Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 529 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments  Show only new entries    6460 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 528, 529, 530 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subjectdown
  66375   Thu Jun 4 17:51:02 2009 Reply Mikemike@raghuexim.comBug reportLinux2.7.6-2204Re: Embedded images break when moving from one book to another.

Stefan Ritt wrote:

 

Mike wrote:

Here's the issue. We use elog to develope products we need to be able to see all the thumbnail images in a

particular logbook. Our default view is to use the threaded view fully expanded in order to have all the thumbnails

be displayed for each product. This works fine but when we move one message to another logbook the thumbnails

end up getting broken and won't be displayed. The only way to fix this is to remove the image and re-upload the

picture after the message is moved. This is not a good option because we have hundrends of items that are

constantly being moved around from logbook to logbook. Any ideas?

Regards,

Mike

 

EDIT:

On further inspection it seems that when you are moving messages to another log book the image date filename

is re-written which of course breaks the html link to the image.  Is there anyway to supress this so that the filename

stays in tact when it's moved from one book to another. I don't see why the name of an attachment has to get changed

just because something is moved around.

 

I fixed this in revision #2204. The attachment names now stay the same. There is one tiny risk of screwing up, namely if you have the same attachment name in two different logbooks (accidentally also submitted at the same second and therefore the same time stamp). If you then copy these two entries to a third logbook, one attachment will overwrite the other one, but that risk is indeed really small. I actually had to re-write the link to the attachment inside the text body (even differently for ELCode and HTML encoding). So I'm not 100% sure I covered all cases, so just give it a try.

 This is a major improvement. The only issue now is when we embed an image in the body of the message elog makes a nice thumbnail. When you move the message to another logbook the thumbnail doesn't work and instead it shows the MASSIVE full size version of the picture instead. Is that possible to fix?

 

Thanks Stefan!

Mike

  66381   Fri Jun 5 12:42:55 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportLinux2.7.6-2204Re: Embedded images break when moving from one book to another.
Mike wrote:

 This is a major improvement. The only issue now is when we embed an image in the body of the message elog makes a nice thumbnail. When you move the message to another logbook the thumbnail doesn't work and instead it shows the MASSIVE full size version of the picture instead. Is that possible to fix?

 

Thanks Stefan!

Mike

Can you try revision #2206? 

 

  66383   Fri Jun 5 14:13:52 2009 Reply Mikemike@raghuexim.comBug reportLinux2.7.6-2207Re: Embedded images break when moving from one book to another.

Stefan Ritt wrote:
Mike wrote:

 This is a major improvement. The only issue now is when we embed an image in the body of the message elog makes a nice thumbnail. When you move the message to another logbook the thumbnail doesn't work and instead it shows the MASSIVE full size version of the picture instead. Is that possible to fix?

 

Thanks Stefan!

Mike

Can you try revision #2206? 

 

 Stefan,

Works perfectly, thanks for the fix you rock!

Mike

  67956   Fri Jun 5 12:34:32 2015 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chCommentLinuxELOG V3.1.0-ac7Re: Emails generated by Elog

I acknowledge these two bugs and will fix them soon.

David Pilgram wrote:

I am one who received an email every time there is a new entry in this forum.

I have just noticed that since May 20, every email contains the message "An old ELOG entry has been updated: "

whereas before that date, the vast majority say "A new ELOG entry has been submitted: "

Is this something to do with the saving of draft messages?

Talking of which, I see my draft of this message shows up in the forum before I have submitted it.

 

  67969   Tue Jun 9 12:11:19 2015 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chCommentLinuxELOG V3.1.0-ac7Re: Emails generated by Elog

I fixed both issues in the current GIT version. Please double check it.

Stefan Ritt wrote:

I acknowledge these two bugs and will fix them soon.

David Pilgram wrote:

I am one who received an email every time there is a new entry in this forum.

I have just noticed that since May 20, every email contains the message "An old ELOG entry has been updated: "

whereas before that date, the vast majority say "A new ELOG entry has been submitted: "

Is this something to do with the saving of draft messages?

Talking of which, I see my draft of this message shows up in the forum before I have submitted it.

 

 

  66573   Tue Nov 3 09:14:14 2009 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chCommentLinux2.7.7-2254Re: Emails generated by *this* discussion forum
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> After 21.Oct, all the emails sent out by this discussion form now are addressed to
> 
> ELOG@ananke.jtan.com
> the name of the server my mails are sent to.
> 
> Before that the emails were addressed to 
> 
> ELOG@emix.psi.ch
> 
> Obviouisly my real email address is there, in the headers (as it would appear for a BCC)
> 
> The only consequence for me was these emails turned up in the wrong mailbox, but perhaps it has wider implications?

Indeed on Oct. 21st the SMPT server sending out emails from this forum has been changed. I checked my own mails coming 
from the forum, but I could not find any hint of what you describe above. The "From:" header contains "noreply@psi.ch" 
and the "To:" header is my email address. The "Received:" header contains our SMTP server, but you should not that field 
for filtering your email.

- Stefan
  1923   Tue Sep 5 15:59:47 2006 Reply David Spindlerdsspindler@earthlink.netQuestionWindows2.6.2-1699Re: Email substitution quit working

David Spindler wrote:
I have recently upgraded from the 2.6.0-beta (I believe) to 2.6.2-1699. I just found out that on the day I upgraded, email substitution has stopped working. I have checked the discussion area and all the documentation and do not see any clues. The debug_log.txt file shows that the emails are being processed, but the fields are not being substituted correctly.

Thanks, in advance for any help,
David

I have not been able to find anything wrong in my config file, so I replaced 2.6.2 with 2.6.1 (apparently that was what I was running last, not the 2.6.0-beta) and my troubles have disappeared.

Anybody have any idea what has happened?
  1951   Fri Sep 22 08:50:08 2006 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows2.6.2-1699Re: Email substitution quit working

David Spindler wrote:

David Spindler wrote:
I have recently upgraded from the 2.6.0-beta (I believe) to 2.6.2-1699. I just found out that on the day I upgraded, email substitution has stopped working. I have checked the discussion area and all the documentation and do not see any clues. The debug_log.txt file shows that the emails are being processed, but the fields are not being substituted correctly.

Thanks, in advance for any help,
David

I have not been able to find anything wrong in my config file, so I replaced 2.6.2 with 2.6.1 (apparently that was what I was running last, not the 2.6.0-beta) and my troubles have disappeared.

Anybody have any idea what has happened?


This problem has been fixed in revision 1712. So I made an 2.6.2-2 for the Windows community just now. Please upgrade.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 528, 529, 530 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6