| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
2010
|
Thu Oct 19 12:42:42 2006 |
 | deletoille | xavier.deletoille@synchrotron-soleil.fr | Bug report | Linux | Windows | 2.6.2-1723 | Re: Date format in Threaded display |
IT WORKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THANKS A LOT |
|
2023
|
Fri Oct 27 19:11:32 2006 |
 | Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Bug report | All | 2.6.2-1723 | Interesting behavior with $shell |
eLog does not do math so I am trying to leverage the $SHELL function to perform the math. I am using GAWK to perform the math -- I started trying to use CONDITIONAL ATTRIBUTES to assign numeric values to attributes but with loading up the ATTRIBUTES with all of the options brings elog to its knees in terms of performance -- the parsing of attributes is simply too string intensive.
So, I embedded the numeric score in the OPTIONS of the ATTRIBUTE and leveraged the text processing prowess of GAWK:
Options WhoIsEffected = 1:...Single User, 5:...Project, 10:...Department, 50:...Site
Options ServiceOutage = 1:...0-1 Minutes, 2:...10 Minutes, 10:...20 Minutes, 30:...30 Minutes, 100:...gt60
Then pass the following command to GAWK:
Preset TotalScore = $shell(gawk 'BEGIN{split(\"$WhoIsEffected:$ServiceOutage\",scores,\":\");print scores[1]+scores[3]}' )
The interesting result is this works - the proper summation is returned but apparently elog parsing also returns everything after the first ')' as something that also needs to be returned. So the resulting contents of TotalScore is 2;print scores[1]+scores[3]}' ) assuming one chose the first option of both attributes (the output pasted here are real results).
Before getting to this point I tried using the GAWK internal variable of $0 - but this did not work because apparently $0 in elog is defined as the OS shell!
Stefan, is it possible for you to try creating a logbook on the elog demo site that shows people how to perform math and in the process discover what the $SHELL function is doing? |
|
2024
|
Sun Oct 29 16:04:05 2006 |
 | Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Bug report | All | 2.6.2-1723 | Re: Interesting behavior with $shell |
| Steve Jones wrote: | eLog does not do math so I am trying to leverage the $SHELL function to perform the math. I am using GAWK to perform the math -- I started trying to use CONDITIONAL ATTRIBUTES to assign numeric values to attributes but with loading up the ATTRIBUTES with all of the options brings elog to its knees in terms of performance -- the parsing of attributes is simply too string intensive.
So, I embedded the numeric score in the OPTIONS of the ATTRIBUTE and leveraged the text processing prowess of GAWK:
Options WhoIsEffected = 1:...Single User, 5:...Project, 10:...Department, 50:...Site
Options ServiceOutage = 1:...0-1 Minutes, 2:...10 Minutes, 10:...20 Minutes, 30:...30 Minutes, 100:...gt60
Then pass the following command to GAWK:
Preset TotalScore = $shell(gawk 'BEGIN{split(\"$WhoIsEffected:$ServiceOutage\",scores,\":\");print scores[1]+scores[3]}' )
The interesting result is this works - the proper summation is returned but apparently elog parsing also returns everything after the first ')' as something that also needs to be returned. So the resulting contents of TotalScore is 2;print scores[1]+scores[3]}' ) assuming one chose the first option of both attributes (the output pasted here are real results).
Before getting to this point I tried using the GAWK internal variable of $0 - but this did not work because apparently $0 in elog is defined as the OS shell!
Stefan, is it possible for you to try creating a logbook on the elog demo site that shows people how to perform math and in the process discover what the $SHELL function is doing? |
| Steve Jones wrote: |
So, in order to quickly get around the problem I did the following:
Preset TotalScore = $shell(echo \"$WhoIsEffected:$ServiceOutage\" | gawk -f <gawkscript>' )
This works since all of the script logic is contained in an external script but removes the logic from the elog config, so if anything changes one has to remember to change the script (which is in a comment).
|
|
|
1979
|
Wed Oct 11 11:37:03 2006 |
 | Gregory M. Caughey | caugheygm@aol.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box |
Hi Stefan!
Been running Elog-2.6.2-1714 successfully for a while and yesterday decided to download and experiment with the latest Elog-2.6.2-1722 build. I want to report a possible bug involving the "Suppress default" option when running build 2.6.2-1722 on a Windows XP laptop. I installed 2.6.2-1722 into a development folder and copied my current production 'elogd.cfg' file and other custom files to the development folder. Test postings produced the following results:
1.) The "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option causes the [] Suppress Email notification to display or not display as expected.
2.) However, email notifications will be sent under all circumstances regardless of which parameter selected.
3.) Downgrading to Elog-2.6.2-1714 produces the expected behavior.
I am running Windows XP with all current upgrades and security patches and Internet Explorer 7 - version: 7.0.5700.6
Regards, Greg |
|
1980
|
Wed Oct 11 11:47:29 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box |
| Gregory M. Caughey wrote: | | 2.) However, email notifications will be sent under all circumstances regardless of which parameter selected. |
Thanks for reporting that problem. I just implemented Suppress email on edit and this could have had some side effect. I tried however to reproduce your problem and was not able to. Trying the "minimal" configuration file, the email notifications were suppressed if the check box was checked, or if Suppress default = 3. Can you check if it works with a minimal config file, and if yes, what option in your "full" config file causes this effect? |
|
1983
|
Wed Oct 11 19:37:10 2006 |
 | Gregory M. Caughey | caugheygm@aol.com | Bug report | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Gregory M. Caughey wrote: | | 2.) However, email notifications will be sent under all circumstances regardless of which parameter selected. |
Thanks for reporting that problem. I just implemented Suppress email on edit and this could have had some side effect. I tried however to reproduce your problem and was not able to. Trying the "minimal" configuration file, the email notifications were suppressed if the check box was checked, or if Suppress default = 3. Can you check if it works with a minimal config file, and if yes, what option in your "full" config file causes this effect? |
OK, you're absolutely correct. When I run Elog-2.6.2-1722 with a minimal 'elogd.cfg' the "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" flag does appear to behave as expected. Taking your advice I went through my local 'elogd.cfg' evaluating items to see where the problem starts and I found a problem. In my local config file I use conditional attributes to modify the "category" and "type" fields (in the posting form) and here is what I'm finding wrong. For this example I have set "Suppress default = 3" and the following actions take place:
1.) Select "New" to begin a post and the form displays correctly with NO "[] Suppress Email notification" checkbox showing.
2.) When selecting "Category" an choosing an appropriate menu item the form is then redrawn and now there is a problem, the "[] Suppress Email notification" checkbox is displaying. The checkbox does work correctly but the behavior I'm expecting is for no checkbox to display during the composition of this posting. Am I misunderstanding the behavior of the "Suppress default = 3" flag?
3.) Each of the other flag parameters appear to work as expected as used in the above example.
I have attached screenshots that demonstrate this behavior as well as a snippet of the 'elogd.cfg' file.
Hope this helps a little...
Thanks, Greg |
| Attachment 1: Capture10-11-2006-5.05.21_AM.jpg
|
|
| Attachment 2: Capture10-11-2006-5.06.40_AM.jpg
|
|
| Attachment 3: Capture10-11-2006-5.09.34_AM.jpg
|
|
|
1984
|
Thu Oct 12 16:22:40 2006 |
 | Ibrahim Genc | ig004@hotmail.com | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Error Sending Email |
I've set up all e-mail configuration but I get error message after submitting a message
verbose output is as follows: every parameter I used works in outlook express.
Another question is; Can I change the port number of the smtp server? Some servers use another port than 25.
Thanks so much.
--
ibrahim
------------------------------------------------
Email ALL to genc@xxx.com.tr
timezone: -7200, offset: 10800
Email from genc@xxx.com.tr to genc@xxx.com.tr,genc@xxx.com.tr,, SMTP host
mail.xxx.com.tr:
220 mx-d.xxx.com ESMTP Postfix
EHLO neuron
250-mail-003.xxx.com
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 41943040
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5
250-AUTH=LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5
250 8BITMIME
==== Return ================================
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Server: ELOG HTTP 2.6.2-1722
Connection: Keep-Alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=60, max=10
Location: http://127.0.0.1:8080/PhD/4?error=Error+sending+Email+via+<i>"mail.xxx.com.tr"</i> |
|
1985
|
Thu Oct 12 16:34:07 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.6.2-1722 | Re: Error Sending Email |
| Ibrahim Genc wrote: | | I get error message after submitting a message |
Your verbose output seems to be only partial. I have modified the verbose output recently, so please update to a more recent version of elog. With 2.6.2-3 I get for example
Email from stefan.ritt@psi.ch to stefan.ritt@psi.ch, SMTP host xxx.psi.ch:
220 xxx.psi.ch xxxvs01 Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:25:17 +0200
HELO xxx.psi.ch
250 xxx.psi.ch Hello [129.129.xxx.xxx]
MAIL FROM: stefan.ritt@psi.ch
250 2.1.0 stefan.ritt@psi.ch....Sender OK
RCPT TO: <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
250 2.1.5 stefan.ritt@psi.ch
RCPT TO: <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
250 2.1.5 stefan.ritt@psi.ch
DATA
354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:25:17 +0200
To: "Stefan Ritt" <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
From: Stefan Ritt <stefan.ritt@psi.ch>
User-Agent: Elog Version 2.6.2
Subject: Updated ELOG entry
X-Elog-URL: http://localhost:8080/demo/1
X-Elog-submit-type: web|elog
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
... here comes the complete email body ....
.
250 2.6.0 <xxx.psi.ch> Queued mail for delivery
QUIT
221 2.0.0 xxx.psi.ch Service closing transmission channel
==== Return ================================
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Server: ELOG HTTP 2.6.2-1724
Connection: Keep-Alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=60, max=10
Content-Length: 20
This is of course without SMTP username. Our mail server does not support SMTP username, so I programmed this kind of "blindly".
| Ibrahim Genc wrote: | | Another question is; Can I change the port number of the smtp server? Some servers use another port than 25. |
All server I met so far were running on port 25, so I hardcoded this in elogd.c. You can change it in the source code at line 2119:
bind_addr.sin_port = htons((short) 25);
If more people ask for this, I can make it a parameter. |