| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
66593
|
Tue Nov 10 14:56:07 2009 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.6-2236 | Re: Elog & SSL Export to CSV , Problem |
| Chuck Brost wrote: |
|
Stefan, would it be possible to make the following change so that the document is not cached and at the same time it is possible to save it.
The change would entail replacing the "Pragma: no-cache" directive with an "Expires: " <HTTP-date> where <HTTP-date> is the same as Date header value. Please see section 14.21 of http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html
Hopefully there are no other side effects to this change.
|
ok, so I removed the "Pragma: no-cache". With IE it looks fine now, and if I repeat it two times it always gets is from elog and not from the cache due to the "Expires:" statement. The "no-cache" came from old days when some browsers did not yet support the "Expires" tag. I hope that this is better now, so let's see when we get the first complaints. The modification is in SVN revision 2265. |
|
66622
|
Wed Nov 18 13:51:55 2009 |
| soren poulsen | soren.poulsen@cern.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.6-2236 | Re: Re: Elog & SSL Export to CSV , Problem |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| Chuck Brost wrote: |
|
Stefan, would it be possible to make the following change so that the document is not cached and at the same time it is possible to save it.
The change would entail replacing the "Pragma: no-cache" directive with an "Expires: " <HTTP-date> where <HTTP-date> is the same as Date header value. Please see section 14.21 of http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html
Hopefully there are no other side effects to this change.
|
ok, so I removed the "Pragma: no-cache". With IE it looks fine now, and if I repeat it two times it always gets is from elog and not from the cache due to the "Expires:" statement. The "no-cache" came from old days when some browsers did not yet support the "Expires" tag. I hope that this is better now, so let's see when we get the first complaints. The modification is in SVN revision 2265.
|
This seems to work fine. |
|
66452
|
Tue Jul 21 22:29:17 2009 |
 | kyle carpenter | kyle.carpenter@atmosenergy.com | Question | Windows | 2.7.6-2230 | Reply not working correct |
Hi,
I love this software. I am not a programmer but have learned alot about the program.
I have 2 questions.
1. when i do a reply it will bring the original qutes with it but i have the option to change what had been entered. once i do the reply and reply to the reply i can not change the first reply but can change the second reply. This just started last week and i am not sure what has changed. i even uninstalled and reinstalled. If I try to just the HTML i tcomes up with code? If I do elcode seems to do ok just not able to stop the editing of the the last reply. Plain seems to do the same as ELcode.
2. I have also had trouble with E-Log not starting on my XP machines. Any ideas?
Thanks for sharing such a powerful program it is sweet.
Kyle |
|
66453
|
Wed Jul 22 08:03:28 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.6-2230 | Re: Reply not working correct |
| kyle carpenter wrote: |
|
Hi,
I love this software. I am not a programmer but have learned alot about the program.
I have 2 questions. #### This is my modification ####
1. when i do a reply it will bring the original qutes with it but i have the option to change what had been entered. once i do the reply and reply to the reply i can not change the first reply but can change the second reply. This just started last week and i am not sure what has changed. i even uninstalled and reinstalled. If I try to just the HTML i tcomes up with code? If I do elcode seems to do ok just not able to stop the editing of the the last reply. Plain seems to do the same as ELcode.
2. I have also had trouble with E-Log not starting on my XP machines. Any ideas?
Thanks for sharing such a powerful program it is sweet.
Kyle
|
Sorry but I don't get your point. See I modified your original entry above. Now I will submit this entry, and do another reply. |
|
66454
|
Wed Jul 22 08:05:12 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.6-2230 | Re: Reply not working correct |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
| kyle carpenter wrote: |
|
Hi,
I love this software. I am not a programmer but have learned alot about the program.
I have 2 questions. #### This is my modification #### **** This is my second modification ****
1. when i do a reply it will bring the original qutes with it but i have the option to change what had been entered. once i do the reply and reply to the reply i can not change the first reply but can change the second reply. This just started last week and i am not sure what has changed. i even uninstalled and reinstalled. If I try to just the HTML i tcomes up with code? If I do elcode seems to do ok just not able to stop the editing of the the last reply. Plain seems to do the same as ELcode.
2. I have also had trouble with E-Log not starting on my XP machines. Any ideas?
Thanks for sharing such a powerful program it is sweet.
Kyle
|
Sorry but I don't get your point. See I modified your original entry above. Now I will submit this entry, and do another reply. **** And I can modify this ****
|
So this is my second reply. I can edit both your original entry and my first reply.
Your point 2) is too unspecific. I need more information there. You could run the elogd daemon interactively and check if there is any error output in the console window. |
|
66886
|
Thu Sep 2 10:30:14 2010 |
 | lance | lance1.hayward@yahoo.com | Question | Windows | 2.7.6-2230 | SQL Database |
We have been running elog for a few years now and its solid. The only thing is we are getting to 140k entries over a few books and its starting to slow down whist searching. My questions is can we go to an SQL type database rather than a flat file? Is it worth it? Is anyone running this type of configuration? |
|
66901
|
Wed Sep 15 00:21:10 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.6-2230 | Re: SQL Database |
| lance wrote: |
|
We have been running elog for a few years now and its solid. The only thing is we are getting to 140k entries over a few books and its starting to slow down whist searching. My questions is can we go to an SQL type database rather than a flat file? Is it worth it? Is anyone running this type of configuration?
|
Running through a SQL database requires a major rework of the software. I'm planning this in the long run, but not for this year. I'm also not sure how much this would buy you. If you do a full-text search on 140k entries in a SQL database (not index search), this might also take some time.
But what you can do is to "archive" part of your logbooks. Since the files are named YYMMDDa.log, you can move all 09XXXXXa.log files into a separate "archive" which you then do not include in your search. |
|
66915
|
Thu Sep 23 17:22:43 2010 |
| Bill Pier | bpier@clove.org | Question | Windows | 2.7.6-2230 | Re: SQL Database |
|
What about using something like MySQLfs to get a db backend transparently to ELOG? I use ENCFS, (a FUSE backend), currently to achieve encrypted logbooks and it works fine -- ELOG never knows anything other than reading and writing to logbook files. From what I've read, the MySQLfs backend would work the same, and you likely would gain some of the caching benefits of MySQL, which might help with your read/search times, given the memory requirements of the database of course.
Bill
lance wrote:
|
|
We have been running elog for a few years now and its solid. The only thing is we are getting to 140k entries over a few books and its starting to slow down whist searching. My questions is can we go to an SQL type database rather than a flat file? Is it worth it? Is anyone running this type of configuration?
|
|