Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 426 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Versiondown Subject
  66795   Fri Apr 23 08:32:10 2010 Reply Diogo Alvesdiogomiguelalves@gmail.comQuestionLinux2.7.7Re: Recursively open a new attribute of the same type

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Diogo Alves wrote:

Hi,

I have a logbook which, among other things, contains these attributes:

Options Ingredient = Egg, Oil

Options Quantity = 2, 0.1L

Now, I would like to, every time I select an ingredient and respective quantity, that another Ingredient and Quantity field opens up for me to procede addind them.

I've searched in the documentation and found nothing related to this. Maybe I missed it. Is it possible to do this?

Also, is there a way to display 2 attributes in the same row? Messing with CSS is probably the only answer ... correct?

Recursive attributes are not possible. All you can do is to define a certain number (like Ingredient1, Ingredient2, Ingredient3) and use Conditional Attributes to show them using the "Show Attributes Edit = ..." option.

To display two attributes in the same row, use 

Format <attribute> = 1

for the second attribute.

 

 Ok, thank you for your answer.

 

I guess my next question is whether it is possible to have, for example, 2 attributes:

Options Ingredient1 = 

Options Ingredient2 = 

Extendable options = Ingredients1, Ingredients2

sharing the exact same possible list of values.

 

Thanks agin.

  66796   Fri Apr 23 08:33:53 2010 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.7.7Re: Recursively open a new attribute of the same type

Diogo Alves wrote:

I guess my next question is whether it is possible to have, for example, 2 attributes:

Options Ingredient1 = 

Options Ingredient2 = 

Extendable options = Ingredients1, Ingredients2

sharing the exact same possible list of values.

If you add via an option to one Ingredient, you have to add it to the other as well. There is no automatic way to do that. 

  66835   Thu Jun 3 06:14:50 2010 Reply Dennis Seitzdseitz@berkeley.eduRequestAll2.7.7Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Dennis Seitz wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Dennis Seitz wrote:

 Hi Stefan,

I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.

We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.

I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?

Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!

Dennis

The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items

Options Type = C, D, A, B

they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like

Options Type = A, B, C, D

I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.

- Stefan 

 Yes, I have been manually sorting and resorting. We have extendable attributes and the list keeps growing so I have to resort every so often. I thought perhaps a simple alphanumeric sort as an option would be popular with most users so I thought I'd ask for it. It would really simplify things for me. Users who want to sort manually could do so by disabling the option. It never hurts to ask!

 

Ok, I implemented

Sort attribute options = 1

in the current SVN revision. 

 I've tried adding this statement to my cfg file but the attributes are still unsorted in the QuickFilter menus. Was this implemented in 2.7.7?

Shouldn't an existing configuration file entry like
Options Type = C, D, A, B
be sorted in the QuickFilter menu as A B C D?
  66839   Tue Jun 8 09:53:09 2010 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestAll2.7.7Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?

Dennis Seitz wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Dennis Seitz wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Dennis Seitz wrote:

 Hi Stefan,

I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.

We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.

I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?

Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!

Dennis

The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items

Options Type = C, D, A, B

they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like

Options Type = A, B, C, D

I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.

- Stefan 

 Yes, I have been manually sorting and resorting. We have extendable attributes and the list keeps growing so I have to resort every so often. I thought perhaps a simple alphanumeric sort as an option would be popular with most users so I thought I'd ask for it. It would really simplify things for me. Users who want to sort manually could do so by disabling the option. It never hurts to ask!

 

Ok, I implemented

Sort attribute options = 1

in the current SVN revision. 

 I've tried adding this statement to my cfg file but the attributes are still unsorted in the QuickFilter menus. Was this implemented in 2.7.7?

Shouldn't an existing configuration file entry like
Options Type = C, D, A, B
be sorted in the QuickFilter menu as A B C D?

You need revision 2252 or later. So you have to upgrade to 2.7.8. 

  66864   Wed Jul 28 17:01:06 2010 Reply Dennis Seitzdseitz@berkeley.eduRequestAll2.7.7Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Dennis Seitz wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Dennis Seitz wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Dennis Seitz wrote:

 Hi Stefan,

I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.

We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.

I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?

Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!

Dennis

The order of items in a Quick Filter menu is exactly as in the configuration file. Like if you have items

Options Type = C, D, A, B

they are shown like that in the quick filter menu. If you want to sort them, just do the sorting yourself in the configuration file like

Options Type = A, B, C, D

I have not implemented automatic sorting since some people want a different order, like some main topics at top. So by following the order from the configuration file, everybody can be satisfied just by chaning the order in the config file.

- Stefan 

 Yes, I have been manually sorting and resorting. We have extendable attributes and the list keeps growing so I have to resort every so often. I thought perhaps a simple alphanumeric sort as an option would be popular with most users so I thought I'd ask for it. It would really simplify things for me. Users who want to sort manually could do so by disabling the option. It never hurts to ask!

 

Ok, I implemented

Sort attribute options = 1

in the current SVN revision. 

 I've tried adding this statement to my cfg file but the attributes are still unsorted in the QuickFilter menus. Was this implemented in 2.7.7?

Shouldn't an existing configuration file entry like
Options Type = C, D, A, B
be sorted in the QuickFilter menu as A B C D?

You need revision 2252 or later. So you have to upgrade to 2.7.8. 

 We have upgraded to 2.7.8 but this still doesn't seem to work. The quick menus are still unsorted. Does it work for you?

  66866   Wed Jul 28 17:15:33 2010 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chRequestAll2.7.7Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?

Dennis Seitz wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Dennis Seitz wrote:

 

Ok, I implemented

Sort attribute options = 1

in the current SVN revision. 

 I've tried adding this statement to my cfg file but the attributes are still unsorted in the QuickFilter menus. Was this implemented in 2.7.7?

Shouldn't an existing configuration file entry like
Options Type = C, D, A, B
be sorted in the QuickFilter menu as A B C D?

You need revision 2252 or later. So you have to upgrade to 2.7.8. 

 We have upgraded to 2.7.8 but this still doesn't seem to work. The quick menus are still unsorted. Does it work for you?

Sorry, there was a typo, you need

Sort attribute options <attribute> = 1

where <attribute> is the name of the attribute to be sorted (in case you want some attributes sorted, but not all). 

  66870   Wed Jul 28 22:03:26 2010 Reply Dennis Seitzdseitz@berkeley.eduRequestAll2.7.7Re: alphabetize Quick Filter items?

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Dennis Seitz wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Dennis Seitz wrote:

 

Ok, I implemented

Sort attribute options = 1

in the current SVN revision. 

 I've tried adding this statement to my cfg file but the attributes are still unsorted in the QuickFilter menus. Was this implemented in 2.7.7?

Shouldn't an existing configuration file entry like
Options Type = C, D, A, B
be sorted in the QuickFilter menu as A B C D?

You need revision 2252 or later. So you have to upgrade to 2.7.8. 

 We have upgraded to 2.7.8 but this still doesn't seem to work. The quick menus are still unsorted. Does it work for you?

Sorry, there was a typo, you need

Sort attribute options <attribute> = 1

where <attribute> is the name of the attribute to be sorted (in case you want some attributes sorted, but not all). 

 That did the trick. That was a good idea, to give us the option of which attributes to sort, too. Thanks again for adding this feature!

  66455   Wed Jul 22 12:12:37 2009 Warning T. Ribbrockemgaron+elog@ribbrock.orgBug reportLinux2.7.6r2233Crashes when editing entries

For some odd reasons, we are experiencing frequent crashes of elogd over the past few days. It has been working fine so far, but more or less out of the blue it became rather unreliable. The current configuration is installed on two servers, one running 2.7.5.-r2174 on ClarkConnect 4 and one running 2.7.6-r2233 on Debian 4.0 - both show the same problem. Each of them has an "active" group with four logbooks and an "archive" group with three logbooks. In the "active" group, there are two logbooks that share the same index (using Subdir=...) and it looks like the crashes occur most of the time in these, though that's just a hunch so far. Also, most of the crashes seem to happen when submitting an entry that has been edited. Actually, submitting a modified entry has always been strange in our logbooks: When we hit submit, we get a pop-up window asking "Submit modified entry?". When choosing "OK", the entry that has been edited is duplicated. When choosing "Cancel", it is submitted correctly.

I've been running elogd like this (to get more info)

elogd -v > elog-2233-2.log 2>&1

The last entry I get in the log when elogd crashes is:

  Same index as logbook Machine Log
elogd: src/elogd.c:727: xfree: Assertion `*((unsigned int *) (temp - 4)) == 0xdeadc0de' failed.
Received unknown cookie "wikidb_mw__session"
Received unknown cookie "wikidb_mw__session"

I did actually make a few changes to the configuration before we noticed the crashes: I added one extra attribute and a few more conditionals.

 

Any additional information you need: Just let me know.

Regards,

Thomas

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6