allow HTML = 1" to permit HTML in attribute values, is it only a subset of HTML that is rendered?
I find that <br> and <a href="..."> tags are properly rendered, for example, but lists with <ol> and <ul> are
not. |
|
Re: HTML in attribute values, posted by Richard Stamper on Tue Aug 22 14:36:46 2017
|
Isn't that list in the message text rather than as an attribute value?
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
As you can see...
<UL> is possible
|
Re: HTML in attribute values, posted by Richard Stamper on Tue Aug 22 14:58:09 2017
|
Exactly the information I was after - thanks! I'll simulate fancier markup as necessary.
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
Sorry, I misread your question. Only following HTML tags are allowed |