Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 49 of 806  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Versiondown Subject
  69073   Wed Dec 4 10:37:32 2019 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinuxV3.1.3Re: Change column width in list mode?

You need

.listframe td:nth-child(3) {
   min-width: 250px;
}

/Stefan

David Wallis wrote:

In some of our logbooks, some columns are very narrow, which makes their content difficult to read. I have tried adding a custom css file like this:

listframe td:nth-child(3) {
   width: 250px;
}

But I find that the column width does not change. I have verified via element inspection that the width attribute is active on the correct column (td).

Am I doing someting wrong, or is this not possible?

 

  69075   Fri Dec 6 15:40:19 2019 Reply David Walliswallis@aps.anl.govQuestionLinuxV3.1.3Re: Change column width in list mode?

Awesome, thank you!

Stefan Ritt wrote:

You need

.listframe td:nth-child(3) {
   min-width: 250px;
}

/Stefan

David Wallis wrote:

In some of our logbooks, some columns are very narrow, which makes their content difficult to read. I have tried adding a custom css file like this:

listframe td:nth-child(3) {
   width: 250px;
}

But I find that the column width does not change. I have verified via element inspection that the width attribute is active on the correct column (td).

Am I doing someting wrong, or is this not possible?

 

 

  68539   Mon Jan 9 17:15:56 2017 Question Andreas Warburtonawarburt@physics.mcgill.caBug reportMac OSXV3.1.2-edc5e85elogd crashes during SSL Mirror operations involving attachments

My MacOS (10.12.2) elogd version V3.1.2 is a recent git commit (edc5e85), due to the fix to my earlier-described issue solved in the thread here: https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/68519.

I am trying to (re-)set up Mirror functionality with a linux server running the standard public (V3.1.2-bd75964).  I had initially updated the linux server so that it also had the latest git commit (edc5e85), but could then not even add new logbook entries that involved attachments to it.  I therefore rolled the linux server back to the standard public 3.1.2 version.

On the remote Mac, synchronizations usually look like they are going to work fine, with Mirror simulate = 1 switched on.  After I set Mirror simulate = 0, and if the server and remote logbook are already identical, I *occasionally* get the proper "All Entries Identical" synchronization result.  Unfortunately, this is very rare, and usually there is a failure whereby the remote (Mac) logbook decides that a significant fraction of its entries (usually sequential, from some seemingly random entry all the way up to the last entry) are missing on the linux server and need to be submitted back to the server from the remote Mac.

When the local and remote logbooks are not identical, and a record in need of synchronization contains an attachment, there is again destructive behaviour similar to that described above, except that the Mac elogd executable usually crashes.  (As in the case of the already-identical synchronizations described above, I only tested this after observing the correct expected behaviour first with Mirror simulate = 1.)

I'd be grateful for some help/suggestions.  My current testing suggests that my problems are likely not elog-content dependent.  (The logbook now undergoing synching has less than 10 entries in it.)

More generally, the issue of having things behave fine with Mirror simulate = 1, but then experiencing corruption/damage when switching to Mirror simulate = 0 seems serious to me.

Many thanks, Andreas

 
  68547   Fri Jan 13 08:27:15 2017 Entry Andreas Warburtonawarburt@physics.mcgill.caBug reportLinux | Mac OSXV3.1.2-edc5e85Re: elogd crashes during SSL Mirror operations involving attachments

The attached screenshot shows the behaviour after doing a synchronization (with Mirror simulate = 1) following first having ensured that the local (Mac) and remote (linux) ELOGs initially showed "All entries identical" when doing a simulated synchronization, and then having edited local entries 9707 and 9709 by uploading (different) attachments to them.

The fact that the synchronization is suggesting to renumber two different entry IDs to the same number looks like a bug.

Best regards,

Andreas W.

Andreas Warburton wrote:

My MacOS (10.12.2) elogd version V3.1.2 is a recent git commit (edc5e85), due to the fix to my earlier-described issue solved in the thread here: https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/68519.

I am trying to (re-)set up Mirror functionality with a linux server running the standard public (V3.1.2-bd75964).  I had initially updated the linux server so that it also had the latest git commit (edc5e85), but could then not even add new logbook entries that involved attachments to it.  I therefore rolled the linux server back to the standard public 3.1.2 version.

On the remote Mac, synchronizations usually look like they are going to work fine, with Mirror simulate = 1 switched on.  After I set Mirror simulate = 0, and if the server and remote logbook are already identical, I *occasionally* get the proper "All Entries Identical" synchronization result.  Unfortunately, this is very rare, and usually there is a failure whereby the remote (Mac) logbook decides that a significant fraction of its entries (usually sequential, from some seemingly random entry all the way up to the last entry) are missing on the linux server and need to be submitted back to the server from the remote Mac.

When the local and remote logbooks are not identical, and a record in need of synchronization contains an attachment, there is again destructive behaviour similar to that described above, except that the Mac elogd executable usually crashes.  (As in the case of the already-identical synchronizations described above, I only tested this after observing the correct expected behaviour first with Mirror simulate = 1.)

I'd be grateful for some help/suggestions.  My current testing suggests that my problems are likely not elog-content dependent.  (The logbook now undergoing synching has less than 10 entries in it.)

More generally, the issue of having things behave fine with Mirror simulate = 1, but then experiencing corruption/damage when switching to Mirror simulate = 0 seems serious to me.

Many thanks, Andreas

 

 

Attachment 1: Screen_Shot_2017-01-13_at_8.24.07_AM.png
Screen_Shot_2017-01-13_at_8.24.07_AM.png
  68548   Fri Jan 13 21:05:49 2017 Reply Andreas Warburtonawarburt@physics.mcgill.caBug reportLinux | Mac OSXV3.1.2-edc5e85Re: elogd crashes during SSL Mirror operations involving attachments

When I switch from SSL = 1 to SSL = 0 and I use http:// instead of https://, the ability to upload attachments to logbook entries returns.  With both Chrome and Safari browsers, with SSL = 1 the file upload hangs after only a small percentage of the file has been uploaded.  I ran the following openssl diagnostic on my elogd port.  Would anyone have advice on what might be causing such errors?

tapajo [/usr/local/elog/elog-latest] openssl s_client -connect elog.hep.xxx.xxx.xx:80xx -state -nbio | grep "^SSL"

SSL_connect:before/connect initialization

SSL_connect:SSLv2/v3 write client hello A

SSL_connect:error in SSLv2/v3 read server hello A

SSL_connect:unknown state

depth=0 C = EU, ST = SomeState, L = SomeCity, O = SomeOranization, OU = SomeOrganizationUnit, CN = localhost

verify error:num=18:self signed certificate

verify return:1

depth=0 C = EU, ST = SomeState, L = SomeCity, O = SomeOranization, OU = SomeOrganizationUnit, CN = localhost

verify return:1

SSL_connect:unknown state

SSL_connect:unknown state

SSL_connect:unknown state

SSL_connect:unknown state

SSL_connect:unknown state

SSL_connect:unknown state

SSL_connect:error in unknown state

SSL_connect:error in unknown state

SSL_connect:unknown state

SSL_connect:unknown state

SSL handshake has read 1733 bytes and written 871 bytes

SSL-Session:

SSL3 alert read:warning:close notify

SSL3 alert write:warning:close notify

Andreas Warburton wrote:

The attached screenshot shows the behaviour after doing a synchronization (with Mirror simulate = 1) following first having ensured that the local (Mac) and remote (linux) ELOGs initially showed "All entries identical" when doing a simulated synchronization, and then having edited local entries 9707 and 9709 by uploading (different) attachments to them.

The fact that the synchronization is suggesting to renumber two different entry IDs to the same number looks like a bug.

Best regards,

Andreas W.

Andreas Warburton wrote:

My MacOS (10.12.2) elogd version V3.1.2 is a recent git commit (edc5e85), due to the fix to my earlier-described issue solved in the thread here: https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/68519.

I am trying to (re-)set up Mirror functionality with a linux server running the standard public (V3.1.2-bd75964).  I had initially updated the linux server so that it also had the latest git commit (edc5e85), but could then not even add new logbook entries that involved attachments to it.  I therefore rolled the linux server back to the standard public 3.1.2 version.

On the remote Mac, synchronizations usually look like they are going to work fine, with Mirror simulate = 1 switched on.  After I set Mirror simulate = 0, and if the server and remote logbook are already identical, I *occasionally* get the proper "All Entries Identical" synchronization result.  Unfortunately, this is very rare, and usually there is a failure whereby the remote (Mac) logbook decides that a significant fraction of its entries (usually sequential, from some seemingly random entry all the way up to the last entry) are missing on the linux server and need to be submitted back to the server from the remote Mac.

When the local and remote logbooks are not identical, and a record in need of synchronization contains an attachment, there is again destructive behaviour similar to that described above, except that the Mac elogd executable usually crashes.  (As in the case of the already-identical synchronizations described above, I only tested this after observing the correct expected behaviour first with Mirror simulate = 1.)

I'd be grateful for some help/suggestions.  My current testing suggests that my problems are likely not elog-content dependent.  (The logbook now undergoing synching has less than 10 entries in it.)

More generally, the issue of having things behave fine with Mirror simulate = 1, but then experiencing corruption/damage when switching to Mirror simulate = 0 seems serious to me.

Many thanks, Andreas

 

 

 

  68724   Sat Jan 27 03:37:11 2018 Warning Peter Kpkravt@gmail.comBug reportLinuxV3.1.2-bd75964Entries disappear after editing

Dear elog community,

We have a problem with elog V3.1.2-bd75964.
Sometimes entries disappear from the list after editing.
I found them in the .log files with attributes

Locked by:
Draft:

But they are not in the list anymore!
The only solution by now is manually remove these two attributes from the file,
but this is terrible.

How can I fix this?

Thanks,
Peter.

 

  68725   Mon Jan 29 09:14:35 2018 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinuxV3.1.2-bd75964Re: Entries disappear after editing

Drafts are message which somebody started to edit, but did not complete, like leaving the page without saving. If you don't like this, you can set "save drafts = 0".

The locking has a similar background. If you have locking on (vis "Use lock = 1"), then one person can "lock" a message, and other then cannot edit the same message. If you don't want that, switch locking off.

Best,
Stefan

Peter K wrote:

Dear elog community,

We have a problem with elog V3.1.2-bd75964.
Sometimes entries disappear from the list after editing.
I found them in the .log files with attributes

Locked by:
Draft:

But they are not in the list anymore!
The only solution by now is manually remove these two attributes from the file,
but this is terrible.

How can I fix this?

Thanks,
Peter.

 

 

  68726   Tue Jan 30 14:26:24 2018 Reply Peter Kpkravt@gmail.comBug reportLinuxV3.1.2-bd75964Re: Entries disappear after editing

Thanks for fast response!

I LIKE locking and saving drafts.
The only problem is that the locked message disappeared from the list.
This does not happen every time one left the editor, but sometimes.
I can send you the problematic message as it was disappeared, before I deleted Locked by and Draft attributes.
I can't imagine why it is not shown in the list.

 

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Drafts are message which somebody started to edit, but did not complete, like leaving the page without saving. If you don't like this, you can set "save drafts = 0".

The locking has a similar background. If you have locking on (vis "Use lock = 1"), then one person can "lock" a message, and other then cannot edit the same message. If you don't want that, switch locking off.

Best,
Stefan

Peter K wrote:

Dear elog community,

We have a problem with elog V3.1.2-bd75964.
Sometimes entries disappear from the list after editing.
I found them in the .log files with attributes

Locked by:
Draft:

But they are not in the list anymore!
The only solution by now is manually remove these two attributes from the file,
but this is terrible.

How can I fix this?

Thanks,
Peter.

 

 

 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6