Demo Discussion

Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities

Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 550 of 808  Not logged in

Find |  Login |  Help

Full | Summary | Threaded | Show attachments     -- All entries -- Last day Last 3 Days Last week Last month Last 3 Months Last 6 Months Last Year -- Category -- Info Bug report Bug fix Question Request Comment Other  6460 Entries

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 549, 550, 551 ... 806, 807, 808   Next

ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject   2121   Thu Jan 18 20:19:22 2007   Stefan Ritt stefan.ritt@psi.ch Question Linux | Mac OSX 2.6.3-1762 Re: Synchronization using https Alexandre Lindote wrote: Now we want to have several servers set up (in different institutions), and have them synchronized automatically. Synchronization works such that the "client" elogd (the one on which the synchronization is started) "emulates" a browser and accesses the other elogd server. Since SSL is not built into elogd, it can only use the http protocol, not https. If you want secure synchronization, the only chance you have is to make a SSH tunnel on which you run the http protocol for synchronization.   2120   Thu Jan 18 16:29:43 2007   Alexandre Lindote alex@lipc.fis.uc.pt Question Linux | Mac OSX 2.6.3-1762 Synchronization using https Hi, I have an elog server running on a linux desktop machine inside our institutional firewall. It can be accessed from inside the firewall directly using http, but users from outside have to use https, with apache (and its ssl module) controlling the access. I also set up another server on my laptop, just for backup purposes, and synchronized it inside the firewall (using a direct http connection). No problems there! Now we want to have several servers set up (in different institutions), and have them synchronized automatically. For this I installed elog on a mac server (in another institution, so outside our firewall), also accessible only through https (again using apache). I configured all the required mirror settings, but always get an error: "Remote server is not an ELOG server". I've tried changing the status of the 2 machines (server-client), but get the same error... I also tried different approaches for the Mirror server parameter, like https://the.remote.server https://the.remote.server:443 http://the.remote.server:443 but no luck... Running elog with the -D flag off issued this message: Quote: HTTP/1.1 401 Authorization Required Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:22:10 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Darwin) DAV/1.0.3 mod_ssl/2.8.24 OpenSSL/0.9.7l WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="zeplin2" Connection: close Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Authorization Required This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn't understand how to supply the credentials required. Apache/1.3.33 Server at shalott.pp.rl.ac.uk Port 80 The servers have user level passwords, and I'm mirroring with Mirror user parameter set to the administrator... Any ideas? Thanks in advance Alex   2119   Wed Jan 17 13:33:27 2007   Stefan Ritt stefan.ritt@psi.ch Question Linux | Windows 2.6.3-1762 Re: Two different attributes with the same list deletoille wrote: Do I have to program the list for "Equipement Impacté" or is there a simple command to say that "Equipement incrimé" and "equipement inpacté" have the same list? Ok, now I understand. No, there is no simple way, you have to specify both lists explicitly. But it's just a copy and paste in your editor By the way, have you discovered Google Translate? Like http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmidas.psi.ch%2Felogs%2FForum%2F2115&langpair=en%7Cfr Not perfect, but readable. I know a Korean and a Japanese guy who do not speak English but talk to each other via email with this automatic translation tool Korean->English->Japanese and back. Amazing.   2118   Wed Jan 17 13:27:46 2007   deletoille xavier.deletoille@synchrotron-soleil.fr Question Linux | Windows 2.6.3-1762 Re: Two different attributes with the same list Stefan Ritt wrote: deletoille wrote: In this picture of my project, All the attributes included in the red circle are the same except the names of the attribute “Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté”. “Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté” have the same list. The displayed list for the both attributes is the multiple conditions result coming from the choice of “groupe incriminé or impacté, sous ensemble, selection, and localisation”. So if I have to program the list twice, it will be twice bigger. Do I need to program the same list twice for the two attributes or is there a simple command to say that the two precedent attributes are equal? I don't understand your problem. The picture you attached, was this some ELOG output (it looks very different than the usual one...)? Do mean you have two attributes with the same "Options <attribute> = ...,..,.." list? With "multiple conditions" you mean that you do a search in ELOG with a condition one one attribute, but in the filter list both attributes having the same option list are shown. Is this correct? What section of the configuration file are you talking about? Best regards Stefan I'm soory, i'm very poor in english. Here is a very small part of my program: {AE&Anneau&Panne} Moptions Défaut = Flowmeter or Door meter, Communication, Earth, IAC, Driver, Temp. Ambiant, Phase, Cooling Water, Overvoltage, OverCurrent, Sample Card, Ripple, EEPROM, Autres {AE&Anneau&Gr} Moptions Equipement incriminé = Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q10, QT, S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, Alim correcteurs H., Alim correcteurs V., alim. Dipole, Alim Q., Alim S. {AE&Anneau&Se&C01} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR. {AE&Anneau&Se&C02} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.2-CH, S8.2-QT, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.1-QT, S10.2-CH, COR. {AE&Anneau&Se&C03} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.1-QT, S8.2-CH, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.2-CH, S10.2-QT, COR. {AE&Anneau&Se&C04} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR. {AE&Anneau&Se&C05} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR. {AE&Anneau&Se&C06} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.2-CH, S8.2-QT, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.1-QT, S10.2-CH, COR. {AE&Anneau&Se&C07} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.1-QT ,S8.2-CH, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.2-CH, S10.2-QT, COR. {AE&Anneau&Se&C08} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR. {AE&Anneau&Se&C09} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR. {AE&Anneau&Se&C10} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.2-CH ,S8.2-QT, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.1-QT, S10.2-CH, COR. {AE&Anneau&Se&C11} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.1-QT, S8.2-CH, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.2-CH, S10.2-QT, COR. {AE&Anneau&Se&C12} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR. {AE&Anneau&Se&C13} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR. {AE&Anneau&Se&C14} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.2-CH, S8.2-QT, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.1-QT, S10.2-CH, COR. {AE&Anneau&Se&C15} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.1-QT, S8.2-CH, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.2-CH, S10.2-QT, COR. {AE&Anneau&Se&C16} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR. Do I have to program the list for "Equipement Impacté" or is there a simple command to say that "Equipement incrimé" and "equipement inpacté" have the same list? Thanks in advance Xavier Deletoille   2117   Wed Jan 17 12:55:07 2007   Stefan Ritt stefan.ritt@psi.ch Question     Re: How many topgroups can be defined? Exaos Lee wrote: I defined 6 top groups in my cfg file as the attachment. But ... It doesn't work as I wanted. The 4th and 5th groups need login. But when I clicked the 4th or 5th group, the login isn't needed. And the 4th and 5th password files are not generated automatically. When changing groups and to groups, one can sometimes get fooled by old cookies. Delete all your cookies and try again. You can also install the "Tamper Data" extension for Firefox (https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/966/) which shows you which cookies are sent to your ELOG server. This should reveal the problem.   2116   Wed Jan 17 12:49:25 2007   Stefan Ritt stefan.ritt@psi.ch Question Linux | Windows 2.6.3-1762 Re: Two different attributes with the same list deletoille wrote: In this picture of my project, All the attributes included in the red circle are the same except the names of the attribute “Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté”. “Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté” have the same list. The displayed list for the both attributes is the multiple conditions result coming from the choice of “groupe incriminé or impacté, sous ensemble, selection, and localisation”. So if I have to program the list twice, it will be twice bigger. Do I need to program the same list twice for the two attributes or is there a simple command to say that the two precedent attributes are equal? I don't understand your problem. The picture you attached, was this some ELOG output (it looks very different than the usual one...)? Do mean you have two attributes with the same "Options <attribute> = ...,..,.." list? With "multiple conditions" you mean that you do a search in ELOG with a condition one one attribute, but in the filter list both attributes having the same option list are shown. Is this correct? What section of the configuration file are you talking about? Best regards Stefan   2115   Wed Jan 17 09:20:17 2007   deletoille xavier.deletoille@synchrotron-soleil.fr Question Linux | Windows 2.6.3-1762 Two different attributes with the same list In this picture of my project, All the attributes included in the red circle are the same except the names of the attribute “Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté”. “Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté” have the same list. The displayed list for the both attributes is the multiple conditions result coming from the choice of “groupe incriminé or impacté, sous ensemble, selection, and localisation”. So if I have to program the list twice, it will be twice bigger. Do I need to program the same list twice for the two attributes or is there a simple command to say that the two precedent attributes are equal? Thanks in advance Xavier Deletoille   2114   Tue Jan 16 23:01:30 2007   Stefan Ritt stefan.ritt@psi.ch Bug report Windows 2.6.3-1776 Re: ELOG Crash by many email address An Thai wrote: Hello, when I try to set above 112 email addresses in "Email All = ..." the Elog service will crash with the error ntdll.dll or memory addresses x0000000. This problem does not happen when I reduce the number of email addresses. Have you had the same problem? I fixed that crash in the current version, but there is actually a limit of 100 email addresses. So anyhow you won't get the 12 ones above 100. I will try to increase that limit in the next version of elog.

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 549, 550, 551 ... 806, 807, 808   Next

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6