Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 468 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  66075   Mon Nov 24 17:53:23 2008 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.7.5Re: Special characters in attribute names

Thanks to your detailed description I could reproduce and fix the problem. Please download SVN revision #2144 and give it a try.

  66074   Mon Nov 24 13:49:56 2008 Reply Steve WilliamsonStephenWilliamson@Barnsley.gov.ukBug reportLinux2.7.5Re: Special characters in attribute names

Stefan Ritt wrote:

 

Steve Williamson wrote:

Hi

Thanks for elog - it's a brilliant piece of software.  I'd looked all over for open source software to log/manage change requests before discovering elog; it's so flexible that I've been able to do everything I need with it.

However, I think that I've just discovered my first undocumented 'feature'.  Attribute names containing punctuation characters (e.g. / and :) cause "Redirection limit for this URL exceeded" errors in Firefox 3.0.2 and corrupt the URL if they're used in a Quick Filter.  I often use '/' in attribute names for brevity, e.g. "Old/New Versions" but hadn't used one in a Quick Filter before.

 

Quick answer: Don't use '/' in attribute names ;-) but I guess you were kind of afraid to get this answer.

Somehow longer answer: I tried to reproduce your problem with following configuration:

[demo]
Attributes = Author, Type, Subject, Old/New
Options Old/New = Old, New
Quick filter = Type, Old/New

But I was not successful. Everything worked fine using ELOG V2.7.5-2137. Can you please check with the above configuration and tell me exactly when the redirection problem occurs? Is it during filtering on already on creating a new entry?

 

 Thanks for the advice!

I've just had time to set up a test for this using both empty and populated logbooks (which don't have Hardware/Software in every entry as the field was added recently) and newly created logbooks (which have consistent attributes) and saw the problem on . 

The control ("Hardware/Software") causing the problem has three options "Hardware Only", "Software Only" and "Both".  The problem happens every time you click on the "-- Hardware/Software --" (i.e. All) option in the Quick Filter after having previously selected one (or more) of the options as a filter.  This produces the error:

The page isn't redirecting properly
Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for this address in a way that will never complete.
*   This problem can sometimes be caused by disabling or refusing to accept cookies.

I ran elog with a trace (attached) which shows lots of:

select(1024, [5], NULL, NULL, {1, 0})   = 1 (in [5], left {1, 0})
recv(5, "GET /Change_Log/?Hardware%2FSoftware=_all_ HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: localhost:8080\r\nUser-"..., 100000, 0) = 619
stat64("/etc/localtime", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1323, ...}) = 0
time(NULL)                              = 1227528904
send(5, "HTTP/1.1 302 Found\r\nServer: ELOG HTTP 2.7.5-2130\r\nConnection: Keep-Alive\r\nKeep-A"..., 199, 0) = 199
send(5, "<html>redir</html>\r\n", 20, 0) = 20

messages after selecting "-- Hardware/Software --"

The only difference between today's test and last week's is that today the browser is on the local machine.

I also attach my (anonymised) elogd.cfg

Hope this helps

regards

Steve

 

  66073   Mon Nov 24 09:50:16 2008 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows2.7.5Re: Threaded emails

 

Niall Dooley wrote:

 

Stefan Ritt wrote:

 

Paul O'Shaughnessy wrote:

Can you email a thread of log entries. I think this would be a very useful function, which would enable the logger in effect to send an entire history of a particular issue to the interested parties.

 

 Well, kind of. If you notify yourself with elog entries, they are grouped in a thread in your email application. From there you can forward the thread to someone. Or you forward the link to one entry in the thread, and if the link is the opened, the interested parties see the whole link. Sending the whole thread inside elog is however not possible.

 

 Hi Stefan,

Your suggestion of emailing a link for a log entry with which any interested parties open the link are able to see the entire thread works. However, it does not display the additional text which may be added in the text box below the standard field entries. To view this additional text would require the email recipiant to log into the elog account. The only problem with this is the interested parties may not have the priviledges to log into the elog account. Thanks for your time.

 

 You could implemente guest read-only access to the logbook (like for this forum).

  66072   Sun Nov 23 15:19:50 2008 Reply Niall DooleyNiall_Dooley@inmarsat.comQuestionWindows2.7.5Re: Threaded emails

Stefan Ritt wrote:

 

Paul O'Shaughnessy wrote:

Can you email a thread of log entries. I think this would be a very useful function, which would enable the logger in effect to send an entire history of a particular issue to the interested parties.

 

 Well, kind of. If you notify yourself with elog entries, they are grouped in a thread in your email application. From there you can forward the thread to someone. Or you forward the link to one entry in the thread, and if the link is the opened, the interested parties see the whole link. Sending the whole thread inside elog is however not possible.

 Hi Stefan,

Your suggestion of emailing a link for a log entry with which any interested parties open the link are able to see the entire thread works. However, it does not display the additional text which may be added in the text box below the standard field entries. To view this additional text would require the email recipiant to log into the elog account. The only problem with this is the interested parties may not have the priviledges to log into the elog account. Thanks for your time.

  66071   Sat Nov 22 20:45:05 2008 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows2.7.5Re: Several drop down menu's for a field

 

Niall Dooley wrote:

Hi,

I was wondering if it is possible to have several drop down menus associated with a particular field. My problem is as follows, currently I have a particular field where its value is a name of a person obtained from a list of names from a drop down menu. However, I would like to be able to select on certain occasions more than one name from this same drop down list of names. 

The field name in question is "Call-out" as in the name of a person called out. I guess I could add another field say "Call-out 2" and have a drop down menu of names for this new field too but I would like to avoid this if possible. So I would like possiby to have two (or more) drop down menus side by side for this Call-out field which would each populate this one field with the names selected (if any) from each drop down menu. This way if only an a selection is made from the first drop down menu then it should work as it does currently but if an entry was also selected from the second drop down menu then both names should populate the field when the log is complete.

I hope I have been clear in my question/request? Many thanks in advance for any help or suggestions received.

 

Try

Moptions = name1, name2, ...

This gives you not a drop down list, but a series of check boxes, where you can select multiple persons simultaneously.

  66070   Sat Nov 22 13:08:59 2008 Question Niall DooleyNiall_Dooley@inmarsat.comQuestionWindows2.7.5Several drop down menu's for a field

Hi,

I was wondering if it is possible to have several drop down menus associated with a particular field. My problem is as follows, currently I have a particular field where its value is a name of a person obtained from a list of names from a drop down menu. However, I would like to be able to select on certain occasions more than one name from this same drop down list of names. 

The field name in question is "Call-out" as in the name of a person called out. I guess I could add another field say "Call-out 2" and have a drop down menu of names for this new field too but I would like to avoid this if possible. So I would like possiby to have two (or more) drop down menus side by side for this Call-out field which would each populate this one field with the names selected (if any) from each drop down menu. This way if only an a selection is made from the first drop down menu then it should work as it does currently but if an entry was also selected from the second drop down menu then both names should populate the field when the log is complete.

I hope I have been clear in my question/request? Many thanks in advance for any help or suggestions received.

  66069   Fri Nov 21 18:21:36 2008 Question Dennis Seitzdseitz@berkeley.eduQuestionAlllatestRe: Re: $entry time not readable by Subst, else not datetime type? - possible Preset bug?

Dennis Seitz wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Dennis Seitz wrote:
Do you mean '$entry time', or did you create a new parameter? (I don't see $entry date in the elogd.cfg reference)


Yes, of course I mean '$entry time', sorry for the misspelling.


Well, we really appreciate the way you keep adding features and making improvements. I thought you might have slipped a new one in!



FYI, I think there's a little bug in the datetime vs $date implementation.

Here's a section of my config file implementing a "Last Edit" field:

Type Last Edit = datetime
Preset Last Edit =$date
Locked Attributes = Last Edit
Subst on edit Last Edit = $date
Start page = ?rsort=Last Edit

I expected that "Preset Last Edit =$date" would set Last Edit to the current date when I create a new entry. In fact that leaves the field empty, or at least not in datetime format.

I found that using this instead works:
Preset Last Edit =$entry time

which seems contradictory since
Subst on edit Last Edit = $date
works fine.
  66068   Fri Nov 21 16:02:10 2008 Reply Niklasniklas@hoglund.pp.seBug reportLinux2.7.5 2142Re: Elogd crashes with: *** stack smashing detected ***

Niklas wrote:

Hi,

 

elogd sometimes crashes when there are large cookies. Or I'd guess it has something to do with the cookies, elogd crashed over and over again until I cleaned out cookies and authenticated sessions in firefox, then it stopped.

 

When I run "elogd -v" in gdb, and someone does:

 



GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: bba.eld.ki.sw.home.se:8080
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; sv-SE; rv:1.9.0.3) Gecko/2008092417 Firefox/3.0.3
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 300
Connection: keep-alive
Cookie: urem=0; TWIKISID=ecaa5a39e8446a27ec5a34bcbb9d4bcb; unm=erirone; upwd=c3w5MTg1; ipplanNoAuth=yes; SMSESSION=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


*** stack smashing detected ***: /root/elogd_2.7.5_2142 terminated
 


 

 


*** stack smashing detected ***: /root/elogd_2.7.5_2142 terminated

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
(gdb) bt
#0  0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1  0xb7dad875 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2  0xb7daf201 in abort () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#3  0xb7de4e5c in ?? () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#4  0x00000000 in ?? ()
(gdb)

 

 

 

 

 Stefan,

perhaps there should be something like the bold text below in elogd.c:

int process_http_request(const char *request, int i_conn)^M
...

   /* extract cookies */^M
   if ((p = strstr(request, "Cookie:")) != NULL) {^M
      p += 6;^M
      do {^M
         p++;^M
         while (*p && *p == ' ')^M
            p++;^M
         strlcpy(str, p, sizeof(str));^M
         for (i = 0; i < (int) strlen(str); i++)^M
            if (str[i] == '=' || str[i] == ';')^M
               break;^M
         if (str[i] == '=') {^M
            str[i] = 0;^M
            p += i + 1;^M
            for (i = 0; *p && *p != ';' && *p != '\r' && *p != '\n' && i < (int) sizeof(cookie); i++)
                      cookie[i] = *p++;

...

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6