ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
68094
|
Mon Aug 17 11:52:54 2015 |
| Philip Leung | philip.leung@cern.ch | Question | Linux | Windows | 3.1.1 | Re: Isolating search urls | Noted. Thank you for your time
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
No, no and again: no.
Philip Leung wrote: |
Would there be a simple way to redirect all URLs BUT the ones which trigger searches?
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
For any other filter you need "&<attribute>=", which of course requires the knowlede of all attributes. There is no other "standard" flag in the URL indicating a search.
Philip Leung wrote: |
This only applies to searches which specify that they are searching through the message text though. It would not work for things like quick filter
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Look for "&subtext=" in the URL
Philip Leung wrote: |
Is there no good way of differentiating search operations from others by URL?
Philip Leung wrote: |
Thanks for the quick response!
It's great to hear that multi-threading is in the works as this has been my main issue with an otherwise very nice piece of software. I do, however, feel like we should be able to get my slightly hacky approach to work to hold us over until you finish.
The idea is to run separate ELOG instances in read-only mode dedicated to these types of requests. I've managed to sync up the logbook indexation of each instance so now, unless there's some statefulness to ELOG that I'm forgetting about, I only need to make sure that requests are forwarded to the right instance.
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
I guess the underlying problem is the long time these requests take and block other users.
I have pretty high on my todo list to convert ELOG into a multi-threaded server which would fix this completely. So if you are patient enough (=months) you might get what you want.
Philip Leung wrote: |
Hello all,
I am in need of isolating GET-requests referring to long-running, read-only elog functions such as search/filter/sort in our Apache proxy and redirecting them elsewhere. There does not, however, appear to be any easy way of reliably isolating these functions (with the exception of sort) by only looking at the URL.
Does anybody have any suggestions?
Regards,
Philip
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67304
|
Sun Jul 29 00:59:51 2012 |
| Phil Rubin | prubin@gmu.edu | Question | Linux | latest | ssh tunneling with elog running under Apache | In a configuration with elog running (8080) under Apache (80) [as explained in admin guide], what is the syntax for tunnelling in with ssh, of both the ssh command and the browser locator? |
67305
|
Sun Jul 29 15:43:20 2012 |
| Phil Rubin | prubin@gmu.edu | Question | Linux | latest | Re: ssh tunneling with elog running under Apache |
Phil Rubin wrote: |
In a configuration with elog running (8080) under Apache (80) [as explained in admin guide], what is the syntax for tunnelling in with ssh, of both the ssh command and the browser locator?
|
Maybe some more information will help with the question. Here's the results of my playing around with URL = /host.domain/subdir in elog.cfg. Commented out, I can access locally with http://localhost:8080 and tunnelled (1234:host.domain:8080) with http://localhost:1234, with and without Apache (i.e., Apache is bypassed?). URL = /host.domain/elog in elog.cfg works locally with browser locator localhost:8080 (of course), localhost/elog, and host.domain/elog, but the tunnel directly to 8080 no longer works, nor does http://localhost:4321/elog (even though this ends up showing the same URL on the remote browser as on the local browser) (4321:host.domain:80). http://localhost:4321 brings up the Apache window. Every other URL assignment I tried failed both locally and remotely, so, I assume the ssh tunnel directive is wrong, or the browser locator, or maybe still URL = . Anyway, my question is, what am I doing wrong? |
68100
|
Mon Aug 24 20:40:14 2015 |
| Phil Rubin | rubinp@cern.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Send e-mail based on a hierarchy of attributes? | Is there a way to distribute e-mail based on the consideration of several attributes and values? A simple example: attributes type and category have several different values, say, routine and problem for type and hardware and software for category, but one would only like messages sent when there's a problem to different sets of hardware or software types. Thus:
Email
type routine category hardware = no message
category software = no message
type problem category hardware = a@bcd.efg, h@ijk.lmn
category software = 1@opq.rst, 2@uvw.xyz |
68280
|
Fri Mar 11 17:19:02 2016 |
| Phil Rubin | rubinp@cern.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | Installation: Failed Dependencies | Is there anything I can do about this?
kernel: 2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64
ldd (GNU libc) 2.12
/lib64/libc.so.6
/usr/lib64/libssl.so.10
rpm -i elog-latest.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libc.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libssl.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386 |
68281
|
Fri Mar 11 17:29:47 2016 |
| Phil Rubin | rubinp@cern.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | Installation: Failed Dependencies | Is there anything I can do about this?
kernel: 2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64
ldd (GNU libc) 2.12
/lib64/libc.so.6
/usr/lib64/libssl.so.10
rpm -i elog-latest.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libc.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libssl.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386 |
68282
|
Fri Mar 11 18:59:30 2016 |
| Phil Rubin | rubinp@cern.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: Installation: Failed Dependencies | I attempted instead to build from the tar ball, and, except for a "fatal" git error, make built elogd, elog, and elconv. I put the first in /usr/local/sbin, and the latter two in /usr/local/bin, and then restarted elogd, but this didn't work:
Service Temporarily Unavailable
The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.
So, I backed these out and restored the previous executables, and access to the elog was restored, and the elogd.cfg accessed is the original one, but all logbooks are empty and requiring authentication. The logbook directories still contain all the old entries, so I'm not sure what has happened.
Thanks for your advice.
Phil
Phil Rubin wrote: |
Is there anything I can do about this?
kernel: 2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64
ldd (GNU libc) 2.12
/lib64/libc.so.6
/usr/lib64/libssl.so.10
rpm -i elog-latest.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libc.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libssl.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
|
|
68283
|
Fri Mar 11 19:24:11 2016 |
| Phil Rubin | rubinp@cern.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.1 | Re: Installation: Failed Dependencies | OK. I found the source of the logbook problem in an exchange from May 2015, so no need to answer this one.
But I would like to be able to upgrade to 3.x from 2.9, so any help with this will be much appreciated.
Phil
Phil Rubin wrote: |
I attempted instead to build from the tar ball, and, except for a "fatal" git error, make built elogd, elog, and elconv. I put the first in /usr/local/sbin, and the latter two in /usr/local/bin, and then restarted elogd, but this didn't work:
Service Temporarily Unavailable
The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.
So, I backed these out and restored the previous executables, and access to the elog was restored, and the elogd.cfg accessed is the original one, but all logbooks are empty and requiring authentication. The logbook directories still contain all the old entries, so I'm not sure what has happened.
Thanks for your advice.
Phil
Phil Rubin wrote: |
Is there anything I can do about this?
kernel: 2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64
ldd (GNU libc) 2.12
/lib64/libc.so.6
/usr/lib64/libssl.so.10
rpm -i elog-latest.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libc.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
libssl.so.6 is needed by elog-3.1.1-1.i386
|
|
|
|