ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
69272
|
Wed Dec 2 22:45:16 2020 |
| Harry Martin | harrymartin772@gmail.com | Question | Linux | Windows | Mac OSX | All | Other | 3.1.3 | length of condition names | The documentation describing the use of conditionals uses a single character (letter or number) for names of conditions. I don't see any update/change to that rule anywhere in the docs.
I have been using multi-character condition names successfully. I find these are easier to use since they can be more descriptive of each condition. It works, but I am concerned I may be doing something that might not be supported going forward. (It is simple enough to change these, but I'd prefer to know if this practice is acceptable.)
Thank you, again, for this fine (and, may I add, fun?) tool. I'm having a good time with it! |
69273
|
Thu Dec 3 01:51:49 2020 |
| Harry Martin | harrymartin772@gmail.com | Question | Linux | Windows | 3.1.3 | Re: Options <...> vs ROptions <...> | Same problem here, in version 3.1.3. It would be very nice if this worked.
Wolfgang Bayer wrote: |
According to section "Syntax of elogd.cfg" of the "Administrator's Guide" Options <attribute> = <list> and ROptions <attribute> = <list> should be the same. But there is a litle difference, because choosing an entry of the Options-pull-down menu causes a reload of the entry mask while choosing a ROption-radio-button the entry mask is not reloaded. This causes a problem using conditional attributes. The condition is only paid attention to in case of Options but not in case of ROptions. In my case I would like to use ROption, as it is faster to set a radio button than to choose an item in a pull-down menu, but I can't as I have also to use conditional attributes. Is there any solution?
|
|
69274
|
Thu Dec 3 01:53:59 2020 |
| Harry Martin | harrymartin772@gmail.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.7.7-2246 | Re: Change / List Change doen't work anymore? |
Stefan Ritt wrote: | Yepp, the documentation was wrong. I fixed it.
Stefan |
Thank you. |
69279
|
Fri Dec 4 02:03:56 2020 |
| Harry Martin | harrymartin772@gmail.com | Question | Linux | Windows | Mac OSX | All | Other | 3.1.3 | Re: length of condition names | Could we update the doc for this?
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
You can easily use multi-character conditionals, up to 256 chars.
Harry Martin wrote: |
The documentation describing the use of conditionals uses a single character (letter or number) for names of conditions. I don't see any update/change to that rule anywhere in the docs.
I have been using multi-character condition names successfully. I find these are easier to use since they can be more descriptive of each condition. It works, but I am concerned I may be doing something that might not be supported going forward. (It is simple enough to change these, but I'd prefer to know if this practice is acceptable.)
Thank you, again, for this fine (and, may I add, fun?) tool. I'm having a good time with it!
|
|
|
69417
|
Sun Nov 21 23:20:15 2021 |
| Harry Martin | harrymartin772@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.2 | Body of new messages not getting saved when submitted | I've been using elog for a few years now. I've had the current setup working for me up until today.
If I create a new message (entry, whatever they are called), or if I attempt to update an existing message, only the header information is saved. The body (the part I can see in the editor) does not get saved.
Yesterday, I did do some updates on the server machine. Among them was an update to apache2, but I am not using apache2 (I can disable apache2, and elogd continues serving elog on client machines). Also updated were several python3 packages; I ran into a compatibility problem with python3 with a different package, so I wonder if that could have some impact for elog also. About 50 packages were updated altogether.
Here are the packages that were updated yesterday (in case this is of interest to solving the issue):
bind9-host:amd64 (1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9, 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u10)
ckeditor:amd64 (4.5.7+dfsg-2, 4.5.7+dfsg-2+deb9u1)
cron:amd64 (3.0pl1-128+deb9u1, 3.0pl1-128+deb9u2)
dnsutils:amd64 (1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9, 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u10)
firefox-esr:amd64 (78.14.0esr-1~deb9u1, 78.15.0esr-1~deb9u1)
libapache2-mod-php7.0:amd64 (7.0.33-0+deb9u11, 7.0.33-0+deb9u12)
libavcodec57:amd64 (7:3.2.15-0+deb9u4, 7:3.2.16-1+deb9u1)
libavfilter6:amd64 (7:3.2.15-0+deb9u4, 7:3.2.16-1+deb9u1)
libavformat57:amd64 (7:3.2.15-0+deb9u4, 7:3.2.16-1+deb9u1)
libavresample3:amd64 (7:3.2.15-0+deb9u4, 7:3.2.16-1+deb9u1)
libavutil55:amd64 (7:3.2.15-0+deb9u4, 7:3.2.16-1+deb9u1)
libbind9-140:amd64 (1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9, 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u10)
libcups2:amd64 (2.2.1-8+deb9u6, 2.2.1-8+deb9u7)
libcupsimage2:amd64 (2.2.1-8+deb9u6, 2.2.1-8+deb9u7)
libdns162:amd64 (1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9, 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u10)
libdns-export162:amd64 (1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9, 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u10)
libdw1:amd64 (0.168-1, 0.168-1+deb9u1)
libelf1:amd64 (0.168-1, 0.168-1+deb9u1)
libfaad2:amd64 (2.8.0~cvs20161113-1+deb9u2, 2.8.0~cvs20161113-1+deb9u3)
libicu57:amd64 (57.1-6+deb9u4, 57.1-6+deb9u5)
libisc160:amd64 (1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9, 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u10)
libisccc140:amd64 (1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9, 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u10)
libisccfg140:amd64 (1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9, 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u10)
libisc-export160:amd64 (1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9, 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u10)
libjbig2dec0:amd64 (0.13-4.1, 0.13-4.1+deb9u1)
liblwres141:amd64 (1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9, 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u10)
libnghttp2-14:amd64 (1.18.1-1+deb9u1, 1.18.1-1+deb9u2)
libntfs-3g871:amd64 (1:2016.2.22AR.1+dfsg-1+deb9u1, 1:2016.2.22AR.1+dfsg-1+deb9u2)
libopencv-core2.4v5:amd64 (2.4.9.1+dfsg1-2, 2.4.9.1+dfsg1-2+deb9u1)
libopencv-imgproc2.4v5:amd64 (2.4.9.1+dfsg1-2, 2.4.9.1+dfsg1-2+deb9u1)
libpostproc54:amd64 (7:3.2.15-0+deb9u4, 7:3.2.16-1+deb9u1)
libpython3.5:amd64 (3.5.3-1+deb9u4, 3.5.3-1+deb9u5)
libpython3.5-minimal:amd64 (3.5.3-1+deb9u4, 3.5.3-1+deb9u5)
libpython3.5-stdlib:amd64 (3.5.3-1+deb9u4, 3.5.3-1+deb9u5)
libruby2.3:amd64 (2.3.3-1+deb9u9, 2.3.3-1+deb9u10)
libsdl1.2debian:amd64 (1.2.15+dfsg1-4, 1.2.15+dfsg1-4+deb9u1)
libswresample2:amd64 (7:3.2.15-0+deb9u4, 7:3.2.16-1+deb9u1)
libswscale4:amd64 (7:3.2.15-0+deb9u4, 7:3.2.16-1+deb9u1)
ntfs-3g:amd64 (1:2016.2.22AR.1+dfsg-1+deb9u1, 1:2016.2.22AR.1+dfsg-1+deb9u2)
php7.0-cli:amd64 (7.0.33-0+deb9u11, 7.0.33-0+deb9u12)
php7.0-common:amd64 (7.0.33-0+deb9u11, 7.0.33-0+deb9u12)
php7.0-curl:amd64 (7.0.33-0+deb9u11, 7.0.33-0+deb9u12)
php7.0-intl:amd64 (7.0.33-0+deb9u11, 7.0.33-0+deb9u12)
php7.0-json:amd64 (7.0.33-0+deb9u11, 7.0.33-0+deb9u12)
php7.0-mbstring:amd64 (7.0.33-0+deb9u11, 7.0.33-0+deb9u12)
php7.0-opcache:amd64 (7.0.33-0+deb9u11, 7.0.33-0+deb9u12)
php7.0-readline:amd64 (7.0.33-0+deb9u11, 7.0.33-0+deb9u12)
php7.0-xml:amd64 (7.0.33-0+deb9u11, 7.0.33-0+deb9u12)
python3.5:amd64 (3.5.3-1+deb9u4, 3.5.3-1+deb9u5)
python3.5-minimal:amd64 (3.5.3-1+deb9u4, 3.5.3-1+deb9u5)
ruby2.3:amd64 (2.3.3-1+deb9u9, 2.3.3-1+deb9u10)
tzdata:amd64 (2021a-0+deb9u1, 2021a-0+deb9u2)
This is a devuan ascii server only for clients on a local area network. |
69419
|
Mon Nov 22 00:44:21 2021 |
| Harry Martin | harrymartin772@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.2 | Re: Body of new messages not getting saved when submitted | Thank you for your quick response, Sebastion. The new version of ckeditor is 4.5.7 -- is this version compatible with elog 3.1.2? It is possible that I am using an outdated elog or outdated ckeditor due to the fact that this server is a bit old; I am looking to upgrade this machine soon, but I have several other issues to resolve first.
Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
Hello Harry,
the elog server (elogd) is a standalone application written in C and contains a full webserver and logfile management system.
There are no other dependencies to apache or python.
You can use a webserver like apache or nginx in combination with elog to act as a proxy,
e.g. to handle the encryption part of the communication between your web browser and the elogd, but you don't need to.
Regarding the first part of your message:
The elog server worked normally; entries (including the text body) got saved correctly until the last update?
The only thing in your list of updates, I can think of making this problem could be the update of ckeditor as it is the text editor used by elog.
The other packages should not be related to elog... but I am not a package maintainer.
I compiled elog from source and it brings the necessary files with it.
Best wishes,
Sebastian
Harry Martin wrote: |
I've been using elog for a few years now. I've had the current setup working for me up until today.
If I create a new message (entry, whatever they are called), or if I attempt to update an existing message, only the header information is saved. The body (the part I can see in the editor) does not get saved.
Yesterday, I did do some updates on the server machine. Among them was an update to apache2, but I am not using apache2 (I can disable apache2, and elogd continues serving elog on client machines). Also updated were several python3 packages; I ran into a compatibility problem with python3 with a different package, so I wonder if that could have some impact for elog also. About 50 packages were updated altogether.
Here are the packages that were updated yesterday (in case this is of interest to solving the issue):
[...]
This is a devuan ascii server only for clients on a local area network.
|
|
|
69420
|
Mon Nov 22 19:28:28 2021 |
| Harry Martin | harrymartin772@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.2 | Re: Body of new messages not getting saved when submitted | (disregard my recent post here about missing package -- that wasn't the elog server!)
I can see that ckeditor was upgraded 11/19, which is would be prior to my recent attempts to use elog. It was apparently a security update, so I am not sure it is sensible to downgrade. OTOH, I am the only person here, and I have all sides carefully barracaded, so I don't think it would be much of an issue. But please disabuse me of my ignorance if need be.
Harry Martin wrote: |
Thank you for your quick response, Sebastion. The new version of ckeditor is 4.5.7 -- is this version compatible with elog 3.1.2? It is possible that I am using an outdated elog or outdated ckeditor due to the fact that this server is a bit old; I am looking to upgrade this machine soon, but I have several other issues to resolve first.
Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
Hello Harry,
the elog server (elogd) is a standalone application written in C and contains a full webserver and logfile management system.
There are no other dependencies to apache or python.
You can use a webserver like apache or nginx in combination with elog to act as a proxy,
e.g. to handle the encryption part of the communication between your web browser and the elogd, but you don't need to.
Regarding the first part of your message:
The elog server worked normally; entries (including the text body) got saved correctly until the last update?
The only thing in your list of updates, I can think of making this problem could be the update of ckeditor as it is the text editor used by elog.
The other packages should not be related to elog... but I am not a package maintainer.
I compiled elog from source and it brings the necessary files with it.
Best wishes,
Sebastian
Harry Martin wrote: |
I've been using elog for a few years now. I've had the current setup working for me up until today.
If I create a new message (entry, whatever they are called), or if I attempt to update an existing message, only the header information is saved. The body (the part I can see in the editor) does not get saved.
Yesterday, I did do some updates on the server machine. Among them was an update to apache2, but I am not using apache2 (I can disable apache2, and elogd continues serving elog on client machines). Also updated were several python3 packages; I ran into a compatibility problem with python3 with a different package, so I wonder if that could have some impact for elog also. About 50 packages were updated altogether.
Here are the packages that were updated yesterday (in case this is of interest to solving the issue):
[...]
This is a devuan ascii server only for clients on a local area network.
|
|
|
|
69421
|
Mon Nov 22 19:45:08 2021 |
| Harry Martin | harrymartin772@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.2 | Re: Body of new messages not getting saved when submitted | After downgrading ckeditor, my elog installation is working again. Thanks for your help.
Harry Martin wrote: |
(disregard my recent post here about missing package -- that wasn't the elog server!)
I can see that ckeditor was upgraded 11/19, which is would be prior to my recent attempts to use elog. It was apparently a security update, so I am not sure it is sensible to downgrade. OTOH, I am the only person here, and I have all sides carefully barracaded, so I don't think it would be much of an issue. But please disabuse me of my ignorance if need be.
Harry Martin wrote: |
Thank you for your quick response, Sebastion. The new version of ckeditor is 4.5.7 -- is this version compatible with elog 3.1.2? It is possible that I am using an outdated elog or outdated ckeditor due to the fact that this server is a bit old; I am looking to upgrade this machine soon, but I have several other issues to resolve first.
Sebastian Schenk wrote: |
Hello Harry,
the elog server (elogd) is a standalone application written in C and contains a full webserver and logfile management system.
There are no other dependencies to apache or python.
You can use a webserver like apache or nginx in combination with elog to act as a proxy,
e.g. to handle the encryption part of the communication between your web browser and the elogd, but you don't need to.
Regarding the first part of your message:
The elog server worked normally; entries (including the text body) got saved correctly until the last update?
The only thing in your list of updates, I can think of making this problem could be the update of ckeditor as it is the text editor used by elog.
The other packages should not be related to elog... but I am not a package maintainer.
I compiled elog from source and it brings the necessary files with it.
Best wishes,
Sebastian
Harry Martin wrote: |
I've been using elog for a few years now. I've had the current setup working for me up until today.
If I create a new message (entry, whatever they are called), or if I attempt to update an existing message, only the header information is saved. The body (the part I can see in the editor) does not get saved.
Yesterday, I did do some updates on the server machine. Among them was an update to apache2, but I am not using apache2 (I can disable apache2, and elogd continues serving elog on client machines). Also updated were several python3 packages; I ran into a compatibility problem with python3 with a different package, so I wonder if that could have some impact for elog also. About 50 packages were updated altogether.
Here are the packages that were updated yesterday (in case this is of interest to solving the issue):
[...]
This is a devuan ascii server only for clients on a local area network.
|
|
|
|
|
|