Howto force users to supply an email address when registering?, posted by Johan Nyberg on Thu Oct 20 14:15:14 2005
|
Hi,
Today I noticed that a user had registered without supplying an email address. I am using Self Register = 3, which means I recieve an email from elogd |
Re: Howto force users to supply an email address when registering?, posted by Johan Nyberg on Sat Oct 22 00:21:03 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Johan Nyberg"]Is there a way to force the users to supply an email address when they register?[/quote]
I will happily implement such an email check if you supply me further information. Presume you enter an email address in the form user#domain.com (# instead |
Prefill attributes for new post, posted by Johan Forsberg on Tue Jan 12 11:35:55 2016
|
Hi all,
I have a use case for ELOG where I need to be able to "prefill" some attributes in the "cmd=new" form, based on the URL.
To illustrate, imagine a link that takes the user directly to the form for creating a new post, with the "Subsystem" attribute already |
|
Re: Prefill attributes for new post, posted by Johan Forsberg on Tue Jan 12 14:05:55 2016
|
Wow, than you both for the quick response! I agree it's quite a hidden gem, but the most important thing is that it works, thanks!
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
Put a "p" in front of the attribute, like "&pSubsystem=Vacuum". |
|
Monitoring a logbook for changes, posted by Johan Forsberg on Tue Jan 12 15:06:42 2016
|
Hi again!
I've another need that you probably already thought of :)
I'd like to be able to efficiently monitor a logbook for changes (new or edited posts) somehow. The most reasonable way I've found so |
|
Re: Monitoring a logbook for changes, posted by Johan Forsberg on Wed Jan 13 10:27:21 2016
|
Yeah, I found the RSS feed feature, but I could not get ETags/Last-Modified header fields which meant that I'd have to read and parse the entire
feed every time. Maybe I made a mistake and they do work, but if not, I think it would make sense to implement as it should save work for both the server
and the client. |
|
Re: Monitoring a logbook for changes, posted by Johan Forsberg on Wed Jan 13 10:29:54 2016
|
Yeah, I suppose something like that would be both faster and more efficient than polling ELOG itself. Fortunately the ELOG disk format looks easily parsed.
Thanks for the pointer!
Tamas |
|
Re: Monitoring a logbook for changes, posted by Johan Forsberg on Wed Jan 13 20:08:04 2016
|
Aha, that's interesting too! I'll have to look more carefully through the documentation... :)
Stefan
Ritt wrote:
You guys know that there is the possibility to execute an arbitrary |