Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 533 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments  Show only new entries    6459 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 532, 533, 534 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Versiondown Subject
  2203   Wed Apr 18 15:04:25 2007 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows2.6.4-1795Re: HOW TO change http://localhost:8080/ to an address where users can access?

marion wrote:
i am getting the idea that i am supposted to upload elog to my website ? is this correct?
ie e should make a directory for ELOG and load files - what files?
or all the files that came from the downloaded ELOG PROGRAM that i placed in my c-d rive ?
marion


Where is your website? If it's hosted at a company, it's probably impossible to run elog there, since they only allow PHP scripts etc.
  2204   Wed Apr 18 22:45:57 2007 Reply marionmarion@spiderweb.com.auQuestionWindows2.6.4-1795Re: HOW TO change http://localhost:8080/ to an address where users can access?

Stefan Ritt wrote:

marion wrote:
i am getting the idea that i am supposted to upload elog to my website ? is this correct?
ie e should make a directory for ELOG and load files - what files?
or all the files that came from the downloaded ELOG PROGRAM that i placed in my c-d rive ?
marion


Where is your website? If it's hosted at a company, it's probably impossible to run elog there, since they only allow PHP scripts etc.


where - i am not sure what you mean by where . it is hosted by franceso - i have full access to everything - i have cpanel -

Operating system Linux
Service Status Click to View
Kernel version 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
Machine Type i686
Apache version 1.3.37 (Unix)
PERL version 5.8.4
Path to PERL /usr/bin/perl
Path to sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail
Installed Perl Modules Click to View
PHP version 4.4.6
MySQL version 4.1.21-standard
cPanel Build 10.9.0-RELEASE 7965
Theme cPanel X v2.6.0
Documentation Click to View
  2207   Thu Apr 19 07:40:01 2007 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows2.6.4-1795Re: HOW TO change http://localhost:8080/ to an address where users can access?

marion wrote:
it is hosted by franceso - i have full access to everything - i have cpanel -


Then you have to install elog there from the RPM. See http://midas.psi.ch/elog/adminguide.html
  2153   Fri Mar 2 16:39:22 2007 Question Justin Ellisonjustin@techadvise.comQuestion 2.6.4-179Hiding attributes in Detail view?
First off, thanks so much for this product. It works excellent for us as a server activity log. I have a question, which depending on the answer, might be a feature request Wink

As I mentioned, we use elog as a serverlog. Sometimes, but not always, we will have a Bugzilla bug # that is associated with the log entry. We then take that bug #, and build a link to our bugzilla server displaying the bug. Here's the relevant config entries:
Attributes = Author, Classification, Subject, Bug Number, Environment, Server, Bugzilla
...
#Make the list table narrow enough to fit in the browser
List display = ID, Date, Author, Subject, Server, Bugzilla
...
#We take in a Bug Number from the user, then calculate a Bugzilla link from that
Change Bugzilla = <a href="http://bugz:4545/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=$Bug Number">$Bug Number</a>
List Change Bugzilla = <a href="http://bugz:4545/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=$Bug Number">$Bug Number</a>
Hidden Attributes = Bugzilla

So, on new entry, the user has the option to enter a Bug Number. Bugzilla is not displayed because it is derived. In list view, Bug Number is not displayed, but Bugzilla is, providing a handy link to the bug on a different server.

The only thing that isn't working as I'd like is when someone views a log entry. Both Bug Number and Bugzilla show up in the attributes. This isn't a huge deal, it's just showing redundant data.

Is there a way to hide Bug Number on the view page?
  2160   Fri Mar 9 22:14:57 2007 Reply Justin Ellisonjustin@techadvise.comQuestion 2.6.4-179Re: Hiding attributes in Detail view?
Any takers?
  2161   Mon Mar 12 20:35:17 2007 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestion 2.6.4-179Re: Hiding attributes in Detail view?

Justin Ellison wrote:
The only thing that isn't working as I'd like is when someone views a log entry. Both Bug Number and Bugzilla show up in the attributes. This isn't a huge deal, it's just showing redundant data.

Is there a way to hide Bug Number on the view page?


In revision 1809 I implemented the options
Show attributes = ...
Show attributed edit = ...

The first one is for the log entry page, the second for the entry form. This way you can distinguish between the bug number and the link. The old option Hidden attributes has been dropped, since it has the same effect now as Show attributes edit.
  2143   Tue Feb 20 18:41:31 2007 Entry Martin Killenbergmartin.killenberg@web.deCommentLinux2.6.4Hardcoded Path in Makefile
I tried to compile ELOG on Scientific Linux Cern 4.4 and found that make quits because uname is not located in /usr/bin (like it is hardcoded in the makefile) but in /bin.
Later I found that this is only the case in the svn version, in the "latest.tar.gz" from 2007/02/20 the path is /bin.
Why do you have the absolute path in the Makefile? uname should be in the default path on any system. (The same applies to "rm")

I also was confused that you only provide one rpm Package (except for debian) without mentioning for which distribution. You try to avoid dependencies, but the elogd is linked against the basic libraries libc and ld-linux, which might vary.
  2144   Tue Feb 20 21:10:28 2007 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chCommentLinux2.6.4Re: Hardcoded Path in Makefile

Martin Killenberg wrote:
I tried to compile ELOG on Scientific Linux Cern 4.4 and found that make quits because uname is not located in /usr/bin (like it is hardcoded in the makefile) but in /bin.
Later I found that this is only the case in the svn version, in the "latest.tar.gz" from 2007/02/20 the path is /bin.
Why do you have the absolute path in the Makefile? uname should be in the default path on any system. (The same applies to "rm")

I also was confused that you only provide one rpm Package (except for debian) without mentioning for which distribution. You try to avoid dependencies, but the elogd is linked against the basic libraries libc and ld-linux, which might vary.


Ups. The hard-coded /usr/uname somehow sneaked in from some temporary test. I removed it in the current SVN.

Indeed the RPM package I provide is built under Scientific Linux. The Debian port is done by someone else. Unfortunately I don't have ten boxes with all possible distributions laying around, so my possibilities are quite limited and I depend on third party help. If you want to contribute additional RPMs you are welcome.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 532, 533, 534 ... 806, 807, 808   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6