ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66292
|
Thu Apr 9 10:52:29 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | Linux | Other | V2.7.5-213 | Re: conditional attributes | > I'm (ab)using elog as a database and would like to use conditional attributes, like:
>
> Attributes = PC Name, Operating System, Version, Distribution
> Options Operating System = Linux{1}, Windows{2}
> {1} Show Attributes Edit = Operating System, Distribution, PC Name
> {2} Show Attributes Edit = Operating System, PC Name, Version
>
> Problem is that there are several conditions and the list of attributes is rather long. Also, since it's a
> rather dynamic environment I have to make new attributes all the time, and adding them to all "show attributes"
> lists is not only tedious, but bound to cause errors as well.
>
>
> So...
>
> I was thinking, would it be an idea to make the list of attributes to be shown or hidden on a per attribute base.
>
>
>
> Like:
>
> Attributes = PC Name, Operating System, Version, Distribution
>
> # hide specific attributes
> Hide attributes = Distribution, PC Name
>
> # or configure which fields should be shown allways
> Show Attributes = Operating System, Version
>
> # add attributes based on OS
> Options Operating System = Linux{1}, Windows{2}
> {1} Show Attribute Edit = Distribution
> {2} Show Attribute Edit = PC Name
>
> (just thinking out loud here).
Sure such a think can be implemented, but I have no time right now to do so. I will put it on the wish list. |
66291
|
Thu Apr 9 10:39:34 2009 |
| W.Koster | W.Koster@rug.nl | Request | Linux | Other | V2.7.5-213 | conditional attributes | I'm (ab)using elog as a database and would like to use conditional attributes, like:
Attributes = PC Name, Operating System, Version, Distribution
Options Operating System = Linux{1}, Windows{2}
{1} Show Attributes Edit = Operating System, Distribution, PC Name
{2} Show Attributes Edit = Operating System, PC Name, Version
Problem is that there are several conditions and the list of attributes is rather long. Also, since it's a
rather dynamic environment I have to make new attributes all the time, and adding them to all "show attributes"
lists is not only tedious, but bound to cause errors as well.
So...
I was thinking, would it be an idea to make the list of attributes to be shown or hidden on a per attribute base.
Like:
Attributes = PC Name, Operating System, Version, Distribution
# hide specific attributes
Hide attributes = Distribution, PC Name
# or configure which fields should be shown allways
Show Attributes = Operating System, Version
# add attributes based on OS
Options Operating System = Linux{1}, Windows{2}
{1} Show Attribute Edit = Distribution
{2} Show Attribute Edit = PC Name
(just thinking out loud here). |
66290
|
Thu Apr 9 09:54:39 2009 |
| W.Koster | W.Koster@rug.nl | Question | All | 2.7.5-2168 | Re: How to configure eLog to send an e-mail notification when new logbook entry time is reached? |
Tero Suominen wrote: |
Hi! Thanks for the quick response. Do you have any suggestions on which calendar applications I should start looking for for this purpose?
Thanks,
Tero
|
You could write a shell script, run it through cron and send mail from that. (even in windows I assume)
|
66289
|
Wed Apr 8 12:30:35 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.7.5-218 | Re: is it posible to configure text message area contain two sections |
Joseph Le wrote: |
Hi,
I try to configure the elog as servers log book. I need to devide the text entry area by 2 section: 1 for issue so I can put in detail what is the issue of my servers. the other section below the 1st one for solution. is it posible to do so?
Joseph.
|
The easiest is to put a horizontal line into the entry ...
...like this one. This can even be done via "Preset text =" so it comes by default on a new entry. |
66288
|
Wed Apr 8 12:25:07 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | All | 2.6.2 | Re: Specifying the size of am image attachment |
Val Schmidt wrote: |
I'm curious, is it possible to specify (perhaps by default) the rendered size of an attached image. For example, I'd like all images uploaded to be scaled to 100% of the browser window size so a large image is not most off the screen. What I want is to specify the width="100" attribute of the <img /> tag, but it's not clear 1) how do to this for an attachment and 2) if it might be possible to do this in the config file for all img attachments.
|
When you use the ImageMagick package, attached images are scaled to a predefined size using the option "Thumbnail size = ...". See the documentation for that option for details. |
66287
|
Mon Apr 6 20:46:42 2009 |
| Val Schmidt | vschmidt@ldeo.columbia.edu | Question | All | 2.6.2 | Specifying the size of am image attachment | Hello,
I'm curious, is it possible to specify (perhaps by default) the rendered size of an attached image. For example, I'd like all images uploaded to be scaled to 100% of the browser window size so a large image is not most off the screen. What I want is to specify the width="100" attribute of the <img /> tag, but it's not clear 1) how do to this for an attachment and 2) if it might be possible to do this in the config file for all img attachments.
Thanks,
Val |
66286
|
Wed Apr 1 18:03:44 2009 |
| Joseph Le | joseph.p.le@nasa.gov | Question | Windows | 2.7.5-218 | is it posible to configure text message area contain two sections | Hi,
I try to configure the elog as servers log book. I need to devide the text entry area by 2 section: 1 for issue so I can put in detail what is the issue of my servers. the other section below the 1st one for solution. is it posible to do so?
Joseph. |
66285
|
Wed Apr 1 18:03:22 2009 |
| Joseph Le | joseph.p.le@nasa.gov | Question | Windows | 2.7.5-218 | is it posible to configure text message area contain two sections | Hi,
I try to configure the elog as servers log book. I need to devide the text entry area by 2 section: 1 for issue so I can put in detail what is the issue of my servers. the other section below the 1st one for solution. is it posible to do so?
Joseph. |
|